The Washington Post, Online News, and the Obama Inauguration: You Get What You Pay For

January 22, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

By John Aloysius Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

I have spent some time in recent weeks praising The New York Times, as an example of the journalism we will come to miss if we don't recognize that paid and trained professionals do a better job than amateurs at finding and presenting the news.

In doing so, I've neglected to say much about my hometown paper, The Washington Post—the other big dog in the nation's capital—which is going through its own transformational changes.

The Post has its issues. The paper and its website must learn to love one another. Its op-ed writers appear to have lifetime tenure, and seem older, on average, than Supreme Court justices. The newspaper has a reprehensible anti-union slant. It has lost a lot of top talent in recent years, and replaced it too often with lesser lights. Seeing Dana Milbank in Mary McGrory's shoes is like watching Will Ferrell perform King Lear.

But there is life in the ol' Post yet, as last year's Pulitzer juries noted. And this week's coverage of the inauguration has been exceptional.

To take but one example, pick up the 38-page special section "Dawn of a Presidency," that was published on Tuesday. It has taken me two days to read the whole thing—it is that rich.

David Maraniss previewing his upcoming biography of Barack Obama. The inestimable Wil Haygood, chronicling the lives of an African-American family. The superb Henry Allen, on Obama and oratory. And others.

(Hey Marcus—Can't we get these guys in the paper more often?)

Then there were the dozens of Post reporters who fanned out around the city in the early morning hours of Tuesday, worked the pavement through the day and the night's inaugural balls, and reported what they found in Wednesday morning's edition.

What web site is going to hire high-paid poets like Maraniss, Haygood and Allen? What Internet search engine will employ a small army of reporters—pay them a wage, and benefits, on which to raise a family—and send them out to blanket a city on an historic day like Tuesday?

At first blush, free news seems great. But you get what you pay for.

Tags:
journalism,
media

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

That "pink" dinosaur is an example of journalism? Yea, and the Daily Koss and the Huffington Post are unbiased, mainstream news sources.

Man, if you're gonna blatantly shill for the hard left, drop the "journalist guise".

R.L. Schaefer of CA 7:19PM January 22, 2009

Tenured and high-priced columnists do not make a newspaper work better in the 21st Century. You pretty well know, for instance what Krauthammer is going to say before he says it. Same with several others.

Might as well invite in all the adjunct temps to the op-ed page. That's what universities are doing, after all.

of 4:28PM January 22, 2009

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Latest Videos

advertisement