Virginia Gov. McDonnell’s Voodoo Liquor-to-Roads Plan

September 10, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (7)

Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell was one of the first American politicians to ride the current wave of discontent into office. Like some of those jokers we’ll be judging on the ballot in November, he promised that there were easy solutions to difficult problems.

[Read more about the 2010 elections.]

McDonnell’s signature proposal was to raise half a billion dollars for direly needed transportation projects in Virginia without raising taxes. He would do so, he said, by selling off the state’s hard liquor business.

Well, this week he unveiled his plan. Guess what. It calls for raising taxes. On small businesses. In hard times.

[Read more about unemployment and the economy.]

The problem with selling the state liquor business is that it reliably brings Virginia about $324 million in revenue each year. Sure, McDonnell can reap a one-time windfall by auctioning off the pieces for $458 million, but how is he going to make up for the missing millions once he spends his windfall? Sell the University of Virginia? Rent out Mount Vernon for weddings?

McDonnell can recoup some money by collecting license fees from the 600 Walmarts and Safeways and the like and 400 smaller shops that will now become corner liquor stores. (Not that there’s anything wrong with that.) But his plan necessarily calls for an increase in the liquor tax on wholesalers and qualifying restaurants and bars.

Excuse me, fees. “It’s not a tax increase, and people who say that are simply misrepresenting the facts,” the somewhat touchy governor said.

Even with the tax … er, fees, “the risks posed by Mr. McDonnell’s plan to the state’s finances, which could be considerable, may outweigh the prospective benefits for its transportation system, which look modest,” said the Washington Post, which studies such things. The $458 million “doesn’t even begin to cover the cost of maintaining Virginia’s roads for six months, let alone constructing new ones.”

I don’t much care if the state wants to tax me at the gas pump, or when I go out to dinner. What I want is a Metro system that won’t kill me, and good roads to drive on. And leaders who won’t tell me there’s some voodoo trick to turn bourbon into asphalt.

 

Tags:
alcohol,
recession,
2010 Congressional elections,
economy,
Robert McDonnell,
Congress,
taxes,
transportation,
Virginia,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Federal, state & local infrastructures (roads, sewers, etc) are in dire need of repairs due to consistent short sightedness of the voting public.

Virginia's governor is just following a long tradition of playing a shell game in which the taxpayer gets taken (again). Selling off the Virginia ABC stores just continues this "What's in it for me?" attitude of politicians and the voting public and hides the true problem ...

The federal, state & often the local governments are being expected to provide goods and services at less than cost! We have to cut demand & expectations if we are to cut short or long-term costs significantly.

Politicians of both parties have avoided addressing standard supply & demand issues and instead they have both cut supply (revenue/taxes) and added demand (expectations of services/entitlements/social programs) because these actions make good 'sound bites' in election propaganda.

Voters need to wake-up and demand honest, true solutions to the real supply/demand problem.

Note: The push (demand?) to reduce government employee benefits (ie: retirement plans) often fails to take into account that most government employees take home pay is and has been 5-10% lower than that of private industry for years and years ... without decent pay and/or benefits how can the public expect a ‘smart’, efficient government and decent service?

Chuck of VA 1:25PM September 16, 2010

You are basing your comment on a unidentified tea member ?

WOW…

What don’t I use a unidentified liberal that said the same thing. You going to believe that ?

Maybe you made it up.

Breaking contracts is not what the Tea Party is all about. Let’s talk facts. Obama broke contracts with secured lenders with GM. That was wrong.

Bill Hedges of MO 6:24PM September 12, 2010

With unemployment rising some in the Tea Party are calling foul. "Why can't the public workers also be unemployed? I mean, they negotiated contracts with pensions and health care and now they have good jobs, that makes me mad!" - unidentified Tea Party member.

The Tea party seeks to ignore that the states and various public worker unions both agreed to a contract and that the public workers have held up their end of the bargain. Now the Tea Party seeks to break the contract in a shameful show of lies and deceit.

Don't worry though. Tea Party members will get a taste of their own medicine when the government breaks the mortgage rules and requires folks to pay 10% or 20% interest on their home loans that previously were promised to be fixed rates. Also social security and medicare benefits will be cut 50% for those currently receiving benefits. After all, once you start breaking contracts, where does it stop? And once you support that method of balancing the books, you can't complain when your benefits are affected.

Good post of LA 5:28PM September 12, 2010

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Latest Videos

advertisement