Healthcare Reform Is Only a Partial Victory for Women

March 22, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (11)

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog 

"We pushed back on the undue influence of special interests," Mr. Obama said. "We didn't give in to mistrust or to cynicism or to fear. Instead, we proved that we are still a people capable of doing big things." 

Well, that's the president's characterization of his victory on healthcare reform, according to the New York Times. There are a couple of things I like about this bill. But the final verdict will come a year or more from now when insurance companies raise rates to cover all the newly insured. This, I predict, will not be a happy or historic day for middle-class Americans who are already paying for their own health insurance.

Nonetheless, healthcare reform is here, like it or not, and I do want to savor the victories. They are summed up well in this E-mail from the Women's Media Center: 

We cannot ignore the fact this bill was passed only after a pro choice President appeased a gang of anti-choice legislators by agreeing to sign an Executive Order restating the Hyde Amendment--a longstanding and shameful provision which bars low-income women from accessing reproductive health care.

Bart Stupak caved and ultimately failed. This is a victory for the health care of American women, but only a partial one. The executive order may or may not expand the Hyde Amendment's already devastating impact; only time will tell. What we do know is that the health care bill includes the Nelson amendment which imposes significant restrictions on access to reproductive health care. Until women's perspectives, positions, and priorities are fully incorporated into our nation's policies, ego-tripping representatives out for their fifteen minutes of fame will again and again attempt to use our reproductive rights to highjack legislation. 

The ego-tripping referred to herein is when some atavistic member of the House GOP actually shouted "baby-killer" at an anti-abortion stalwart, Michigan Democratic Rep. Bart Stupak, as Stupak described his compromise on the House floor. 

That truly is a low point in American history---perfectly symmetrical with President Obama's claimed high point. 

Tags:
women's health,
health insurance,
healthcare,
healthcare reform,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I agree in many ways that women have been losing their motherly affections for their body and the youth that grows there. It certainly doesn't help much when a lot of these mother's are being left by the father's to have to do it all themselves. I'm not saying abortion is okay. It is certainly not something I could ever possibly do to myself or any baby I might carry, but I understand why some women do. What I DON'T understand is how they don't take the situation seriously. I know people that have had multiple abortions. Why weren't they taking better precaution? I don't know. It makes me sick. But something all these religious fanatics and MEN, as well as women that just want to push their point of view need to remember is, WE DO HAVE A CHOICE. It is up to us to follow the path of right or wrong. You cannot make someone do what you want or you are simply a captor and they your prisoner. Being a good person is a choice. Being a bad person is a choice. Collectively our choices will add together. And no matter WHAT religion you tout on your sleeve I garauntee you it is not your job to judge any of your brothers or sisters.

Amber of OR 12:56PM March 25, 2010

It is becasue motherhood escapes them? The sick thing about liberal women is that they have not a nurturing bone in their bodies. Imagine a women who would choose to cut their child to pieces in the most sadistic and bloody way, rather than nurture it. This is why liberal women like Erbe repulse most Americans.

sara of KS 2:59PM March 24, 2010

95% of abortions are elective surgeries of convenience. Two people engage in irresponsible sex; conceive a child and then decided that the life they created interferes with their hedonistic life style or personal schedule - or perhaps the woman doesn't want wrinkles on her tummy. All perfectly good reasons to kill an unborn child - to a moral monster.

So are "we the people" going to pay for breast implants, orthodontics, tummy-tucks, nose jobs, ear and body piercing, botox injection, and other forms of elective surgery as well?

"Women's reproductive health." Oh please, at least spare me the p.c. euphemism for murder. That's right...murder. In most states if a pregnant woman is attacked and the baby killed, the baby's death is considered "murder" under the law. So we have come to he point that the "wanting" of us is what makes us human. Interesting to note that on the 5 year anniversary of Patti Shiavo's murder.

Doesn't bode well for the aging "me generation".

R.L. Schaefer of CA 9:20PM March 22, 2010

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

advertisement