Obama's Response to H1N1 Vaccine Crisis Could be Key to Healthcare Reform

October 29, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (19)

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Health centers and clinics across the country began turning away people this week who came in search of the H1N1 or swine flu vaccine. A report from Bloomberg states:

From New York, where October deliveries fell short by 400,000 doses, to Dallas and Phoenix, which have postponed mass vaccinations, to San Francisco, where one family clinic is fielding 400 calls a day, local officials are being pressured by parents for swine flu vaccine as the death toll for children in the United States reached 95.

The flu threatened to blossom into an epidemic, as the government reported 95 deaths from H1N1 and 351 schools closed down nationwide, shutting out 126,000 students in 19 states—to prevent spread of the flu.

How the Obama administration handles this public health emergency could be key to its healthcare reform proposal. In a major blunder, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius admitted that of the 80 million to 120 million doses it was promised this summer, just more than 23 million doses have been delivered.

But Sebelius also promised eventually there will be enough flu vaccine for all Americans who need it.

Some pundits—mostly conservative Republicans—are using the health emergency to question whether the Obama administration is up to handling what could become a major public health emergency. Opponents of the president's healthcare reform say the vaccine shortage is proof the government shouldn't be in the healthcare business. Here's what Dana Perino of Politico had to say:

Which brings me to a larger point—does anyone think this episode inspires confidence in Americans that the government should be taking over all aspects of our healthcare system instead of taking step-by-step measures to improve the one we currently have? Perhaps people aren't connecting the dots just yet, but the underlying tension is there and I do think this makes an argument against a public option. If moms and dads are upset about waiting for a flu vaccine distribution run by the federal government, do they want to depend on the government for their basic healthcare? Uh, no.

Like Perino, I am not a fan of a so-called public option. Sorry, Mr. President, but I cannot point to a single government-run program in the history of this great nation that hasn't added to our tax burden. And subsidizing healthcare costs will harm middle-class taxpayers more than anyone else, regardless of whether you promise us that won't happen. It stretches your credibility quite thin.

That said, however, I don't agree with Ms. Perino's linking of a shortage of flu vaccines to a near certainty that the Obama administration would bungle a government-run healthcare service.

Tags:
H1N1,
healthcare,
healthcare reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (19)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Brandon; A government,or a ''state''if you wish,that functions contrary to the will and wellfare of the people is in fact burdensome.

The police are indeed a burden when they abuse their power,frame the innocent,enforce immoral and or unconstitutional laws and engage in a host of other activities besides that which pertains to protecting and serving the people.

Teachers who are not fit to teach,or simply facilitate the conditioning of our youth via propaganda are a burden.

A justice system which functions primarly to benifit the wealthy is a burden.There is little that is ''just''about the American justice system,just ask the tens of thousands of non-violent so called drug offenders who are slaving away their lives in our private prisons ! A justice system which features private for profit prisons is anything but just ! A system in which the wealthy can easily pay the legalized get out of jail bribes,''bail''while the poor can not even afford decent legal representation is both a burden and a mockery of justice.For the record,I live in a county in which persons accused of ceartain infractions are forced to pay court costs even when choosing not to go to court ! I became aware of this in september of this year,''as I was forced to pay 130.00 dollars for the crime of fishing with worms in a section of river preserved for fly fishing'' ! I have since learnend that this is standard procedure in much of the country.As far as I know,no one,nor any organization is working to change this preversion of justice.

A millitary which is used in an unconstitutional manner,employes torture,assasinations and generaly functions to seve the interests of the corporate elite is a burden to the people forced to finance and submit to that military.

A tax system based upon force and used to finance institutions as well as activities contrary to the will of the people is a burden to the people.I wonder when will people wise up and realize that it is possible to have the benifits of public finance,without the scourge of forced taxation ? The fact that money does not ''grow on trees''means that a soverieghn nation can in fact supply it's self with as much money as it needs ! We should not allow the interests of the wealthy to force us to choose between a loss of freedom and the public wellfare !

Perhaps Branden, you should think before you write !

James G. of NC 4:46PM December 15, 2009

I apologise for the error in the third paragraph of my blog concerning healthcare reform and the depopulation agenda.That second sentence should read-

In effect we the people must reclaim our right to life and freedom by reclaiming the ''natural commons,''ownend by no one but accsessed by all and managed properly by a represenitive government,comprised of the people striving for the good of the people. Thanks.

James G. of NC 12:48PM December 15, 2009

The so called healthcare reform bill proposed by the government will actually make healthcare less accsessable to the people who need it the most,those people beeing the elderly,the disabled and in general, working class citezens who have union healthcare plans.The public needs to ask congress and the president why, ''if they are trying to make viable healthcare more afforable and or accessable to the American public''are they slashing medicare benifits and taxing the existing healthcare plans of individuals who have policies worth over 8000 dollars !? Such plans are being definend as ''Caddilac''plans and are being described as wastefull by congress ! In a time when even one day in a hospital will cost over five thousand dollars,it is absolute lunacy to define any insurance plan worth less than a million dollars as wastefull.

There is only one reason our corporate ownend and run government would be trying to make healthcare even less accsessable to the general public;that reason being the desire of the ownership class to significantly slash the human population down to whatever number is desirable,''or should I say usefull''to them. The depopulation agenda is a predictable outcome of a global socioeconomic paridghn based upon the private ownership of the natural resources which all humans,''and other lifeforms need to survive''.Incidentaly the idea that the planet is overpopulated is the result of propaganda on behalf of the elite who know full well that the real problem facing humanity is the fact that they,comprising less than twenty percent of the human population, claim as their private property eighty plus percent of the worlds wealth,including the bulk of real or natural wealth, such as agriable land,potable water,timber supplies et.

If you desire a just and humane world in which all people enjoy the right to live for the sake of life it's self,''currently the aveage human human being lives only to fill a position in the ''devision of labor'' scheme created by the ownership class''then the common people of the world must strive together to create a new economic paridighn based upon the mutual accsess of the planets natural resources.In effect we the people must proclaim our right to life and freedom by reclaiming the ''natural commons'',owned by no one but accsessed by all and managed properly by a represenitive government,comprised of the striving for the good of the people.If we do not do this, the end result will be a world which is claimed as the private property by an elite few,while the common inhabitants of that world,''if we still exist''will live as the human cattle of the elite.In reality that time has arrived,our only hope lies in the depth of our desire to live as free human beings as oppossed to a sub-spiecies of culled and managed human resources.

James G. of NC 12:34PM December 15, 2009

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

advertisement