• Comment (21)

Florida Is Do or Die for Newt Gingrich

January 26, 2012 RSS Feed Print

As the bare-knuckled brawl dubbed "Armageddon" intensifies like a category five hurricane, the current polling ahead of Florida's January 31 Republican nominating contest indicates that former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich are locked in a tight contest. The intensity of the campaigning suggests that both are treating next week's contest as a death match. 

A loss in Florida would certainly be a devastating blow for Romney and could send the Republic establishment into a Chernobyl-like meltdown, possibly even scrambling to find a replacement candidate at the last minute, as former McCain presidential campaign adviser Steve Schmidt and others have suggested. And while many on the liberal left would love to see chaos ensue among the right, the reality of the situation is that Romney, whose campaign is fashioned for the long haul, can technically afford to suffer another defeat in this round, whereas for Gingrich, losing in Florida could put him down for the count.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Can Anything Stop Mitt Romney?]

Coming out of South Carolina last weekend, Gingrich had essentially burned through most of his resources. True, the momentum from Gingrich's South Carolina victory has afforded him the opportunity to accumulate a significant amount of new campaign capital, including a second $5 million infusion to the Gingrich aligned Super-PAC, Winning Our Future, courtesy of casino mogul Sheldon Adelson's family. But the former House speaker will likely need all of these newfound resources and more given the daunting landscape he faces in Florida.

There are reports that Romney has already accumulated a sizeable lead in the Sunshine State, thanks to absentee ballots and early voting that took place in the state prior to Gingrich's decisive win in South Carolina. Gingrich is also not aided by the fact that Romney has systematically flooded Florida's 10 media markets with ads. And while it is true that only a small percentage of the 1,144 delegates needed to secure the nomination have been allocated, it doesn't help Gingrich that Florida and its 50 delegates are a winner-take-all proposition rather than a proportionally allocated outcome.

[Read the 5 Things to Know about Florida]

For these reasons, Florida is a defining moment for Gingrich's presidential bid. As ABC News's Michael Falcone and Amy Walter are quick to note,

Winning the top prize [in Florida] means more than just delegates. It will show unmistakable momentum heading into the rest of the primary season and could go a long way toward sealing the deal for either one of the contenders.

As a neutral observer, I am not naïve enough to think that winning in Florida will seal the nomination for Gingrich—in fact, not by a long shot. But win or lose in the Sunshine State, Gingrich will have again seriously depleted his campaign resources, and the momentum that comes with victory will go a long way to replenishing his campaign coffers, much to the chagrin of Team Romney.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Newt Gingrich]

Should Gingrich lose Florida, he will be low on resources and heading into a series of contests that do not appear to be very favorable for the former House speaker either. The Nevada caucus, considered to be a Romney stronghold, is next on the docket followed by Maine, Colorado, and Minnesota. I'd add Missouri to this list, but Gingrich failed to qualify for the ballot in this nonbinding contest.

There may not be ropes and turnbuckles around the stage for tonight's debate in Jacksonville, Fla., but the candidates and the audience are sure to have an intensity that will rival a WWE SmackDown event.

Tags:
Florida,
2012 presidential election,
Newt Gingrich,
politics,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (21)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

[p]South Foremost The state of texas College offers you students the chance bring in a associate’ohydrates level a single of numerous various and stimulating areas of study . The upcoming lets out – Cal king Kong, Contemplate Lovely women, In Jackson Five – tells us which usually the fact that the pros will be constantly pushing get you started of how to travel to its much-loved gifts with Christmases to return . Nick’'s .

Robwkf01 of MI 12:09PM April 29, 2013

Robert Foley of FL:

Ron Paul seems like a very nice person. I am concerned, however, about three of Ron Paul's policies and would appreciate your thoughts on the following accusations some make about Ron Paul:

1. Ron Paul denies being the author of racist statements made in his published papers, even though he acknowledges they WERE in his papers, but he was not the one who wrote these statements.

2. Ron Paul feels that the U.S. should take care of and be concerned only about itself, and establish a policy of isolationism with other nations.

3. Ron Paul feels the Federal Government is far too big, and many Departments, Offices, etc., should be eliminated. Dr. Paul also feels that there are far too many regulations imposed on citizens by the Fed. Gov.

I am also wondering about this as I have not seen this in any media information: Is Ron Paul in favor of "Citizens United"? Does he feel that corporations have the same right to be citizens of the U.S. as human citizens do?

I have also not seen any comments by Ron Paul about the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). I see he is not a member of this organization (which is a relief to me), but do NOT know if he agrees with ALEC's policies of creating and passing legislation, at the state level, along with Corporate Heads, Lobbyists, and Governors, Senators, and Representatives from the Republican Party.

I also wonder why Ron Paul, although he seems a reasonable man, is rarely praised by a majority of voting citizens? What do you think is bothering citizens about him?

ann keenan of MI 1:08AM March 03, 2012

Polls, schmolls!

If biased media mongrels, Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly dislike Ron Paul, then he must be the one for President.

If biased Rush Lumbaugh-mouth dislikes Ron Paul, then he must be the one to be elected president.

Dr. Ron Paul is likely to run as a third party candidate and my vote will be there for him.

I'm convinced Obama, Romney, and Gingrich are only there to rob as much from the American citizens as they can possibly can, so your vote for either of those three will not change a thing for any of us in this country.

View his very reasonable answers on the Jay Leno Show:

http://www.dailypaul.com/193814/the-tonight-show-with-jay-leno-the-complete-ron-paul-and-joe-rogan-interview

If one HAS to keep in tune with these so-called "polls", then view THIS ONE:

Poll: Who Won the CNN Republican Debate?

January 26, 2012

Ron Paul (93%, 6,858 Votes)

Mitt Romney (3%, 243 Votes)

Rick Santorum (2%, 173 Votes)

Newt Gingrich (2%, 93 Votes)

http://www.ronpaul.com/2012-01-26/poll-who-won-the-cnn-republican-debate/

Biased, you say? What proof would one possibly have with any other "bought-and-paid-for" poll?

Dr. Ron Paul for President of the United States, 2012

...where your independent vote will count!

Robert Foley of FL 8:31AM January 30, 2012

Ford O'Connell

Ford O'Connell

Ford O'Connell is a Republican strategist, conservative activist, and political analyst. A frequent commentator on Fox News, CNN, and other broadcast media, he worked on the 2008 McCain-Palin presidential campaign. He is the managing director of Civic Forum Strategies and the chairman of CivicForumPAC. In 2010, he was named a “Rising Star” by Campaigns & Elections magazine.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Latest Videos

advertisement

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.