Assessing the Inauguration Speech of Barack Obama

January 21, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By John Aloysius Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Unlike most Americans, who watched Barack Obama on their flat screens at home, or on the giant Jumbotrons erected on the Mall, I was in the press seats at the Capitol and saw him take the oath of office not as an image, but in person, though from some distance away.

And his inaugural address was not, I decided, a great speech.

Nor, I concluded, after navigating my way out of the great crowd and the cold and to my desk, did the transcript of Obama's words especially dazzle me.

There was no historic sound bite, as far as I could tell—no Rooseveltian dismissal of fear, or Kennedyesque challenge to "Ask not what your country can do for you. ..."

I did not feel, as I did four years ago listening from the same spot to George W. Bush's ideological challenge to the world's tyrants, that there was much historic ground being broken—word-wise, that is.

But then I started watching the clips of Obama's speech online. And I came to the conclusion that this was a very good speech indeed. And I settled upon Reaganesque as an adjective.

Obama is like a great film actor. He can impart, with a furrowed brow or lifted hand, or a shake of his head, considerable meaning to his words. He has great presence, and bearing.

He can give heft to phrases that look clunky or trite on paper—"we gather because we have chosen hope over fear"—through the skill of his delivery.

And in those instances where he chooses to be poetic—as in the Sandburgian ode to "the risk-takers, the doers, the makers of things" or the Lincolnesque reminder that "the fallen heroes who lie in Arlington whisper through the ages"—it makes it that much more effective.

Later, I spoke with Curt Smith, who worked as a wordsmith for George H.W. Bush, and he shared some of my thoughts.

"It was not a great speech—not lilting, not exalting," said Smith. "It was however an ideal speech for what he wanted to do. I think he set the tone superbly."

The new president may not need punchlines. Said Smith: "I am struck by Obama's speeches. We less remember quotable lines than the temper of the speech, the tenor of the speech—and I think he hit that exactly."

I agree. As Ted Widmer, another former presidential speechwriter (from the Clinton White House) told me, Obama began his new job with, "All in all, a great 20 minutes of work for the American people."

I give it an "A."

Tags:
speeches,
Inauguration,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

For too long, Americans have chosen style over substance. Here was a speech of substance. He did not tell us what we wanted to hear, he told us what we needed to hear. Hard work, sacrifice, nurturing our children, being responsible, making hard decisions and accepting the right and responsibility that comes with being a citizen. As he said, childish things must end. We needed a sobering splash of cold water in our faces to realize that the rest of the world is leaving us behind. We are no less intelligent or inventive as we were last week, but soomewhere along the line, we lost our way.

For all the catchy rhetoric of George W. Bush's inaugural speech, where did that get us? War, recession and the loss of our good name. Stop looking for a hug, when we need a shove.

Rachelle Akuffo of MD 1:14PM January 23, 2009

Although everyones thought about the speech is as valid as the next, i believe the speech was a stroke of a genius, superbly executed, making everything that he is going to stand for clearly. He called everyone to remember what a great nation America is and what needs to be done to keep it so. Its such a shame some do not share the same sentiments towards the speech. But one has to remember we are all different inour beliefs but to me this is Obama era.

takudzwa of GA 1:07PM January 23, 2009

I agree with your analysis. There were some good moments but no sound bites to capture for history. I find this amazing given the "We did it!" attitude that pervaded the District when he was speaking (I was in the crowd). The general sense given by media and supporters was that not only is he the first black president, but he is the best ever to come, a savior of sorts. I would expect better from such a remarkable person. The delivery was great; without a doubt he is a great orator. However, tone, inflection, rhythm, etc. cannot be captured in text. This is the age of media, so that may never again matter.

As for Obama's attempt to tie his image to Lincoln. I don't think he has it in him, but I would think it wonderful for him to act like such a great republican.

Dion Stempfey of VA 5:36PM January 22, 2009

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Latest Video

advertisement