Shirley Sherrod Shouldn't Overshadow Financial Reform

July 23, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

As I write this story, “Shirley Sherrod” is the most popular U.S. story on Google News and this is what I cannot stand, or understand, about new media.

A good woman, and Agriculture Department employee, makes a speech five months ago. A video of her speech is edited to make it look as if she made racially-insensitive remarks, which she did not, and after being posted online by a right wing blogger it goes viral. First she gets fired, then the president steps in and apologizes to her in a phone call Thursday. The whole affair goes global, as if little of real substance is happening in U.S. politics today. The only person, in my humble opinion, who truly benefits is the blogger who is now a household name. For the sake of not spreading his name any farther than it has already gone, I will not rename him herewith.

Who cares? I guess in a very minor way it’s interesting that the president became personally embroiled in the controversy. But wouldn’t you rather have your president working on things that impact your life? I would, and that stands even if I don’t agree with his politics on many issues.

President Obama on Wednesday signed the most comprehensive financial regulatory system overhaul since the Great Depression. I’ve studied up on some of what’s in the new law. I’d like to learn more. Instead, I’m spending my time and yours writing about Shirley Sherrod. Welcome to new media.

Tags:
financial regulation,
Wall Street,
USDA,
Barack Obama,
race

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

What the real problem here is the media's "rush to judgement" over the blogger's clip, and government's knee-jerk reaction to try to protect itself by firing Ms. Sherrod without even learning the facts.

Events are reported at LIGHTNING speed nowadays, and people seem to work overtime to keep up with that pace! If this "non-event" had been "outed" back in the 1960s, it would have died a natural death before anyone ever heard of it because Walter Cronkite and other serious journalists of his ilk would have poked and prodded a moment, checked a fact or two-- perhaps even called Ms. Sherrod to speak with her first-- then the non-story would've dissipated quietly.

There must be something more important than tearing down public officials to show that they are not as "noble" as their reputations suggest. Who is behind this, and why? What new "toxic avengers" seek revenge-- and against whom, and why?

Sheila

Sheila of NJ 10:34AM August 06, 2010

It interests me. We must face THIS DILEMMA head on.

Must we be in someone's shoes to feel the pain - so maybe someday, we'll learn to feel empathy. [Not to be confused with Pity]

PW of NY 12:28PM July 31, 2010

Is in search of a person concerning Shirley Sherrod situation...

What's up !!

Bill Hedges of MO 11:42AM July 23, 2010

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

advertisement