Stimulus No Votes Were a Republican Mistake

January 29, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (26)

By John Aloysius Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

I think that, looking back, the Republican Party will conclude that it made a political mistake in opposing President Obama's economic stimulus plan in lockstep unanimity.

I say that as someone who has argued here, in agreement with the GOP on several of the points (It's not enough stimulus. The bill bears hidden agendas. The big construction projects will take too long. There should be more tax breaks.) made by House Republicans in yesterday's debate.

Yes, I recognize that, having been reduced by the voters in two successive elections to a regional minority faction, the House Republican need something to define themselves, rally the troops back home and satisfy their talk radio blowhard allies.

Some of the Republican strategists, no doubt, looked back to how George Mitchell led the steadfast Democratic opposition to George H.W. Bush, forcing him to swallow his "read my lips" pledge and okay new taxes, and how Bob Dole and Newt Gingrich resisted Bill Clinton's big deficit reduction package in 1992. In both cases, the determined resistance scored big in the next election.

But that was then. Generals should be wary of fighting yesterday's battles. If there is one thing that Obama and his troops proved in the last two years, it is that his message of national unity and common purpose has political oomph. Especially among younger voters, who have less patience for political games. Republicans, now more than ever, need to reach out to a transformed American electorate. They should worry more about expanding their base, not just stroking it.

Yet now, one week into America's new start, in a moment of national crisis, the Republicans have declared, by not giving the president a single lousy vote, that this was not about the country, not about your job, or your family or your hard-pressed business, but all about them.

All about politics.

All about jockeying for the next election.

Even if the Speaker was totally rolling them, the Republicans would have been wise to let some of their members join the majority, and make the opposition of the rest of them appear more principled.

Instead, they look churlish. And with that vote, have defined themselves in ways that could come back and haunt them.

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs

Tags:
economic stimulus

Reader Comments Read all comments (26)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Since 11 Democrats, or there about, voted in locked step with all the Republicans, looks to me like the YES vote is the partisan vote and should be the vote we cast dispersions upon.

Gary Fenney of WI 5:29PM February 02, 2009

This pkg is PORK. We need a real pkg that will make real jobs and nt "do nothing: government jobs that do not produce. We need jobs that produce a product that can be sold.

Thomas Long of OH 2:53PM February 02, 2009

The stimulus pkg, as it is now is just full of bad, bad spending. If it were aimed at job creation I would be all in. I do not want any more "do nothing: government office jobs to be made. How about some real jobs that actually produce something that can be sold ?

Chris Long of OH 2:28PM February 02, 2009

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Latest Videos

advertisement