Wikipedia’s New Rules Don’t Go Far Enough

August 25, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (8)

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Go Wikipedia, go! But go even farther than today's news suggests. Finally, the wild West-like, Web-based encyclopedia is reining in some Internet cowboys. I take it as a pyrrhic victory, but a victory nonetheless. It means at the very least that I'm hardly alone in having dealt with Web-lurkers who take aspects of one's bio that are not major markers of one's accomplishments and turn them into signature events in that person's life.

From the New York Times:

Officials at the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit in San Francisco that governs Wikipedia, say that within weeks, the English-language Wikipedia will begin imposing a layer of editorial review on articles about living people.

The new feature, called "flagged revisions," will require that an experienced volunteer editor for Wikipedia sign off on any change made by the public before it can go live. Until the change is approved — or in Wikispeak, flagged — it will sit invisibly on Wikipedia's servers, and visitors will be directed to the earlier version.

Having been through this with a Wikipedia editor, changes made by others are no joyride. The editor with whom I dealt, whose real name I do not know, was highly professional. But the rules that still govern Wiki biographical information make it difficult for anyone to control what the 10th most-popular Web site disseminates regarding one's bio.

Essentially, if there's a link to a Web post anywhere, even one you posted yourself, until these changes were put into effect, any "lurker" could link your bio page to that post, distort its meaning, and take control of your mini Web bio. Thank you, Wikipedia, for realizing the need to change the current set-up. Now, please consider changing the rules a bit further, so living persons have complete control over what is posted on their bio pages.

 

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Задумались о презентах на ДР сыну, ему 4 года, различные-пылесборники-конструкторы у него есть предостаточно, он любитмышку Тич. Я выискала типа такой игрушки, только медведя -медвежонок Куби, кто покупал такого? Стоит покупать? Или порекомендуйте что-нибудь еще. Не дайте ребенку остаться без подарочка от родителей.

EugeneYY of AL 2:21AM March 10, 2010

If the person has complete control of their bio it is going to be incredibly biased. That is the most ridiculous demand I've ever heard anyone make of wikipedia. If that happened all the information would be utterly worthless.

It is great that there is some editorial control, but you are asking too much.

Jon of NH 11:35AM August 30, 2009

you probably use wikipedia for your post references.

you really care what your bio on wikipedia says when anyone can make an entire website based on you and put whatever they want?

Just because someone says something about you that you don't like doesn't make it false.

MIT of GA 7:10PM August 26, 2009

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

advertisement