Linda McMahon's Raw WWE Past Hurts Her in Senate Smackdown

August 11, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

The 2010 elections may be remembered as the year of the self-funded Republican female candidate. As every American who has not been living in a cave or in a locked basement knows by now, billionaire Meg Whitman of eBay fame is self-funding her run for governor of California to the tune of $100 million so far. She is expected to plunk down another $50 million, mainly on TV and video ads, between now and Election Day.

But Whitman’s business background is as thrilling as a dial tone, when compared with the circus-like, soft- (or not-so-soft) core porn and violence-riddled empire that gave Connecticut Republican senatorial wannabe Linda McMahon the financial freedom to self-finance her run. She made her fortune by locking arms with her calculatedly lowbrow wrestler husband Vince McMahon. Together they made millions by converting World Wrestling Enterprises into a font of sexually-charged, violence-tainted, “entertainment” supposedly about wrestling. After all, would you want your children watching it?

[See a slide show of 11 hot races in November.]

I absolutely adore BeyondChron writer Irvin Muchnik’s take on WWE’s financial success as follows:

I have described the creative genius of Vince McMahon, Linda’s husband, as that of cutting out the middle man, ending any pretense of dignity, and giving the people exactly what they want: homophobia locked in mortal combat with homoeroticism.

How McMahon intends to live that down in the general election is beyond me. She’s already spent $26 million of her own fortune to grab the senatorial nomination (which she did last night). During her campaign, she bragged about turning the former squalor of TV wresting from pander to PG (for the last two years the network has gained a PG rating). But there are still all those earlier years of McMahon ownership to live down.   

For one, according to ABC News:

In 2001, McMahon appeared on stage, forcing WWE wrestler Trish Stratus to get on her knees and bark like a dog.

For another, for many years the McMahons exploited independent contractor status to avoid having to pay wrestlers as staff employees:

For decades, armed with the best lawyers money can buy, WWE has gotten away with the fiction that its wrestlers are not employees--not only cheating these sweat-of-the-brow assets out of basic protections and benefits, but also stiffing governments out of payroll taxes.

Her Democratic opponent, Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, has some self-created vulnerabilities of his own. He has been forced to correct a statement that he served “in” Vietnam as a Marine reserve, to say that he served “during” the Vietnam War. 

In either event, the race to replace reluctantly retiring long-timer Sen. Chris Dodd is going to be fun to watch. [See who supports Dodd.]

Tags:
Richard Blumenthal,
Chris Dodd,
eBay,
Linda McMahon,
Connecticut,
Meg Whitman,
2010 Congressional elections,
California,
Congress,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Linda McMahon won. Imagine home folks know her well.

Give link on " Most all GOP are rich" as opposed to Democrats. Sounds like guess work to fit your politics.

Bill Hedges of MO 8:46PM August 11, 2010

But many are not. Most all GOP are rich. Kennedy's family had been rich since his father's bootlegging business during prohibition. So what? Kennedy stood up for the poor and those in need. That's better than being rich and just a pig, isn't it?

steve of IL 8:24PM August 11, 2010

Linda McMahon won. Imagine home folks know her well.

No rich in Democrat party. Teddy used his own money to spend in his campaign. Right ?

Bill Hedges of MO 7:41PM August 11, 2010

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

advertisement