Is the Washington Post's News Sexist?

May 24, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (11)

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Washington Post ombudsman Andrew Alexander had an interesting post on sexism at the institution he writes about. He gave several examples of recent pieces of writing in the paper which drew reader criticisms for gender bias. Most recently he cites a review by TV critic Tom Shales, known for his lavish use of language to take down TV programs with which he is not in love, of a news PBS public affairs program. (Full disclosure: I too host a PBS public affairs program) and an interview it aired with former President Bill Clinton.

Shales later apologized in an online chat for saying that the female co-anchor

looked as though she would have been much more comfortable in Clinton's lap.

Alexander went on to quote other Post references which may be found here.

But the most interesting part of his article, to me, was a study from 2008 which discussed the Post's declining female readership. It said, in part:

The study also said a content analysis of roughly 1,200 Post stories found that women were the focus of only 18 percent of them, although they comprised slightly more than half the area's population. The same analysis found that "men are quoted almost three times as often as women in the paper."

The study recommended the Post produce journalism "that creates an expectation among female readers that the paper is being published with them in mind."

I canceled my subscription to the Washington Post years ago and would also cancel my current subscriptions to the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times if only my husband wouldn't caterwaul in response. He's stuck on paper journalism, while I moved on years ago to the Internet for my daily dose.

The reason I dropped the Post years ago is because, quite frankly, I found the paper boring--especially its Op-Ed page. The writing was turgid and the opinions blasé. Maybe it has improved since then, but I'll never know because I'm in subscription dropping mode.

Tags:
sexism,
gender bias,
media,
Bill Clinton,
Washington Post

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If you think that "The Washington Post" isn't feminist enough, then you must also think that "Pravda" during the Soviet Union's heyday wasn't Communist enough.

Brendan of VA 5:42PM February 15, 2011

Millions of gallons of crude oil are leaking at this very moment and ruining the gulf coast. North Korea is provoking a war. The economy is in the tank and may collaspe before are very eyes. Iran will have nukes before long and war with Israel is very real. Our soldiers are in harms way on the other side of the world.

All of this and ERBE chooses to write about sexism. This is why nobody takes radical feminist like mssss Erbe serious, in fact most just laugh and move on which is the ultimate insult to her over inflated ego.

karl of MA 2:26PM May 26, 2010

Looks like there is more than one person here who can't follow a thread!

enzo of IN 10:08PM May 25, 2010

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

advertisement