U.N. Women's Health Conference Must Focus on Education

June 7, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (10)

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Washington D.C. is the focal point starting today for a three-day gathering of United Nations and NGO officials all dedicated to the improvement of maternal health. There are many, many topics on the agenda including elimination of fistula and the use of microbicides (in the form of vaginal spray or gel) to prevent the transmission of AIDS. According to France 24:

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was expected to address the gathering later Monday by video, and Melinda Gates, wife of Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, was due to announce major funding for women's and children's health initiatives from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Over three days, some 3,500 conference participants from 140 countries will look at progress that has been made in improving global maternal health and assess the challenges that remain.

Supporters plan to use the conference as a launching-pad to raise 12 billion for women's and children's health worldwide. I wish them nothing but good luck in that venture. But at the same time, I hope the United Nations has not been cowed by the United States religious right into decreasing its support for family planning education and provision of birth control pills. 

Of course we want to prevent the suffering and death that women and children endure in developing nations. At the same time, we want to educate uneducated women so they are no longer dependent on outside support for their family planning and health care needs. I have produced a lot of coverage of family planning in countries such as Morocco, Peru, Mexico, and Egypt. The story is always the same. Women with no education produce, on average, more children because, A) Their children are more likely to die of childhood diseases; B) they have no skills to earn a living outside the home; and C) their children are their Social Security--their kids support these women in old age.

This is not the case for educated women in developing nations. And the sooner we work to spread education, the sooner poverty will be eradicated, both at home and worldwide.

 

Tags:
UN,
Bill Gates,
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation,
birth,
AIDS/ HIV,
women's health,
Hillary Clinton,
birth control

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

No, neighbor, I'm not talking about LDS people. Although I'm from New York, I've lived here for 45 years and have come to appreciate their general willingness to be open to ideas. It's those few on the religious Right who attempt to influence public policy on matters like sex education, gay rights/marriage, abortion that I have in mind. That they often aren't open to challenging exchange of ideas and try to block, say, planned parenthood abroad by limiting what our tax money can be used for--well, here I do object. Ours is a diverse society, not a closed one. To be educated is to accept that diversity and understand that we'll not all agree on all policies and issues. Different strokes for different folks, right?

On the matter of education and poverty, I have no hope at all, nor did I say, that "everyone being educated ends poverty." Everyone being educated might move us in the direction of ending nonsense being trotted out as wisdom, but all education can promise in relation to poverty is a way up from it. (The only thing that will ever end poverty is REAL reward for hard, hard work of whatever sort. There's not a lot evidence of that anywhere, is there?)

I appreciate your comments, David.

Ron W. Smith of UT 3:58PM June 08, 2010

You wrote: "Education, to them, is dangerous, and they do all they can to insulate their children and brethren from any such exchange. Therefore, before we go forth as an "enlightened" nation, maybe we ought to be certain what that means."

Please expound. Seeing as your from Utah, I assume that you are implying the LDS religion. But that can't be the case unless you ignore that the church is a huge believer in education has several universities, and encourages it's members to pursue educational endeavors. So, please expound. Also, please enlighten us as to how everyone being educated ends poverty. I'm intrigued to know your responses to these questions.

david of ID 1:11PM June 08, 2010

It's not always that I find something to agree with in Bonnie Erbe's posts. Today, though, I can agree with two things for sure.

First, I too, hope those on he religious "right" haven't the same influence they did under GW Bush. Family planning is as necessary as the planning of gardens or budgets or athletic events. Information on family planning should freely be available to everyone, here or elsewhere. Withholding information that we have that could be helpful, and which recipients can choose to use or not, is a form of censorship no enlightened nation should tolerate. (And I say all this in spite of my own wiewpoint on abortion: legal but RARE.)

Second, education is always a good idea, and if eradicating poverty (a big order) can be achieved that way, our country should be in the vanguard promoting it in every way and wherever we can. Right now in America, though, there's a lot of confusion about what education is. Some people fear it because cherished beliefs are up for grabs in the open exchange and challenging of ideas central to education. Education, to them, is dangerous, and they do all they can to insulate their children and brethren from any such exchange. Therefore, before we go forth as an "enlightened" nation, maybe we ought to be certain what that means.

Ron W. Smith of UT 12:55PM June 08, 2010

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

advertisement