Why Polls Are Wrong on Health Reform's Future Popularity

December 23, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (22)

By John A. Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Marty Nolan is one of the smarter guys to ever cover American politics for a newspaper, and so I pass along his thoughts on the political impact of the Democratic healthcare plan.

Marty's advice: Forget what the public opinion polls are showing now. And to a considerable extent, I agree.

The best features of the health bill—the security it gives to working families and the way it protects the rest of us from the terrible economic risks of catastrophic illness—were settled long ago. For months, they've been largely ignored in the 24-hour news cycle, and Americans have instead been fed a steady stream of stories about minor flaps like the abortion coverage.

I'll wager that some of the discontent measured by the polls reflects peoples' reaction to the news coverage, their traditional distaste for the lawmaking process, and their suspicion that Congress was never going to get the thing done at all.

Now, if things hold together for the next few weeks, the Democrats will have, as Jonathan Cohn notes, a fine product to sell and a premium opportunity—at President Obama's State of the Union speech—in which to make their pitch.

Once the legislation kicks in—and a family of four with an income of $50,000 sees its potential healthcare costs shrink from $25,000 a year to $10,000 a year—it's likely to be a favorite of working-class voters. And its long-term effect—guaranteeing basic healthcare—may, as Marty notes, prove quite popular.

But as I argued yesterday, the Democrats cannot just sell healthcare. The war and the economy and the country's soaring debt need to be addressed as well. There is a lot of talk among Democrats about coming back in the coming years to refine, tinker with, and add to the healthcare legislation. They won't get that opportunity unless they keep us safe, working, and confident about the future.

Tags:
healthcare,
healthcare reform,
polls

Reader Comments Read all comments (22)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I hope the Democrats do ignore the polls - then Nov 2010 will make the Mass. debacle look insignificant !

jeff of NJ of NJ 7:40PM January 30, 2010

The polls are not wrong, a majority of people really do not like the prospect of nationalized healthcare.

So WHY would they still want to pass it???

The Dems (and probably a number of Repubs) don't care, and the reason they don't care is because the 'US Health Service' will create the largest bureaucracy in the world -which they will migrate into once their political career ends. Once in the bureaucracy they will be in positions of power and accountable to no one, there will be no getting rid of them.

James of CA 5:37PM January 08, 2010

Thank you John for pointing out what seems obvious to Barak and many of us who struggle to understand what there is to love about our current health care approach - the downside risks of the current system go way beyond the benefits. In true Machiavellian fashion, the GOP is able to use the inherent complexity of any reasonable improvements to scare the masses that into believing any change is certain to end badly.

But once we see that our doctors don't disappear, that we're able to get the care we need when we need it and there are no death panels, we'll start to understand that the only ones who needed to fear this bill were the greedy insiders and mega corporations who grew fat on the current system.

The Democrats need to get this bill passed and in place as soon as possible. It's unfortunate that some Senators were able to extort sweeter deals that might have been possible if at least some Republicans were willing to compromise and vote for a reasonable, centrist approach. But once it because clear that regardless what was in the bill, the GOP would be against it, it became necessary to pull in every single Democratic senator giving some the power to extort over-the-top carve outs for their constituencies.

Tim Hadfield of IL 12:48AM December 30, 2009

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Latest Videos

advertisement