McChrystal Firing Is a Sign of Afghanistan Problems

June 24, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (9)

There is no good news for Americans, this summer, in the departure of Gen. Stanley McChrystal.

Forget Harry Truman. American presidents don't fire generals who are winning America's wars.

I just finished reading the Rolling Stone piece that caused this great furor. I urge you to do the same. There is nothing in it, but a few mild and childish wisecracks from the general's aides, to justify the charge of insubordination. If Barack Obama fired McChrystal in the midst of a winning campaign in Afghanistan because the members of McChrystal's staff have a sophomoric sense of humor, we are in trouble indeed, my friends.

[Read 10 Things You Didn't Know About Stanley McChrystal.]

What really cooked McChrystal is the fact that, after a very public lobbying campaign for this year's "surge" in Afghanistan, McChrystal now confesses that his strategy isn't working. It seemed, in the Rolling Stone profile, that he has begun to hesitate, to look for other folks to blame, and to be laying the groundwork for another PR offensive for more troops, next summer. Even then, says Team McChrystal, the United States won't find victory, just stalemate. This is a war, they predict, that is going to end in divisive argument, not victory parades.

[Check out a roundup of editorial cartoons about Afghanistan.]

And then there is the fact, as outlined in Rolling Stone and The New York Times, that McChrystal is losing the confidence of the grunts doing the fighting and dying over there, who are exposing themselves to greater danger for a counterinsurgency strategy that's not producing its promised results.

Soldiers do gripe. Aides do gossip. The greatest military leaders are sometimes independent, and cocky, to a fault. But winning takes care of everything. And, right now, again, we don't even seem to know what victory looks like.

Tags:
Stanley McChrystal,
War in Afghanistan (2001-),
Afghanistan,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

McCrystal knows we aren't winning in Afghanistan and probably flipped out rather than endure the failure he was leading. Its a mess and McCrystal as good as he is doesn't have the right stuff. I'm not sure anyone can fix the mess over there that's been thousand of years in the making.

Frank of MO 1:35AM June 26, 2010

He and his aides may be able,but their judgementr is seriously impaired and extremely disrepectful as are the biggest share of the Republican Party. The General and his part were apparently very deeply in their CUPS.

wALLY of WI 2:57PM June 25, 2010

Obama's the one that promoted the surge in Afghanistan last year; he's quite aware of the war because after all he kept us in Afghanistan and beefed up our efforts there. The real question is does Gen. McCrystal know who he's working for and who he answers to?

steve of IL 12:49PM June 25, 2010

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Latest Videos

advertisement