Mitt Romney's 'Very Poor,' Self-Inflicted Wound

February 2, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Within 12 hours of notching the second biggest political victory of his life, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney really stepped in it when he informed CNN's Soledad O'Brien that he was "not concerned about the very poor."

Are Romney's comments defensible? Of course they are. As the National Review's Jonah Goldberg notes, Romney was attempting to crib from former President Bill Clinton's playbook and he failed miserably at it.

If Romney wins the GOP nomination, which appears likely, could the Obama propaganda machine use this comment along with several others to create a montage of negative ads that portray Romney as a an out-of-touch rich, white guy? You bet, and I suspect it will to the fullest extent of its creative powers since the president is unable to run for re-election on the merits of his record.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Mitt Romney.]

I can easily see Axelrod and company using the O'Brien interview as a sequel to Mike Dukakis and the tank or John Kerry and his windsurfer. I might wish to go back in time, like Sam Beckett in Quantum Leap, and prevent Romney from doing the interview in an effort to fix the situation, but my fear is that the better comparison is to Bill Murray in Groundhog Day and that Romney will likely offer similar elitist gaffes again and again.

Having monitored Romney extremely closely, both in 2008 and in the present, the former Massachusetts governor still seems incapable of grasping one of the cardinal rules on politics: What you say is generally less important than how you say it and the language you convey it in (or in Romney's case, how it is received by others, particularly independents).

Will Romney recover from his most recent rich, stiff guy gaffe? Yes. Notice I didn't say "white," because trust me, Donald Trump, who is comfortable in his skin, probably could have artfully talked his way out of this one, especially when O'Brien gave Romney the chance to further explain his comments.

[Vote: The Donald Trump Endorsement—A Blessing or a Curse?]

Some on the right will argue that Romney will never get this stuff down, and will continue to pine for the likes of former Gov. Jeb Bush until the cows come home. I, on the other hand, remain hopeful but realize that time is not on Romney's side. It is clear that he still needs more time to marinate in the GOP primary, but it's unclear if the process will ever get this candidate to a point where he can convince voters that he can understand their pain even if he can't "feel" it himself.

My advice to Romney: Stop kneecapping yourself and stick to the script. The mainstream media and Team Obama are well aware of your weaknesses and will continue to exploit them to their collective advantage. You may never publicly be comfortable in your skin, but please remember, as the potential GOP standard-bearer, you are fighting with one arm behind your back, so please be mindful of how others receive your words.

Tags:
2012 presidential election,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

For every polling agency that offers a statistic, there is another polling agency that

"proves" the first polling agency was inaccurate. For instance, at the end of George W. Bush's presidency, his popularity was 19%, according to National Polls. Yet, Gallup did not indicate the same numbers as other agencies:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/113770/bush-presidency-closes-34-approval-61-disapproval.aspx

For those that show Obama would lose the Presidency if the polls took place today, other polls indicate:

http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/poll-obama-s-approval-up-beats-all-comers-if-election-were-today-20120214

Which poll is correct? I wrote a comment about this very topic several weeks ago that discussed polls are often subject to political and financial pressure from influential, wealthy groups who, ultimately, benefit financially from polling results (indicating either positive or negative results, whichever the group finds most beneficial to their goals).

http://www.nationalpolls.com/obama/

I do not know which poll is telling the truth either, but that does not seem to stop some people from seeking out very spurious sites, and trying to perpetrate the idea that these spurious sites ARE telling the truth. How do you KNOW? You don't, actually. Stop calling people ugly names, as if they are wrong and you are right. You really do NOT know whether these sites are accurate or not accurate.

Instead, why don't you spend some time signing petitions to return truth to the media (newspapers, magazines, T.V., radio, video, films, and recordings)? Democracy ends when media is not truthful. Do you care at all that the United States, allegedly a Democracy, is no longer obligated to report accurate news?

ann keenan of MI 8:46PM February 15, 2012

brucetee

Keep looking for the union label. Found less & less:

February 2, 2012

Underemployment is 18.7%, up from 18.3% in December

Underemployment, a measure that combines the percentage of workers who are unemployed with the percentage working part time but wanting full-time work, surged to 18.7% in January. This is a worsening from the 18.3% of December but is still below the 19.0% of a year ago.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/152432/Unemployment-January.aspx

Bill Hedges of MO 12:48AM February 04, 2012

to the nameless poster.it would seem that you failed to get the gist of my post.just pointing that if( and i grant it's big if ) economy keeps on the up turn,it wont matter who the republicans nominate in august.

bruce b of NV 9:52PM February 03, 2012

Ford O'Connell

Ford O'Connell

Ford O'Connell is a Republican strategist, conservative activist, and political analyst. A frequent commentator on Fox News, CNN, and other broadcast media, he worked on the 2008 McCain-Palin presidential campaign. He is the managing director of Civic Forum Strategies and the chairman of CivicForumPAC. In 2010, he was named a “Rising Star” by Campaigns & Elections magazine.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement