The Stupidest Tea Party Idea: Repeal the 17th Amendment

June 1, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (26)

By John Aloysius Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Of all the goofy ideas from those lovable, wacky Tea Partyers, the suggestion that we repeal the 17th amendment, and take the direct election of U.S. senators away from the people, is the stupidest.

Having spent much of the last five years immersed in the newspapers, speeches and history of the Populist and Progressive Eras, I can tell you why Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson and millions of Americans took the election of the Senate from the state legislatures, and gave it to the people: The legislatures were corrupt!

[Find out who contributes to your U.S. senator]

As bad as Congress is now, when it comes to knuckling under to special interests, the legislatures at the end of the 19th century were worse. They were owned by the railroads, or the whiskey trust, or the streetcar and gas magnates, or the oil or steel industries. They were hick farmers and working stiffs, sent by state or city machines, to Springfield or Trenton where, it was universally understood, they would supplement their meager salaries by having corporations grease their palms.

You think these boyos were immune to partisanship? In those days, party discipline was imposed and enforced by both Republican and Democratic bosses with the kind of ruthless efficiency that Nancy Pelosi and Newt Gingrich could only dream of. [See who supports Pelosi.]

Look around folks. Does anyone in Albany look like a budding Jefferson or Madison? How about Sacramento? The guys and gals there have done a terrific job with the state budget, no? Have any of you Tea Partyers actually visited Annapolis or Austin?

There is a reason our great-grandfathers undertook the difficult and arduous task of amending the Constitution to have senators elected by the people. They had a saying back then, that has stuck around--for good reason--for more than a hundred years since a judge coined it in a New York court case: "No man's life, liberty, or property are safe when the legislature is in session."

Tags:
Tea Party,
Congress,
Constitution,
Nancy Pelosi,
Newt Gingrich,
Senate

Reader Comments Read all comments (26)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Amen to Mike of Illinois. Just because there was some corruption the OLD way doesn't make the NEW way the answer. Repeal the 17th, then fix what's wrong. I would trade the problems that arise from having a true Constitutional Republic for the problems that arise from having a transient democracy any day .... carry on.

Ken LaVoie of ME 5:27PM October 29, 2012

Before the 17th Amendment, states were able to protect themselves from the federal government if the Congress began legislating against the states rights. US Senators could veto any legislation by the House of Representatives which was considered a threat to the rights of the individual states. The 17th Amendment wiped out the states' rights.

Because of the 17th Amendment, the states as sovereign commonwealths have lost their representation on the federal level and Senators are subject to the same popular pressures during an election campaign as the members of the House of Representatives.

Now, federal funds appropriated for a state are generally a source of popular acclaim and Senators, like Congressmen, usually hasten to get them approved. Too often it has been of little consequence that those funds might be expended in violation of basic powers reserved to the state.

Mike of IL 12:23PM February 21, 2011

The mere fact that the left wing Progressive Socialists oppose this movement to repeal the 17th Amendment is proof enough that it should be done.

It would break the grip that the left has on the entitlement dependent voters in the population centers of America, and more clearly represent the majority of Americans who are still left of center. Need proof of this; just look at the Red/Blue map from the last two elections. All voters would still have their say because they elect the state legislatures.

Progressives are at best 30% of the population in the U.S., but manage to maintain power by slick moves like the 17th Amendment.

It is time to take back our country and return to the Constitutional Republic that our founders gave us.

The Constitution may be old, but it is as relevant today as it was when it was devised; the proof is in the outrage of the Socialists who are so threatened by the mere though of returning it to it's original state, and by their continuing march to destroy what's left of it, just as they continue to attempt to destroy religion.

These are the two things necessary to get to the Socialist Eutopia that they dream of.

The time is now for Americans to take sides. You're either for the Republic of our Founders, or you're for the Socialism of the Progressives.

Choose wisely.

Chuck of VA 9:02AM January 04, 2011

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Latest Videos

advertisement