Liberals Are Patriots, Unctuous Joe

August 13, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Sen. Joseph "Unctuous Joe" Lieberman, now working as a warm-up act for the Republican Party, introduced its nominee in Pennsylvania this week by defining this year's election as a choice "between one candidate, John McCain, who has always put his country first...and one candidate who has not."

Let's dismiss, for the moment, the howler that McCain is some sort of sanctified snowy-haired patriot—"The One," if you will—who never makes political calculations.

You can judge for yourself whether McCain's decades in Washington, his involvement in the savings and loan scandal, his ties to lobbyists, his pandering to the Religious Right, his support of President Bush and his flip-flops on taxes, the environment, and other issues are all examples of putting America first.

What's objectionable (though not really surprising) is Lieberman's self-righteousness.

Unctuous Joe has always had a bad case of holier than thou. This is the guy who, as it became clear that he was going to be dumped by his fellow Democrats in his last campaign, announced that he would run as an independent because the fate of his state, nation, and planet required his sage presence in Washington.

But now he's making the damnable suggestion that those who disagree with him are lowlifes who put self before country.

Let me tell you something, Joe (and John, for, after all, Lieberman is merely spouting the McCain campaign talking points). I know many liberals. On some issues, I'm liberal myself. And liberals believe—with as much, maybe even more, conviction as conservatives—in the strength and goodness of American values.

Liberals believe all men are created equal. They fight for the Bill of Rights. They believe in the emancipation of women, and of those whose skin is darker than white. They try to follow the Golden Rule, and the lessons of the Sermon on the Mount. And they believe that these things make America exceptional and fine and essential in a world that knows too little mercy, justice, and freedom.

Any tin-pot Putin can build an army; bomb cities, shock, and awe. A nation's real might is in the power of its ideals.

I don't know what was in Barack Obama's heart when, in 2002, he opposed the Iraq war.

I do know that presidential hopefuls like Hillary Clinton and John Edwards and John Kerry and, yes, even saintly John McCain, voted with some mix of calculation and faith for a foreign policy disaster.

And I know that, at the time, the safe vote was for war.

And so the guy who put his country first just may have been the man who had the guts to say, "No."

Tags:
Joe Lieberman,
politics,
John McCain

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

What the heck---he was unsuccessful running as VP as a Democrat. So why not try running for VP as a Republican? And if that doesn't work, there's always perennial candidate Ralph Nader. Give the guy credit for being persistent.

HillbillyBill of TN 7:07AM August 15, 2008

Joe Lieberman is a man who is a Jewish American. He stands in the Judeo-Christian tradition and unashamedly spoke with John Hagee at Christians United for Isreal. The religious right should pray he be John McCain's running mate. He practices what he preaches, is truly independent and honest in thought and action, and will stand staunchy behind Isreal, and Bible believers as myself know this is important. He stood boldly as a Democrat and denounced on the Senate floor Bill Clinton's public affair while President. I am proud of Joe Lieberman and think him even more viable as a candidate than John McCain. Joe Lieberman for VP, and President!!

Susan Morris of TX 5:08PM August 14, 2008

POLITICALLY CORRECT AND POLITICALLY HONEST WEB BATTLE SITES

The vast majority of the politically-correct web sites resemble Pravda in their Marxist propaganda subversive to the family, Christianity, nationalism, and the Constitution; and their distortions of American history, and censorship of opposing information. Earlier they supported either Leiberman Neo-Lib Hillary or Podhoretz Neo-Con McCain; now, after Hillary’s shocking defeat by the Kennedy Liberal, Obama, these Crypto-Neo-Marxists are desperately united behind McCain.

Predictably, when Obama is finally elected, they will cunningly strive to make him serve their political and economic interests. They will stop their slandering and hate-baiting, and start slavishly ingratiating themselves; then systematically subject him to intensive psychological conditioning, political coercion, and bribery. Some, in early anticipation of Obama’s imminent victory, have already started deserting McCain, back-stabbing Bush, and seeking refuge in mock patriotism.

The politically defeated New York Times, Boston Globe, Washington Post, and USA Today leading these strategic changes are coming up against a powerful new defensive Zeitgeist that is emerging in America. With it, the Age of Politically Correct Speech is ending, and an Age of Politically Honesty Speech is starting. This wonderful patriotic escalation in the Cultural War, a historical turning point, suggests that their change in subversive strategy will provoke increasingly stronger counter-offensives on the many politically-honest web battle sites.

Jeugenen of 2:27PM August 14, 2008

John A. Farrell

John A. Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. An award-winning Washington reporter, he has written for The Boston Globe and The Denver Post and is the author of Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Century and an upcoming biography of the great American defense attorney, Clarence Darrow.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Latest Video

advertisement