Home > Opinion > Bonnie Erbe > Diane Sawyer Replaces Charles Gibson But Nightly News is Now a Pink Collar Ghetto

Diane Sawyer Replaces Charles Gibson But Nightly News is Now a Pink Collar Ghetto

Reader Comments
Back to blog

WHY HASN'T SHE BEEN DOING HER JOB LATELY. SHE IS ALWAYS ON VACATION OR OFF......?

SHEILA of OH 12:56PM September 06, 2009

Rachel is not quite as prejudiced as Keith Olberman but comes
close to catching up with him. She does not act as 'crazy' and
'out of control' as he did a couple of nights ago on his
program. After perhaps a couple of minutes on either of these
programs I have to switch to another network. MSNBC is going
downhill pretty fast.

Genniel Hayes of FL 10:40AM September 05, 2009

Rachel is not quite as prejudiced as Keith Olberman but comes
close to catching up with him. She does not act as 'crazy' and
'out of control' as he did a couple of nights ago on his
program. After perhaps a couple of minutes on either of these
programs I have to switch to another network. MSNBC is going
downhill pretty fast.

Genniel Hayes of FL 10:39AM September 05, 2009

Obama has a genius IQ...Maddow is highly educated
The left just throws sh1t out and hopes nobody calls them on it. Tell me about her education please. I guarantee there will not be a response to this.

Ken of IL 9:00PM September 03, 2009

The bigots come out of the woodwork whenever they can, don't they? Incidentally, if you think Rachel looks like a bull dyke [and I say that proudly], you've never met a real one. Good luck to ya!

Kay Shawn of OH 2:46PM September 03, 2009

Is a highly educated, very thoughtful and interesting woman and I am thrilled she is on TV. I am sorry she doesn't meet some of your standards for attractiveness and femininity, but that is not her job. She is not dating you.
I actually miss Elizabeth Vargas on the news, she was excellent.

Jen of IN 1:45PM September 03, 2009

Pink Ghetto? Interesting choice of words. I think I would have used the word Stilleto. But whose, quibbleing? So, in essence, networks have gone from white collar ghetto to pink collar ghetto. The truth is the "major" (which are now minor) networks are still ghettos.
Trust is the hardest thing to acquire and the quickest thing to squander. The Walter Cronkite's of the world are no longer a trusted source of news. They've become relegated to side show, two-bit circus performers.

David of ID 10:58AM September 03, 2009

Here is why:
-She goes out of her way to look like a man
-she is incapable of being a good mother
-she is loud and in your face
-her arguments and logic are sophomoric
-she hasn't an ounce of femininity to her
-she has a large homo following
-nobody gives a sh1t what she has to say, except liberals
combine these factors and you have the poster child for liberalism, just like I said

johnny of AR 9:06PM September 02, 2009

and ABC viewership will go down even further (if that is possible), with her at the helm.

david of MO 7:58PM September 02, 2009

Rachel is a blow hard who looks like a bull d^ke, plain and simple. Nobody takes this lesbian looking thing seriously and to compare her popularity with Bill O'reilly shows how stupid you people really are.

steve of NE 7:55PM September 02, 2009