Ignore Limbaugh, Hannity and the GOP, the Obama Stimulus Plan Is a Good Start

February 11, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By John Aloysius Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

My pal Peter Gosselin has a graduate degree in money from Columbia University. He could have made gazillions as an investment banker, I suspect, but chose instead to waste his youth in the public service of journalism.

Peter specializes in explaining the mysteries of finance to money dolts like me (Is it Franklin on the $50 bill, and Grant on the $100, or the other way around?) in understandable English. He is very good at it. The New York Review of Books got downright dewy reviewing his 2008 book "High Wire," which warned of the fragility of our economy and forecast how and why this current recession is going to hurt more, and more of us, than other downturns.

I turn to Peter for lessons on the economy. Back in the early 1990s, when Washington and Wall Street were trembling at news of $100 billion deficits, and Bill Clinton was modestly raising taxes to pay off the debt Ronald Reagan ran up when luring the doomed Soviets into a spending race, Peter scoffed at my worry.

A hundred billion dollars is a lot of money, I said. So Peter drew a Little Circle, about the size of a quarter, and next to it drew a Big Wheel, about the size of a saucer. The Little Circle was the federal budget, and the $100 billion budget deficit was, of course, but a tiny piece of that little pie. The Big Wheel represented the rest of the American economy.

"Here in Washington we focus on this," Peter said, pointing at the Little Circle. "But whatever the federal government does is dwarfed by what is happening here," he said, tapping the Big Wheel. "If this wheel starts churning, it can make so much money, so quickly, that $100 billion is small change."

And then we watched it happen. The Big Wheel started turning and, in a flash, we were, all of us, rollin' down the river. By the end of the Clinton years the revenues from the Tech Boom had not merely erased the annual budget deficit, but Alan Greenspan was publicly worrying that we would pay off our national debt too quickly. (I didn't understand it then, and won't try to explain it now.) Folks from both parties tend to forget, but the Treasury was awash in so much revenue that in the 2000 presidential campaign Al Gore's Democrats promised whopping tax cuts that were almost as big as those offered by George W. Bush's Republicans.

That is the role of the Little Circle: to keep the Big Wheel oiled, to jump start it from time to time, and to offer insurance to those who get squashed by its momentum.

Well, the huge gains in productivity and the excitement over the new gizmos spawned during the Tech Boom ultimately ran their course, and the Big Wheel slowed down. But then the Tech Boom was replaced by the Housing Bubble and the Smiling Chinese Loan Sharks. Can we be honest with ourselves? We all paid small attention to the risks. When the Big Wheel turns, Americans know to party.

Now the Big Wheel has slowed again, and it's time to use the Little Circle and the Smiling Chinese Loan Sharks (would that be a great name for a rock band, or what?) to get it spinning. That is what the debate in Washington is all about: how best to use the Little Circle to jolt the Big Wheel.

The stimulus package is a jump start. The bail-out represents long overdue oiling, repairs and maintenance. Three or four trillion dollars is indeed a lot of money, but then there is a lot of rot in the Big Wheel. What is scary, this time around, is how much the Wheel has slowed, and how much it's proved resistant to the antics of the Little Circle.

So that is why, were I a congressional Republican, I would be listening to the Republican governors of California and Florida, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and the out-of-work folks back home—and not to cynical infotainers like Rush and Laura and Sean, who are laughing, all the way to the bank, at our gullibility.

Not this week. The grown-ups here know that a few hundred billion dollars in tax cuts, by themselves, won't do. It's time for boldness—to borrow big and spend more, just like Ronald Reagan, in the service of a patriotic cause. It's every shoulder at the Wheel. The voters will remember who didn't line up with them.

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.

Tags:
Obama administration,
economic stimulus

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If you have to do it, you might as well do it right.

flu pandemic preparedness of AZ 6:42PM July 05, 2009

When the stimulus vote is nearly completely party-line, it's easy to see why each side did what they did, but the GOP has more at stake here. If the plan fails, GOP members of Congress can tell you that they voted against a bad plan during their 2010 campaigns for the house and senate. The problem for the GOP is that, unless we are in the beginning of another Great Depression, the recession started about a year ago and past economic cycles are a good inidication that the U.S. should be well on its way to an economic recovery by 2010, in which case members of the GOP will tell you that the recovery had nothing to do with the stimulus package.

Republicans were in a lose/lose situation when it came to voting for this bill and it had nothing to do with what's best for the economy.

jpdjag of MD 1:24PM February 17, 2009

Yes all the kool-aid drinkers of the world are uniting under their leader Barry Soetoro. It is nice to see.

Obamanite: If their IQ was one point lower they would be rocks. When they gather together they have the ability to lower their IQ hence the term, "Dumber than a box of rocks". Can be haters of free speech when those who oppose their ideas are outspoken. Hence pie throwing and other obnoxious behavior. Typically found in socialist circles. (aka circle jerks)

Jeff of WI 11:32AM February 15, 2009

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Latest Video

advertisement