Attacking Yemen Would Only Help al Qaeda Terrorists

December 29, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (11)

By John A. Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

In the frenzied overreaction to the attempted bombing of Northwest Flight 253, this morning's rant by Frances Fragos Townsend stands out. Townsend is a former assistant to President George W. Bush, who chaired the Homeland Security Council from 2004 to 2008. She should know better. But in today's Washington Post, she opines that "the American people are understandably fed up" with Yemen, which harbors the terrorists that equipped dim Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, and she suggests that we go to war in yet another Muslim nation.

That would make three: Yemen, Iraq, Afghanistan. Four if you count our aerial strikes in Pakistan. Five if, as some suggest, we bomb Iran.

I don't know what type of war Townsend is demanding. She says we should give Yemen an "ultimatum" before the "international community" goes in to "clean it up." But in my experience, when the "international community" does its cleaning, it's generally the U.S. Marine Corps and Army grunts who lead the way. Donning her figurative body armor—since I don't expect that she is prepared to join the first wave of U.S. troops as they go ashore—she declares: "The time for polite diplomacy is long past."

We will get to how "polite" we are in a moment. But for now, let's look at this from al Qaeda's perspective. Hounded and pummeled, and unable to launch the kind of spectacular terrorist attack it used to be known for, an al Qaeda coven in a global backwater takes advantage of Western greed and laziness and gets a lonely, crazed Nigerian onto an airplane. He fails to detonate his explosive device, and sets himself on fire.

This frantic failure takes place some 10 days after a string of successful U.S.-aided aerial and ground attacks on terrorists in Yemen claim the lives of more than 50 terrorists and militants. It was a sorry bit of retaliation until, remarkably, Americans transformed this bungling—an embarrassment to any potent terrorist group—into an al Qaeda triumph.

Once again, we are snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

Fear is what the terrorists are after. And who is whipping up our fear? Americans! Overreaction is what the terrorists are counting on. And who is screaming for overreaction? The American media, and partisan commentators like Townsend.

Has everyone forgotten that fine nest of al Qaeda terrorists that we just wiped out in Yemen? Or the good work that our spies and drones and special operation forces are doing in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Africa? Does no one comprehend how sources of intelligence and the quiet support of Arab regimes could be shut down by a Western invasion or bombing of a third Muslim nation? Or how many more crazed loners will rally to the side of radical Islam by the internationally televised spectacle of U.S. forces causing the unfortunate but required "collateral damage" in yet another Muslim civilian population?

Yemen is a wild, desolate country, with many ungoverned areas. Our "polite" strategy, in recent years, has been to enlist Yemen's government in the fight against al Qaeda. We give them money and military and technological assistance, and they help us find the bad guys, who we kill. It is what we are trying to do in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and what helped make the surge successful in Iraq. Can the U.S. apply more diplomatic pressure? Perhaps. But this is a delicate business since, unsurprisingly, the average Muslim citizen of these countries has a healthy suspicion that what the United States really wants is to boost Israel and control Middle East oil.

We are already fighting a war in Yemen—and in Pakistan, Sudan, and Somalia. It is a secret war that seems to be showing some signs of success and requires that we show discipline and shrewdness and intelligence. So by all means let's trash our success with a fit of vain, partisan chest-puffing.

Long ago, Osama bin Laden read us for the saps we sometimes are. The way to beat him is with brains, not empty ultimatums, or counterproductive "cleaning."

What kind of name is "Fragos," anyway? It sounds foreign to me. Has anyone seen her actual birth certificate?

Tags:
Yemen,
al Qaeda,
national security terrorism and the military,
terrorism

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

One irate individual, or even several, does not amount to a "frenzied overreaction," Mr. Farrell. Some of us believe it is convenient to call our fight against terrorism, from whatever location, a war on terror. I prefer to consider Yemen, Pakistan, Afghanistan and other places where terrorists operate, fronts in our war on terror. I am truly saddened by news of unintended civilian casualties in places where we are compelled to carry the fight, Mr. Al-Haifi. That is the big difference between our endeavor and that of those who threaten us. We value life more than death. If I thought for one moment that my nation was intentionally or carelessly killing or injuring civilians, I would denounce the effort. Of course, the other big difference in our motivations for fighting this war is that terrorists claim to be engaged in a holy war, while we fight out of a basic human instinct to protect ourselves and our way of life. I read your writing on the blog, Mr. Haifi. It is unfortunate that you did not express the same regard for the human casualties in our country and many other countries who were the deliberate, chosen targets of suicide bombers.

RetFed2k of CO 2:48AM January 01, 2010

It would be wise Mr.Al-Haifi,if these good "shepherds" rid their country of Al-Qaeda by helping U.S.Special Forces ferret out this scourge.As for collateral "damage" ,the leader of the P.F.L.P ,now dead thankfully, declared during the 70's that"there are no innocents"-I guess that fact slipped by you.

JP of TX 8:10PM December 30, 2009

While we don't need knee jerk attacks of the Bush/Cheney clones, the US does need to tactfully defeat the rising terrorist movement in Yemen. We can't be timid against the attacks from Yemen, and certainly need to take into account the PR used against us, as Hassan Al-Haifi points out. Muslim Terrorism is a fact to deal with. Some consider the only restraint fanatics understand is decapitation, and the trick will be to surgically strike but not by carpet bombing for all the cameras of the world to see.

In a long view this is a Muslim civil war on the Arabian peninsula coming back full circle. Thirty years ago Islamic fanatics attacked the Al-Masjid al-Ḥarām, holding hostage the heart of Islam and touching off the wave of Muslim Fanatic Terrorism we see to this day. The Saudis suppressed the incident and promptly exported the problem. The Saudis have long supported hardline Muslims and again its coming back to haunt them. The internal strife within Islam has tarnished the religion and as the fanaticism spills outside Muslim countries, the rest of the world needs to step in and stand up for stability in the Middle East hoping that a moderate Islam prevails.

Lawlessness in Yemen is not an excuse to allow al Qaeda to continue to fester there.

We should not forget that Osama bin Laden's family is from Yemen.

Joe of OH 2:20PM December 30, 2009

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Latest Videos

advertisement