• Comment (22)

John Boehner Right to Sound Alarms on Losing the House

April 26, 2012 RSS Feed Print

House Speaker John Boehner did not mean to set off a panic, but he did mean to issue a strong and loud wake-up call earlier this week when he said on Fox News that Democrats had a "one-in-three chance" of winning back the lower chamber of Congress in November.

It won't be easy for Democrats. The Republicans hold 242 seats, the most for them since 1946. Democrats would need to pick up a net 25 seats to retake control. Even if President Obama wins re-election in November, only once since World War II has the party that won the White House gained more than 15 seats in the House during the same election.

Polling experts don't expect the gavel to change hands. Republican pollster Glenn Bolger has guaranteed the Republicans will retain control, and even nonpartisan political analyst Charlie Cook rates a Democratic pickup "highly unlikely."

[See a collection of political cartoons on the 2012 campaign.]

And Democrats won't be able to focus solely--or even chiefly--on this goal for two reasons: The president himself likely will be locked in a tight battle until November, and Republicans have a better chance of retaking the Senate than Democrats do of retaking the House. Democrats must defend 23 Senate seats this cycle to 10 for Republicans, and seven of the 10 that will be open in November belong now to Democrats.

On the other hand, Speaker Boehner is right to be concerned--and not just because a good offense starts with a good defense.

First, down-ballot races won't catch the attention of voters and, more importantly, donors until mid-fall as focus now turns to the presidential race, conventions, and the American Idol-like fixation of the media on who Romney will select as vice president. This enables Democrats in tossup-or-close-to-it districts to amass significant war chests and organizational advantages in districts that don't heed the speaker's warnings.

Second, the National Republican Campaign Committee's cash-reserves advantage has all but dried up in recent weeks as the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has amassed its strongest cash position since 2002.

Third, when we draw closer than the 10,000-foot level, a surprising number of Republican lawmakers are vulnerable for various reasons. The Rothenberg Political Report currently rates 13 House races as complete tossups--and Republicans hold six of those seats. Moreover, two of the four races in districts it rates "Tilt Democratic" are Republican held; as well as three of the five in districts he rates "Lean Democratic" and three of the eight in the "Democratic favored" column.

[Scott Galupo: Mitt's Play-It-Safe Stump Speech.]

Meanwhile, 60 Republicans must stand for election in districts won by President Obama in 2008. And Democrats currently hold just seven of the 39 closest races in districts that tilt, lean, or favor Republicans. In other words, far more Republicans are in dangerously Democratic districts than Democrats in Republican districts. Add in the fact turnout is expected to be low outside of the presidential battleground states, and several traditionally Democratic districts that went Republican in the wave election of 2010 could revert to form, which would be bad for Republicans.

It could get even worse for Republicans if President Obama somehow builds a substantial lead a month or more out from the election. The president has not demonstrated significant coattails to date, but that could change if he takes a clear lead because, according to Alan Abramowitz, a senior columnist with Larry Sabato's voter analysis organization, straight-ticket voting is at a 40-year high.

The chances may not be quite one-in-three Democrats could retake the House in 2012. But Speaker Boehner is right to sound the alarm. The time for Republican candidates to redouble efforts at fund-raising and organization building is now, while neither presidential campaign has captured the momentum.

Waiting could be dangerous--which was exactly the speaker's point.

Tags:
House of Representatives,
Senate,
John Boehner,
2012 presidential election

Reader Comments Read all comments (22)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Republicans played a risky hand over these last four years and it hasn't worked out for them. They've got too many activist radicals among their elected ranks, too many inexperienced politicians, and have focused on using overly incendiary rhetoric and made too many promises to fringe elements in their party. Now they've nominated a weak candidate in the face of a not-particularly-vulnerable incumbent. The same old Rovean tactics won't work forever.

Frank of OH 6:15PM May 01, 2012

As an independent voter, I predict Mr. Obama losing as POTUS this November in a landslide victory for the Republican opposition. The "sitting on their thumbs" Democrats, who have enjoyed their majority in the Senate, will also relinquish their hold to the Republican Party. The 'pubs in the House have introduced bill after bill to enhance economic growth, but the Dem-controlled Senate simply will not even look at them. If anything, the Dems are the real "party of 'no'"!

America is angry, period.

I live in a medium-sized town in California and the general economy is flat on it's back and it is looking more bleek as each day passes. Homes are still foreclosing left and right and businesses continue to permanently close their doors to join those already thousands of empty and boarded up shops, stores, and warehouses. Our economy is in very serious jepardy and Mr. Obama has done nothing to improve the situation. The fact is, his policies has only worsened any chance for any economic recovery.

I would say that if Jimmy Carter had had a second term in office, Mr. Obama is it!

Goodbye, Mr. Obama

....and don't let the door smack you in the a-- on your way out!

Gene Faraday of CA 8:53AM April 29, 2012

Libs like brucetee will point out high numbers buma has with blacks, women, etc. They WILL FAIL to mention THEY WERE MUCH HIGHER when buma was elected.

buma had a DECREASE in popularity with groups they brag where buma is doing SO well. This paradox is lost to them. Is not advantageous politically to a liberal weak mental mind...

Then as I showed brucetee can not grasp material he reads in links. As I point out in "Bill Hedges of MO 6:21PM April 28, 2012". With SO LOW comprehension blue must appear red, while yellow must get mistakened for green by brucetee...

Bill Hedges of MO 2:05AM April 29, 2012

Ford O'Connell

Ford O'Connell

Ford O'Connell is a Republican strategist, conservative activist, and political analyst. A frequent commentator on Fox News, CNN, and other broadcast media, he worked on the 2008 McCain-Palin presidential campaign. He is the managing director of Civic Forum Strategies and the chairman of CivicForumPAC. In 2010, he was named a “Rising Star” by Campaigns & Elections magazine.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Latest Videos

advertisement

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.