The Best Way to Learn the History of the United States

June 25, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By John Aloysius Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

I have a regret to share.

No, not about my Argentine mistress.

My sorrow is, sadly, far more mundane. It is that I got into this history gig somewhat late in life, and though I have been at it for 15 years, my amateur? undocumented? fledgling? status will forever keep me from being chosen to write a volume of the Oxford History of the United States.

But that won't stop me from reading, and recommending, these marvelous books.

The Oxford formula is simple. Take a great historian. Give them a contract, an "era" in U.S. history, and about 700 or 800 pages with which to play. Two late greats—C. Vann Woodward and Richard Hofstadter—hatched the idea, 40-plus years ago. The first volume was published in 1982.

And so we have had James McPherson on the Civil War (Battle Cry of Freedom), and David M. Kennedy on the Great Depression and World War II (Freedom From Fear), and James T. Patterson on the postwar era (Grand Expectations).

I've just finished Robert Middlekauff's wonderful study (the 2005 edition, revised and expanded) of the American Revolution (The Glorious Cause), which, with no intention of slighting the skills and heroism of Abe Lincoln, persuaded me that George Washington was, and must forever be, the Greatest American.

Now on my bedside stack: Daniel Walker Howe's What Hath God Wrought, the story of how the post-Revolution generations of Americans advanced, or bungled, the holy causes of freedom and liberty they inherited from the Founding Fathers. I need to read it fast. Due out in the fall is Empire of Liberty—the story of the Federalist and Jeffersonian era by Gordon S. Wood.

The series has had its ups and downs. It has failed repeatedly at producing a book on the post-Civil War era, one of our most turbulent, fascinating, and overlooked times. Three of the authors—McPherson, Kennedy, and Howe—won Pulitzer prizes, but occasionally, the historians assigned to the task have faltered, grown ill or died, or ended up writing quite another book. And so with The Age of Federalism, published by Oxford, Stanley Elkins and Eric McKitrick dazzled readers and historians and won a Bancroft Prize, but were not officially made part of the series.

A few critics have complained that the whole idea of the series is middlebrow, and the analysis unoriginal. In one sense they are right. Any volume that has to deal with an era, in encyclopedic fashion, runs a risk of reading like a James Michener novel, plodding through the years with paper heroes. The great dramas of battle, or political intrigue, are inevitably boiled down to unsatisfactory capsules. It takes an author of great skill, like the late Arthur Schlesinger Jr. did in his own history of the New Deal, to capture the essence of a politician or businessman in three or four unforgettable paragraphs.  

For foreign policy mavens, the Oxford editors have deviated from their formula, and issued From Colony to Superpower, by George Herring, a study spanning all of our history, on American foreign relations. I'm not sure how I feel about this. I like the original chronological approach. And when the editors asked Patterson to expand his take on postwar America to include the Nixon and Reagan and Clinton eras (Restless Giant), I think the Oxford folks made a mistake.

History needs distance. Even in Grand Expectations, his story of the 1950s and 1960s, you can see Patterson struggling a bit. I have to think there is just too much locked away in the presidential libraries and letters and diaries and unpublished memoirs and E-mails of recent years to allow us to properly and objectively analyze our own history—and there are far too many dominoes still falling to let us make judgments on the Clintons, or Reagan. Heck, the Nixon library just released more tapes the other day.

But these are quibbles. This series is jammed full of revealing statistics on social and economic trends, and great anecdotes about heroic, and average, Americans. And if you're the kind of reader, as I am, who likes to collect books for their reassuring heft—to be there when you just have to have a name or date immediately summonable—they look great upon the shelf. 

Check out our political cartoons.
Become a political insider: Subscribe to U.S. News Weekly, our new digital magazine.

Tags:
history

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

My teacher is good. She explains everything with details, however even if I pay attention I just cant't seem to get it. My question is, is there an easy way that I can understand U.S History?

Tiffany of FL 1:32AM December 24, 2010

I did enjoy some parts of this series, but didn't really miss a treatment of the post Civil War era all that much. Eric Foner's work, I believe is one that could never be improved upon within the scope of what you refer to as the "Oxford formula."

As for the American Revolution, I too am eagerly awaiting Wood's new book, since I really enjoyed "The Radicalism of the American Revolution." I disagree with Middlekauff's notion, as well as others, such as McPhearson in "1776" who cast Washington into the role of the central figure of the American Revolution. Without him, arguably the effort would have failed, though one could argue that Louis XIV played an even more important role. Without the French, let's face it - the war would have ended quickly and much differently. And the resulting financial crisis in France after the war helped to bring about eventually the French Revolution, which cast the American struggle into a continuity of events that helped bring the United States to a world stage.

Then again, I tend to, in general, resist the idea of attributing wide ranging historical events to single personalities. Almost always, when we look deeper, there are complex causes to be found, usually bound to the will or needs of large masses of people. With all of his polemics, this is one of the ideas of Howard Zinn that really has had an enormous impact upon the way I view history.

I also came to history late in life and spent some time in grad school on a non-matriculated basis, which was a wonderful experience. I know how it feels to have regretted not coming to something you have discovered you really enjoy much later in life than you would have hoped. I may use some of the academic skills I have developed in processing some extensive family research that my grandmother left behind into a coherent publishable work. There is some amazing stuff there. But whether it happens or not, I can still probably register as a substitute teacher at some local high schools - the possibilities are endless actually.

Bill Olsen of NY 5:34PM April 17, 2010

Be one of the wretched teeming on a far shore yearning to breathe free.Then get a leaf blower & wade across EL RIO .P.S Don't forget your pregnant wife and 12 children!

Patrick of NY 6:10AM June 28, 2009

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

No White Knight to Save Republicans

The GOP is stuck with Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, or Paul.

Latest Video

advertisement