If Brown Beats Coakley, No Whining About Glass Ceilings

January 15, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (28)

By John A. Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

When reviewing Anne Kornblut's book about the glass ceiling for women in U.S. politics last week, I put my own two cents in.

Part of the fault for the lack of female presidential timber in this country, I argued, lies with women themselves. If women candidates don't run for president, they won't get elected.

I generally skipped the question of female voters, especially many younger ones, who don't see things through the same feminist prism as previous generations. But now we have a Massachusetts Senate race where the women's vote could determine not just the outcome of the contest, but the partisan makeup of the U.S. Senate and the fate of the Democratic healthcare reform plan. Let's visit the issue.

Much has been written and shouted and said about the healthcare bill. Put it all aside. This much is bankably true: It will benefit no one as much as it helps moms and kids. Especially single moms, working to raise a family in tough economic times, who may live the hardest lives in our society.

Forget all other "women's issues." If Martha Coakley loses the Senate seat, the healthcare bill probably dies. And according to the pollsters, the turnout and support of female voters is critical to Coakley's chances.

And so we have a great test case for American women. A female candidate is running for the U.S. Senate, where her vote could bring relief to thousands of struggling working moms, and their children, across the land.

For the women of Massachusetts--and America--it is time to put up or shut up. If you don't send money, work the phones, and get to the polls to vote, you deserve what you get. And then don't whine to me about glass ceilings.

Tags:
healthcare,
healthcare reform,
Senate

Reader Comments Read all comments (28)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

What a disgusting raw appeal to sex based voting.

formercommunist of CA 6:35PM January 20, 2010

What will you write tomorrow if women show up enmasse and Martha Coakley wins? I am a woman. I also have several chronic illnesses which makes me even more aware about the tremendously complex issues involving health care in the United States. I have been writing, blogging and making phone calls whenever and wherever I can on behalf of Martha Coakley. I am a registered Republican who is ashamed of the nasty turn this campaign has taken by conservative special interests from both inside and outside the state. I hope they are proud of themselves as the latest low note they are playing is an "anti-woman" venom-spewing tone. Your "women have only themselves to blame" is part of this hate-mongering tone.

BeachSaint of MA 9:08AM January 19, 2010

As our country is heading towards bankruptcy, businesses are afraid to hire people because of all the new socialist anti-business policies that are coming down the pipe. Government is the main sector that is expanding, thanks to the billions they have frittered away in the name of stimulus, and also paying off the people who got them elected. They take the peoples money and give themselves enormous retirement and pension packages amounting to in some cases millions of $, while they spend tens of millions to fly on private jets and do photo-ops in Denmark.

They were gonna soak the rich to pay for all this, but then they realized that they are the rich, so now they are going to soak the middle class and tax peoples healthcare to pay for their corrupt healthcare racket, concocted behind closed doors, were everyone makes out and tax payers are left holding the bag. Nothings wrong with some kind of a safety net, but they want to make it so people have a fundamental right to goods and services provided by others, which is undiluted socialism.

I live in Mass, and the taxes are out of control, and the’ve carefully hidden alot of it so you pay more for stuff, now they double tax alcohol to. While they drive productive business out of the state, the government programs keep expanding to no end, making people dependent on government and ruining the middle class to pay for it all.

To anyone who’s listening, we HAVE TO ELECT SCOTT BROWN on the 19th, and get some sanity and balance back in Washington. He’s the best option we have.

#33 Polk High of MA 9:55PM January 18, 2010

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Latest Videos

advertisement