Polls Show More Than Tea Party Anger Toward Government

May 5, 2010 RSS Feed Print

By Jodie Allen, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Anti-government crusaders have found ample confirmation in a recent Pew Research Center poll showing that Americans’ trust in government is about as low as it has been in half a century: only 22 percent now say they can trust the government in Washington almost always or most of the time. Support for a more activist government role in addressing national problems continues to decline along with satisfaction with the state of the nation’s economy.

Discontent with government performance is not, however, a new story in this land of ours. With the exception of a brief “rally round the flag” dip post-9/11, about the same relatively small majority of the public (now some 56 percent) has said they were frustrated with the federal government since the ’90s. Still, as the report notes, the segment of the public that holds intense anti-government views--those saying that they are “angry” at the feds--while still small, now matches the high reached in October 2006 (20 percent).

But while other major institutions have not been the focus of organized protests for irate citizens, many score no higher than the government on the public’s report card. Banks, financial institutions, and large corporations earn no more positive rating than the feds in terms of their effects on the way things are going in the country.

And, as is often the case with regard to Americans’ views of public policy, the story gets somewhat more complicated when you get down to specific cases.

Only 40 percent now want the government to get more involved with the economy, for example. But back in March 2009, when the specter of total financial collapse loomed large, the public took a different view, opting for more government control by a 54-to-37 percent margin. And when it comes to the particular case of regulation of the way major financial companies do business, the clear majority (61 percent) wants more stringent government regulation, a level virtually unchanged from last April (60 percent).

This same inconsistency between assessments at the general level and those relating to the particular is, of course, also seen in the public’s views of the federal budget. Surveys routinely find the public supportive of reducing the deficit--Pew Research's annual public policy priorities survey, released in January, found 60 percent saying that reducing the budget deficit should be a top priority for the president and Congress, up from 53 percent a year earlier. But, as noted in a recent Pew Research report, when it comes to specific program cuts, that support fades away. (A recent CBS News/New York Times survey, for example, found that by a two-to-one ratio Americans oppose cuts in health and education spending.)

Nor are people’s actual interactions with government uniformly, or even predominantly negative. A recent Pew Internet & American Life survey found that a large majority of online Americans (82 percent comprising 61 percent of all U.S. adults) had accessed information and services at a government website in the previous year. And the great preponderance of these users, about 8 in 10, said that their online interactions with the government led to a fully (51 percent) or mostly (28 percent) satisfactory conclusion. Only 5 percent said they had accomplished none of what they set out to do.

For that matter, most Americans (70 percent), whatever their views of government’s trustworthiness, still think the government is a good place to work; and 56 percent say if they had a son or daughter getting out of school they would like to see him or her pursue a career in government.

And on a personal note, I will observe that in the course of a move from our home of many decades to a condo apartment last week, I spent many long and frustrating hours listening to a mixture of recorded apologies and muzak while trying to effectuate the transfer of our phone, TV, and Internet services to our new abode by the relevant private sector entities--this despite efforts to smooth that transfer beginning three weeks prior to our relocation which also necessitated prolonged telephonic episodes. By contrast, the switch of our postal deliveries, including mail forwarding, was accomplished in a few minutes online and was fully operational the very first day of our move. Nor am I alone in having a positive experience with the U.S. Postal Service--no fewer than 83 percent of Americans view the government-run service in a favorable light.

Tags:
financial regulation,
government,
economy,
Tea Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Meet the Unemployable Man

by David Wessel

Saturday, May 1, 2010

provided by

The betting is that the Labor Department's Friday snapshot of the job market will show that employers added workers in April, perhaps even that the unemployment rate fell.

That would be good news, but not good enough. It's hard to exaggerate how bad the job market is. Here's one arresting fact: One of every five men 25 to 54 isn't working.

More from WSJ.com:

• The Unseen Figures of Your Funds

• In Wake of Oil Spill, BP Stock Looks Cheap

• Leaving Your Roth IRA to the Kiddies

Even more alarming, the jobs that many of these men, or those like them, once had in construction, factories and offices aren't coming back. "A good guess…is that when the economy recovers five years from now, one in six men who are 25 to 54 will not be working," Lawrence Summers, the president's economic adviser, said the other day.

This is not one of the many things that can be blamed on subprime lending, inept regulators or Goldman Sachs. "The Great Recession has reinforced prevailing labor market trends that were under way long before the recession," David Autor, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology economist, observed in a recent paper commissioned by two Democratic-leaning think tanks, the Center for American Progress and the Hamilton Project.

Demand for workers who haven't much education -- which includes many men, particularly minority-group men -- is waning. A shrinking fraction of them are working. Some are looking for work; some have given up. Some are collecting disability benefits or an early-retirement pension. Some are just idle. On average, surveys find, the unemployed in the U.S. spend 40 minutes a day looking for work and 3 hours and 20 minutes a day watching TV.

For 50 years, the fraction of men with jobs in what once were prime earning years has been trending down. Over the same decades, the share of women who work has been rising, a significant social change that lately has cushioned the blow of Dad's unemployment for many couples.

Women have suffered less in this recession. They were more likely to be in health care and other jobs that weren't hit as hard as construction and manufacturing. They are increasingly likely to have the education so often required to get or keep a good job these days.

Popular Stories on Yahoo!:

• World's Richest Mothers

• America's Most Stressful Jobs

• Unhealthiest 'Health' Foods in America

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More from Yahoo! Finance

That's good for their families. But will there be good-paying jobs in the future for prime-age men, particularly the ones who don't go to college?

Americans have worried for decades that the economy won't produce enough jobs. But the economy always provided. As farm jobs were eliminated by mechanization, factories hired more. As factories increased productivity and moved work offshore, more Americans got jobs in health care and other services. And the economists said to all those who had been worried about perennial, persistent unemployment: We told you so!

Yet nothing in the textbooks says that the supply and demand for workers will intersect at a wage that is socially acceptable. At the high end, demand for skilled workers and those who rely on their brains will return when the economy does. At the other end, jobs in restaurants, nursing homes and health clubs -- the jobs that are hard to automate or outsource -- will come back, too.

In the middle, there will be some jobs for workers without much education, for the plumbers, electricians and software technicians. But not enough to go around.

Men who in an earlier era would have been making good money on the assembly line are, and will be, working security or greeting at Wal-Mart, jobs that almost anyone can do and thus jobs that don't pay well.

If they're working at all. Today, 6.5 million workers have been out of work for six months or more, and that includes only those who are still looking for work. History suggests the longer they're unemployed, the less likely they are ever to work again. Faster economic growth would help a lot, but won't suffice.

One way to resist these market forces is to reduce the supply of workers who aren't in demand and increase the supply of workers who are. That is, educate more and better: Fix K-12 schools, improve worker-training programs, strengthen community colleges, give more aid to college students. All this is wise, but most of it will take a long time.

Another option is on the demand side: Force employers to be less efficient so they have to hire more, or limit imports of goods that threaten jobs of less educated, prime-wage men -- solutions with unwelcome side effects.

The government, Mr. Summers said, can increase demand for labor in the short run. Spending more public money on infrastructure, he argued, will both strengthen the economy for the future and employ out-of-work construction workers.

A third option is surrender to market forces and tax the winners to subsidize the losers. Sending checks to idle men is unappealing, but the government could do more to supplement wages (or health insurance costs) for those who work at low wages.

Each approach has shortcomings. So does doing nothing. Sidelining a huge part of an entire generation of men would waste human potential, create economic misery for their families and fuel political discontent.

American fallen apart because there is no good leader to lead it a good country in a bad hand leader would never be good for it people or for the stinky whole world of CA 8:08PM May 06, 2010

I recommend an excellent article about the political context of the Tea party, its development, and likely evolution at:

http://funks2.wordpress.com/2010/04/16/the-trip-to-nowhere-on-the-tea-party-express/

FunkUniversity of IL 11:28PM May 05, 2010

There are millions more of fed up and good and mad Independent Voters,that are not tea party members that have had it with the

Barack Hussein Obama and Democrat Controlled Congress and Big

Government as well. And so,don't forget that many of them,are

newly minted independents that used to be Democrat or Republican

like myself and we strongly oppose many of the Socialist and out

of touch with reality disasterous policies of the pathetic total

failure out of touch with reality Barack Obama Administration and Liberal Socialist Democrat Controlled Congress as well...The

mainstream newsmedia and Democrats have totally underestimated the voter anger and will apparently only realize it on Election Days 2010 and 2012 when we throw the bums out and Democrats will

soon discover why the voters oppose Illegal Alien Amnesty,the

lack of Jobs and tanked Economy and our troops still being in

Afghanistan and Iraq on election day.

Ralph of AZ 9:05PM May 05, 2010

Jodie Allen

Jodie Allen

Jodie Allen is senior editor at the Pew Research Center. She joined the Pew Center from U.S. News & World Report where she was a managing editor and the business editor and also wrote a bi-weekly column on the political economy. She came to U.S. News from Slate Magazine, where she was the Washington bureau chief. Before joining Slate she was the editor of Outlook, the Sunday commentary section of the Washington Post. She has also been an editorial writer and business columnist with the Post.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Concordia Ship Disaster

The Costa Concordia luxury cruise ship keeled over after it ran aground off the coast of Italy.

advertisement