U.S. Doctors Wrong on Female Genital Mutilation Among Immigrants

May 11, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (33)

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Believe it or not, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) thinks it's OK for immigrant parents to subject their daughters to a mild form of female genital mutilation (FGM). This is more evidence our nation has gone mad over immigration and is allowing immigrants to commit all manner of crimes that would be illegal if performed by a native-born citizen.

The AAP issued a report saying, in essence, it's better to allow parents who are going to maim their daughters' private parts to inflict a "ritual nick" than to send the girls overseas (back to their home country) for the traditional form of mutilation--a "surgery" performed by midwives and other non-medical personnel which maims girl's private parts for life. According to the anti-mutilation activist group Intact America:

The AAP report--which urged changes [to current law] to allow a “ritual nick” of girls’ genitals so families don’t send their daughters overseas for a full genital cutting--came out the same day that two congressmembers--Democrat Joseph Crowley of New York and Republican Mary Bono of California--introduced legislation (The Girls Protection Act, H.R. 5137) that would make it illegal to transport a minor girl living in the United States out of the country for the purpose of female genital mutilation.

Genital mutilation is illegal in the United States, and for good reason. But we're so overly sympathetic to Asian and African cultures that still practice mutilation that we don't want to "offend" them by making their followers adhere to the same laws the rest of us here must abide by.

This attitude is nothing short of insane. Before allowing people to immigrate to the United States, we should question them about their child rearing and cultural beliefs. If they admit they would perform such an act on a daughter, they should be denied entry into this country. Further, their citizenship should be revoked if they participate in such acts of child cruelty.

Immigrants enjoy a privilege to become U.S. citizens. No foreigner has a "right" to U.S. citizenship. We should be much more selective about who we allow to emigrate here, and allow in persons who are going to contribute to our economy and enhance our culture, not degrade it.

 

Tags:
doctors,
immigration reform,
children's health

Reader Comments Read all comments (33)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Please note that the two most famous opponents of female genital mutilation also oppose male genital mutilation (or circumcision):

" The same universal human right to an intact body that I have fought for on behalf of women and girls must apply to boys as well, especially those too young to make an informed decision about the integrity of their bodies.

How can it be wrong to surgically alter the genitals of a baby girl without her consent but okay to surgically alter the genitals of a baby boy? ". -Soraya Mire, Somali filmmaker and FGM campaigner, 2009

"I think male circumcision is worse than an incision of the girl." "You should leave the child as he is as he comes out of the womb" - Ayaan Hirsi Ali source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VsnVmPbgjk

Maybe we should listen to these brave and courageous women?

Whose Body, Whose Rights? of MA 4:26PM June 02, 2010

I've never supported the idea of circumcision. I remember first hearing about it as a child and feeling appalled.

Imagine how I felt after recently learning of FGM. Where, after the fact, a woman is almost guaranteed to feel no sexual pleasure. It's incredibly rare for a women to feel a great amount of please from penetration alone.

I have to admit I think it's a tad worse for girls because they're usually years older than boys who experience it, what a wonderful and painful memory, and again because of the near-full pleasure removal.

I've heard a many varied justification of this barbarism. One of my favourites is that it allows a woman higher standing in society. That's all fine and good but why can't they just wait until she's at a proper age to decide that herself? "What? Oh, so I need to scrape away a piece of myself to fit it? Sure, why not?"

Jenn 2:08PM May 21, 2010

I completely agree. Not one single person who intends on mutilating their daughter should be allowed into the United States.

In America women are human beings. In other countries they are not, but in this one they are.

mick of CA 11:36AM May 21, 2010

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

advertisement