Glenn Beck vs. Doctors on Healthcare Reform

March 18, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Who you gonna believe? Sister Mary Catherine--who taught you how to spell and made you jelly sandwiches when you forgot your lunch? Doctor Bennett, who came to your bedside when you had the mumps, and had a Silver Star from World War II that he would let you see if you didn't cry when he gave you a shot? The kindly staff at your neighborhood hospital, who made you smile, despite the pain, as they put a cast on the ankle you broke in gym?

Or Glenn Beck?

Yes, as surprising as it sounds, given all the mud that Beck and his type have tossed on President Obama's healthcare bill, the folks in our communities who have devoted their lives to caring for us--doctors and nuns and hospital workers--have endorsed the legislation.

They don't spend their time drawing elaborate conspiracy theories on blackboards. They spend it helping you and me. And they think it's a good deal that kids can stay on their parents' policies for a few years longer; that you won't be turned down for health insurance if you have a pre-existing medical condition, and that we will no longer have to choose between draining our life savings or saving our lives when it comes our turn to face catastrophic illness.

They see the mandate to buy health insurance something like the mandate to buy car insurance--a hassle, but necessary, and just maybe not part of a communist plot.

There is stuff inside the bill that they don't like, and they roll their eyes at some of the political trade-offs and procedures used on Capitol Hill (who doesn't, and when was it ever different?), but the American Medical Association and the American Hospital Association and AARP and the Catholic Hospital Association and many other organizations who have participated in writing and amending the legislation have endorsed it--despite Republican fear-mongering.

They don't get the attention that, say, Sarah Palin gets when she rants about death panels, but that is not their fault. They are used to being unsung heroes.

Here is an example. One of the eleventh-hour debates is about abortion. The president's political foes would have you think that the new law will force Catholic doctors to perform abortion on demand, and then send you, the taxpayer, the bill.

Now it is true that the Catholic bishops think that the House version of the law is tougher than the Senate's, and so prefer it. Yet here is a fact: Both versions are tougher than existing law. If not, why would the Catholic hospitals, and 59,000 nuns, urge Congress to approve the Senate bill?

"Despite false claims to the contrary, the Senate bill will not provide taxpayer funding for elective abortions," the nuns, and dozens of groups of other religious leaders, said on St. Patrick's Day. "It will uphold longstanding conscience protections and it will make historic new investments…in support of pregnant women. This is the real pro-life stance, and we as Catholics are all for it."

A spokesman for the national anti-abortion league, when asked about the Catholic hospital association's stand, inadvertently showed us what is really at stake in the vote on healthcare reform. It's not about what's good for us--it's what's good for them. It's about politics. And scaring voters. And power. "No Catholic hospital executive has ever turned out hundreds of volunteers to man the phone banks," the flack boasted to the Associated Press. Well, he's probably right, the folks who run hospitals are pretty busy. Like Ross Perot once said, when he was criticized by Rush Limbaugh and other radio commentators: "I don't have time to listen to talk radio. I work for a living."

So, sure, you can go with Glenn Beck, cultist, and stash your "survival seeds" and gold coins in your basement shelter, and maliciously slander the Sermon on the Mount.

But for me, I'm sticking with Doctor Bennett, and Sister Mary Kate.

Tags:
Glenn Beck,
healthcare reform,
healthcare

Reader Comments Read all comments (34)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Of course the grand doctors that you paint in the picture are going to be for the Health Care Reform, Who do you think pays them... o that's right the GOVERNMENT. If i was a doctor and i was told that my salary would go up bookoo bucks, then i would be telling everyone i knew that this health care reform is good. Remember this though, Every time the government adds a law, a freedom is taken away. So when you get an IRS worker showing up at your door saying that the health care plan you have right now isn't good enough you need to upgrade to this one and it will only cost you $50 more a month. But, then when you say no i can't afford that health care plan, they fine you an X amount of money a month for not having the GOVERNMENTS DAMN HEALTH CARE. So when they say America is a free country, shes not, we have to do what the government says. Sure, this plan works for those people tat can't afford health care or have an outstanding hospital bill because then the "Obamabucs" will cover them. But, if we open up the borders for health care instead of it staying in one state the that will drive the competition up,and in tern the prices will drop an enormous amount. America is slowly getting back to the way we started in Europe. That is bad, we as a country need to turn things around and have the people control it, not the government.

Drake Siwicki of IL 4:04PM April 27, 2010

I've noticed how Farrell loves to slander Glenn Beck, it's great. When you pay attention to both, you quickly realize who's arrangements have merit and who's doesn't. By making such a big deal about him he give Beck even more name recognition and give people a chance to hear real arguments with proof to back it up.

Jerry of IL 3:24PM March 24, 2010

Your assertion that most physicians and other healthcare professionals support this monstrosity of government intrusion is absolutely based upon wishful thinking and a need to support your own way of thinking. I am a practicing physician who sees a large number of Medicare patients precisely because many of the other physicians in my area won't see them any more. In the state of Iowa where I practice the reimbursement rates are some of the lowest in the country and don't even cover our costs. I have had to hire additional staff just to handle the exponential increase in paperwork that has proliferated over the last 10 years alone. My patients are already expressing fear and concern that they will find it difficult to get the care they need in the future as more physicians stop seeing these patients due to the proposed cuts in Medicare. The New England Journal of Medicine recently published the results of a survey of practicing physicians that indicated up to 30% are seriously considering retiring from the practice of medicine should this bill become law. You do the math... 30% few physicians, 30+ million newly insured = longer wait times and reduced access to care. I won't even begin to comment on the fact that this monstrosity will bankrupt this nation for generations to come. I find your insinuation that physicians are more concerned with "maintaining their tee times" insulting. I work 70-80 hour weeks routinely and am never truly "off call". I make a comfortable living, but am not rich. Most of my colleagues are of like mind and to say that because the AMA supports this legislation most physicians support it as well is just wrong. The AMA's membership is at its lowest level in decades because they have become more concerned with photo ops and being part of the inside the beltway crowd of elites than they are with looking out for the interests of physicians and their patients.

Marc L. Wilkinson, M.D. of IA 8:12PM March 23, 2010

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Latest Video

advertisement