'Outrage' Film Is Gay-Bashing in the Name of Gay Rights

May 8, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By John Aloysius Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

One thing we're going to miss, in the 21st century, is the quality of mercy.

Life is not, cannot be, just. If it was, children would not die. All but a tiny few of us would roast for our sins. And to quote the lovely Jennifer Nettles, this would be the very last country song.

But if human beings cannot be just, we can be merciful. We have that choice. And not too long ago, folks took mercy seriously. We believed in values like the Golden Rule, and lessons like the Sermon on the Mount. These days, the exercise of mercy is seen as a sign of weakness, or self-delusion.

I've been thinking about mercy today, after reading a review in the daily paper about a new documentary that has been released, called Outrage, in which director Kirby Dick goes around, a la Michael Moore, outing gay conservatives.

I suppose, on an intellectual level, I recognize the rationalization for this intrusion of privacy. A gay public official who votes against gay rights, some of my liberal friends would argue, needs to be exposed. The public has a right to know.

"They have a right to privacy but not a right to hypocrisy," says Rep. Barney Frank, on camera.

Well, I don't buy it.

Isn't it just as hypocritical to show selective tolerance? To reserve compassion only for those gay Americans who have the strength to come out in a still-hostile society? And to deny it to other gay Americans who, for a gazillion reasons having to do with family, faith, shyness, or job security, want to keep their sexual orientation private?

And by putting gay Americans—liberal or conservative, closeted or not—under such leering scrutiny, aren't we treating them all as freaks?

It is not just. It's cruel.

Worst of all, it's adopting the mean tactics of gay-bashing foes. In this particular debate, cruelty is not what we need. We've seen plenty of cruelty.

Enough with the public burnings.

In the years before World War I, my old friend Clarence Darrow was defending union militants charged with bombing nonunion job sites. Then some corporate goons were caught with dynamite, blowing things up to fix the blame on, and discredit, the labor movement.

The press went to Darrow, presuming he would issue a blistering condemnation of the company men. No, he said, they were just victims, like his clients, of an industrial system that was out of control. We needed more understanding, he said. There is plenty of condemnation to go around.

Darrow was right. Condemnation is cheap. What we always need a little more of, is love. And mercy. We remember them. Or should.

Check out our political cartoons.

Tags:
movies,
gay rights

Reader Comments Read all comments (37)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I feel somewhat tainted after watching this film this afternoon. Most of the gay investigators in the movie are sleazy journalists in a mantle of selfrighteousness and the politicians come across as more serious, adult people, especially the charming Governor of Florida -- who did seem to be in love with his new wife.

Joe of HI 6:40AM July 11, 2009

If you are a public figure who legislates on behalf of your constituents AND you go around telling others how to live their lives; telling them that they are living wrong and that you are an example of how they should live and that your constituents should vote for you because you live that example - then you should live that example. And if you don't, consistently, you are a not only a hypocrite and a liar but you are a manipulator who lies about who you are to gain power and stature and your manipulation should be exposed to your victims.

Debo of FL 8:07AM July 01, 2009

The writer missed the point of the movie. Targeted were politicians who publicly were anti gay. They were wanting to establish policies that would hurt gay people all the while indulging in gay activities. If those same people supported gays or at least did no harm to gays, then they wouldn't be targeted. You see, they targeted gays so gays targeted back. Oh wait, the writer understood that, he just doesn't like gays. Oops, sorry, I understand now. Thanks.

Funny that 12,000 gays have been kicked out of the military. More than 4,000 felons were accepted, a GED or HSD was waived and the max age for private raised to 40. So armed felons are now serving next to American sons and daughters. A couple of weeks ago, one of those felons murdered an entire Iraqi family and then raped and murdered their 12 year old daughter. Now the locals hate Americans. No gay would have done this. Americans are more afraid of gays than of the terrorists.

RDean of IL 1:33AM May 26, 2009

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

No White Knight to Save Republicans

The GOP is stuck with Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, or Paul.

Latest Video

advertisement