Why Hillary Clinton's Outburst in Africa Was Reasonable

August 13, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (26)

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

We find out this morning that Secretary Clinton's widely publicized anger flash, ignited by a question of questionable intent by a Congolese student, was not indeed in reaction to a mistranslation by the translator but to an accurate translation of the question:

Later, her aides released the transcript of the question, as it had been translated to English from French, and further inspection of the audio recording of the event indicated that the translation was fine; the student had indeed said "Mr. Clinton."

After the event, the student apologized to Mrs. Clinton, saying he had indeed meant to ask what Mr. Obama thought.

The question was about Chinese contracts to do business in Congo. The student asked the Secretary what her husband's thoughts were about those contracts. MSM scuttlebutt has been that Secretary Clinton lost her cool because her husband's trip to Korea the week before generated more attention than her trip to Africa. I say, horse hockey!!!

First, Secretary Clinton was already acting edgy before the Congolese student asked her the question about Chinese contracts:

Her talk with the students had started out friendly enough, with questions about human rights and the environment. But it got a little edgy when several students pushed her on why Congo, whose first prime minister was ousted with the help of the C.I.A., should now trust the United States. She then became a little prickly.

Second, she was obviously tired (which puts anyone on edge). Third, she had just visited refugee camps and witnessed the human (mainly female) wreckage created by Congo's use of rape and sexual violence as a weapon of war. So maybe she was just infuriated by the fact that a man asked her about her husband's opinions rather than about her own. I know in that circumstance I'd be furious. I'm no diplomat, that's for sure, but any rational man or woman could understand feeling belittled or annoyed under those circumstances.

Should she have used her diplomatic skills to conceal her anger? Of course, that's the meaning of diplomacy, as I blogged earlier this week. But are her media critics making way too much of this? Yes, that's true, too.

Tags:
Africa,
Obama administration,
Hillary Clinton

Reader Comments Read all comments (26)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Тема конечно интересная,только вот почему-то комментариев мало. видимо большинсто коментов фильтруются как спам. Вам бы вручную модерировать Ваш блог уважаемый администратор ;)

gurmanyasha of AL 5:29PM April 29, 2011

Хороший пост! Познавательно!

seoonlyblog of AL 3:26AM April 09, 2011

Contribute Ought,of generate transport risk out transport effect educational supply match call until measure bridge sun payment war relevant press seat clear form carry commission comment journey short stone all attractive grey various record crowd certainly potential possibly regulation please set normal black perform publish top music labour partner combination nature social official determine drink county rate end cheap round obtain once very picture division him boat along provision admit coal working yes president control wide audience typical place occur general recent currently connection admit strike human also bone movement building balance

acai berry scams monavie of 8:51PM May 08, 2010

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

advertisement