Barack Obama, Gay Marriage and the Rick Warren Inaugural Fight: Letting Him Talk is Smart Politics

December 19, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (91)

By John Aloysius Farrell, Thomas Jefferson Street blog.

Here is a bit of calculated political advice for gay Americans. You can take it or leave it.

I think you should drop the Rick Warren attacks.

Not that Rev. Warren, a professed Christian with a large religious audience, doesn't deserve to be taken to task for his un-Christian behavior. And that goes for the other mainstream faiths which, not content to dictate the definition of marriage within their churches, want to apply it to the rest of us.

Haven't any of these guys read the Sermon on the Mount? Or the First Amendment?

Yet the truth of the matter is that we advocates of gay rights, and gay marriage, got complacent. We were slowly winning the arduous political battle of converting hearts and minds here in America, and we forgot, for a crucial moment, the strength of the country's Puritan and Papist traditions. And we got beat in California.

Hurt. Anger. Regret. All justified.

But nobody said this was going to be easy. When have your lives been easy? Time to redouble our efforts.

Now, why should we give Warren—and Barack Obama—a pass?

Well, Obama is just doing what he said he would. He promised to try and heal and unite a country that the current administration took delight in dividing. It is something, quite simply, that American needs right now. And uniting means welcoming and accepting differences. It is what we want our countrymen to do for us, and we need to do it for them. Like marriage, pluralism is no one-way street.

During the last campaign, Obama and the Democrats (who are marginally better on gay issues than Republicans) reached out to Evangelical voters, and to conservative Catholics, to try to close this division. Having Warren say a prayer at the Inauguration is a small symbolic nod to these religious conservatives. Hopefully, to defuse suspicion and hatred.

This is, ultimately, a political battle. Judges can interpret state constitutions. But legislatures, and initiatives like Proposition 8, can trump judges. In the end, we are going to have to persuade the vast voting public, a lot of whom are religious, to ratify an historic change in the civic institution of marriage.

I think we can do it. I believe Americans are good, fair-hearted people. The last election certainly says so. And, among young Americans, who are growing up in a different time than their parents and grandparents, gay rights has the broad support of Mom and Apple Pie. So, in the long run, we win.

My advice: better to lay off Warren, and channel your energy (and exploit the strong and deep support of the music and motion picture industries) to drown American in a campaign of evocative Internet advertisements, like the YouTube ads that united a generation behind Obama, and touched so many of their parents as well. And get your voters to the polls.

As a tactical matter, there is surely a place in campaigns for employing grievances to enflame one's troops and to raise the level of participation and energy. It may also serve the cause, at this moment, to sting the Democrats and the incoming Obama administration, so you are not taken for granted.

But the practical question that gay political leaders must face—with more detailed data than I have—is whether it is wiser to use this incident to rally their base, or to continue to show middle America the moderation and reasonableness that has earned such political good will for LGBT Americans in recent years.

Warren's willingness to extend his hand to liberals is noteworthy. And moderates and conservatives, in weighing a rapprochement, will be studying the liberal response. There is an opportunity here.

Yeah, I know it is tough. Why is it always the bruised minority that has to act nobly in America?

It's just the way things are. Until we change them. And we will. We are.

Tags:
LGBT rights,
Barack Obama,
Inauguration

Reader Comments Read all comments (91)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Okay all you enraged people. Get your head on straight. It's not about people having the same rights as others, because EVERYONE has the right to marry someone of the opposite sex. It's not about people pluging in their religion into politics, because He was taken out of authority a long time ago. It's about morality. Some people say morality is relative, which no one in their right mind should believe because it is immoral for me to kill whoever I feel like. So there is a standard, and frankly, just look at nature, from penguins to lions to even flowers have a male and female. Think logically for one second, I know people don't use logic much anymore, but if it were suppost to be GLBT, than why can humans only reproduce through male and female intercoarse? If you take a step back you can see that only people who's mind has been perverted, by society or themselves, think that it's not that way.

So you're asking the most powerful government in the world to say it's okay for something that is counter human to be accepted as good and right by authority. I'm sorry, but no matter how much you push "toleration" it shouldn't happen. You wouldn't and you shouldn't tolerate someone doing something that is wrong. If someone is wrong they are "holding an incorrect opinion about a person, thing, or matter"1

It's really not that complex. So, seriously?! live the way you're suppost to, and stop complaining.

1. Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

Sergio Castillo of FL 1:05PM March 18, 2009

well what i think about obamas saying about gay marrige is that is fair it should not be against the law because what about if someone of obamas reletives wanna get marriege amd they are gay they are ganna be allowed to be marride but not gay marrige thats no fair i thing gay marrige should be allowed in this state becaz if not alot of people are ganna leave to get married in a other place n they are ganna come back well thats my opinion i dont know about others!

maria of CA 5:06PM January 23, 2009

I think that Gay Marriage should be proven why is because they are people just like us. And we don't need to treat them no different than we treat the people who do marry me and women. In judge them about who they want to be with in life and spent the rest of there lives with. I think you give them i chance because people are going top be with who they want to be with.

You shouln't treat them like thee anmails that's in the zoo. It's wrong i think poeple should get marry to who they want to be no matter what color they are as long as there happy.So don't judge people because they want to be with men and men and women and women.It's wrong and you should be ashame of your self. Think let them live there life you are so why can't they live it the same way you do...

Raven McJoy of AR 10:27AM January 06, 2009

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Latest Videos

advertisement