Will Tea Party Republicans Blame Dems for No Social Security COLA?

October 15, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (18)

Today's news that seniors will not get a cost-of-living raise in their Social Security payments in 2011 will pose an interesting challenge for the Tea Party Republicans.

It is a test of sincerity vs. greed that I suspect the Right will fail.

The TPR types are outraged about government spending and debt, right? Several of their anointed candidates have called for the abolishment of expensive big government programs, like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and unemployment insurance. And so they should be celebrating the fact that, for the second year in a row, inflation has been mastered, and a multi-million-dollar COLA payment avoided.

Yet somehow I suspect that this weekend we'll start seeing the E-mail chain letters, whipping up the codgers and blaming the Democrats in Congress for short-changing seniors. That is what happened last year.

[See who donates the most to your member of Congress.]

For the fact-based among you, here is what has occurred. Soaring energy prices in 2008 produced a whopping 5.8 percent COLA hike in 2009—the largest in 27 years. Then energy prices and other costs plummeted in the recession. Inflation was kept in check by the tough economic times. The government didn't ask Social Security recipients to pay the money back, or to take a cut last year. It simply didn't add another COLA.

Some conservative analysts have been honest about this. "Seniors aren't being treated unfairly here," Andrew Biggs, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, told the New York Times. In 2009 "they received a nearly 6 percent COLA for inflation that no longer really existed."

Those bleeding-heart Democrats in Congress, concerned about the many folks for whom Social Security is the only or main retirement income (and worried about the political effects of the no-COLA announcement) have declared that they hope to return in November and approve a $250 payment to Social Security recipients. I would be all for it, if it is means tested and not paid to rich folks who don't need it.

But somehow I suspect that this won't be enough and that the Democrats will be blamed in the next three weeks for screwing seniors out of their COLA.

What say you, TPR retirees? Will you be true to your principles? Or to greed?

Tags:
Democratic Party,
2010 Congressional elections,
social security,
Tea Party,
energy policy and climate change,
Congress,
deficit and national debt,
unemployment,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Seniors have been hit with a double wammy this year. No COLA increase for 2010 and they just knocked down a proposal by the Democrats to give the $250.00 one time payment, also they cut social security payroll taxes 2% for one year, which will more than likely stay in force because of the 2012 election coming up. Seniors need to rally on Washington and keep the phone lines hot to your Senators in the coming years. They are out to destroy social security and medicare.

Steven of KY 6:21AM December 20, 2010

What people should be concerned about is President Obama proposing $250 per SS recipient to "make up for" no COLA for SS. It didn't make any sense last time, and it makes less now. Prices are up for all, especially those who are older, but you can't unring the bell. Just don't keep yanking on the bell cord.

Jill of CA 5:50PM October 20, 2010

Election Year Medicaid Medicare Inducement issues left open for November not openly discussed.Politics have gone from heated to man on fire thoughts. Also the Judicial dilemmas, since all are offically allowed to bear arms again, the big city Mayors are concerned about how the poor will be able to rearm themselves, and are looking for some type of financial relief from Federal State Medicaid programs to maintain their status quo.The higher courts face tough issues this term since making honest fraud legal, there agenda now turns toward making honest kickbacks and honest bribes equally as legal. This topic remains high as a shared issue by the medicaid medicare enrollment providers since they are looking to expand inducements past the complicated pregnancy stage.The DOJ has serious concerns that if legalized marijuana in California for medical reasons could be used as a inducement or inticement to help secure new enrollments for the Federal State Medicare Medicaid programs.The State of California is concerned that if the Feds step up their effort in killing off the marijuana crops it could cause higher tax problems that effect Medicaid currently under consideration by the State 'marijuana tax control board'. Limo drivers cancel their planned Medicaid Cuts DC rally and leave for California to protect this years crop. Wow, don't think I would like to be in Politics for this years elections. Govenor Schwarzenegger indicated that if the Tea Partys membership keeps holding their rallies at our Marijuana burning fields they will have to be taxed for their free use of inhalants, prior to having them bused back to Arizona.

rudy of CA 5:46AM October 20, 2010

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Latest Videos

advertisement