Why Democrats Cannot Give up on Health Reform Now

February 26, 2010 RSS Feed Print

By John Aloysius Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

If the Democrats on Capital Hill could caucus, and agree on a quick, magical, cost-free path to add about 5 million new jobs in the next six months, they would do so.

But they can't. The effects of the recession need to work themselves out. Aside from the capture of Osama bin Laden, there is no quick crowd-pleaser out there for President Obama and his troops in Congress.

Instead, they must pass their healthcare bill. Having gotten it this far, to surrender would be an invitation for political slaughter.

As usual, it's the Speaker of the House who recognizes this reality. Speakers know their members, and members know their constituencies.

"We can't say to them at the end of the day: `Well, we had an idea. We had a vision. We had a majority, but the process did not allow us to make a change for your lives,'" said Nancy Pelosi.

No, Democrats, you cannot.

"We have to represent the aspirations of Americans as they sit around their kitchen tables concerned about their jobs, the education of their children…and how they are going to pay their medical bills," said Pelosi, after yesterday's healthcare summit was over. "Those people who are…struck with illness or pre-existing conditions and the rest want us to act. They want results."

So the Democrats have two choices. They can push through the best bill possible, and go home and defend it with passion and conviction and, perhaps, take some losses in November. It is the sad reality of American politics that fear generally triumphs over hope at the ballot box, and the Republicans have done a great job raising fears. But Obama, at least, has flushed the Republicans from hiding. We now have two models from which to choose--and the Republican alternative looks sorrier every day.

Or, the Democrats can whimper and flail. They can lose their nerve and go home to face 1) spirited Republicans who will despise them no matter what they do, 2) Independents disgusted with their fecklessness, and 3) a whole bunch of disappointed Democrats who have better things to do than vote on Election Day.

It's the last group that Democratic office-holders need to start worrying about. They've voted for this bill. They own it. There is no way the Republicans will let voters forget that. Their best bet now is to pass it with a happy shout, and go into the midterm election with that indispensable element of victory: a proud and invigorated Democratic base.

"We need to have the courage," said Pelosi, "to get this job done." And the skill to tell us why. And then maybe the rest of us will reward that bravery in November.

Tags:
healthcare reform,
democratic party,
healthcare

Reader Comments Read all comments (27)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

John is correct when he states that failing to pass this bill is an invitation to political slaughter.

What he fails to understand is that passing this bill is also an invitation to political slaughter.

Failing to pass this bill angers the "progressives" who want this bill. Passing this bill angers the 70% of the voters who do not want this bill passed. Voters do want "health care reform" in a different form than the current proposals.

Difficult times for the Democrats. They have done a very poor job of explaining how this bill will lower costs for most folks. Unless they can do that their bill (or their party) is doomed.

Bob of TX 12:17PM March 02, 2010

mensa of Ca wrote: "Practically every western, industrialized country in the modern age provides universal, government-run health care."

So your lame-brained theory is that the United States should be like everyone else? Did you ever stop to consider that every western, industrialized nation's socialized medicine is crap? Long waiting lines, Little or no coverage, incompetent doctors, little or no testing leading to inaccurate/poor diagnosis, cheap/ineffective generic meds, subjective health commissions.

Do you realize that most are either broke or going broke? And you think it will be DIFFERENT in the United States? Please! You live in a utopian fantasy world.

Why did a canadian politician, Newfoundland Premier Danny Williams (the equivalent of a state governor) leave Canada to have his heart surgery performed in the United States? I mean, if Canada's socialized medicine is so much better, why did he elect to have his surgery in the United States? Simple, our health care is better.

Did you stop to think that practically every western, industrialized country in the modern age has depended on America's military might to protect them? Consequently, those nations did little military spending. What did they do with the savings courtesy of the USA? They plowed the savings into their social programs. So it should be easy to fund socialized medicine, yet even they are on the verge of bankruptcy. Canada's system is broke as a joke.

Furthermore, Mensa of CA wrote: "FOR SHAME, republicans who are against providing this basic, fundamental human right (health care coverage) to the masses of their own people...Americans who need, deserve, and want health care coverage."

Here's a quick civics lesson for you, Mensa. No where in the constitution are people guaranteed freedom from sickness and death? NOWHERE!! Repubs don't deny people anyting. If someone wants health care then they are free to go and get it.

Is it going to cost? Absolutely, but then again, nothing is free. Cost is a consequence to our freedom of choice. The fact that you and others don't have health care coverage is not my problem or America's problem. Why? Because those who don't have it made a decision at some point in their life that it wasn't that important . . . at least, while they were healthy. Oh, but now they suddenly want health care because their health is failing. Cry me a bucket!!

Folks who don't have health insurance, to mix metaphors, are like people who drive their cars and do not pay car insurance. Yet, they expect insurance companies to pony-up responsibility when they get into an accident. Absurd!

Are there problems with our health care system? Sure. But those problems pale in comparison to the problems that will be created by a massive entitlement program. Yet, despite the problems, we still have the best health care in the world.

david of ID 1:01PM March 01, 2010

Universal health care, justy like global warming, is becoming a religion for liberals. And what is the definition of a religion? Something that you fervently believe in for which there is no scientific proof........When was the last time government did something for you better than you could do it for yourself? Here's a new idea for all you libs out there - if you want something, go get a job, earn some money, and go buy it. Stop passing laws that require those of us who do have a job to pay for somehting you think should be a "universal right".

mad in texas of TX 9:50AM March 01, 2010

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Latest Video

advertisement