Antiabortion Fanatics' New Invasive Attack: the Forced Ultrasound

February 12, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

You have to give members of the religious right credit for one thing: No matter how resoundingly voters whack them into oblivion, they come right back fighting. To clarify, I'm not talking about average, conservative, pro-life voters. I'm talking about fanatics and activists.

Exhibit A:

"LINCOLN, Neb. (AP)—Abortion foes have a new tactic: The hope that women can't look away.

Lawmakers in 11 states are considering bills that would offer or require ultrasounds before a woman gets an abortion. The most stringent are proposed laws in Nebraska, Indiana and Texas, which would require a doctor show the ultrasound image of the fetus to the woman, despite legal challenges to a similar measure in Oklahoma.

A similar bill was proposed in Wyoming but it was defeated in a state House committee before reaching the floor."

No woman seeking an abortion does so unthinkingly. Few, if any, women use abortion as birth control, although the religious right would have us believe otherwise. And women seeking abortions do not need moralistic lectures about the horrors they are about to commit. To require them to have an ultrasound prior to an abortion is the most invasive type of moralistic lecture imaginable. Some state laws would even require poor women to pay for them, which would put the cost of abortion beyond their meager reach.

The überright has already succeeded in throwing so many obstacles in the path of women trying to end unwanted pregnancies: 24-hour waiting periods, parental consent laws, and so on. Required ultrasounds are a step too far. "Offered" ultrasounds are insulting, too. In my humble opinion, both are completely unconstitutional.

Read my lips: Elections have consequences. You lost. Go away.

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.

Tags:
abortion

Reader Comments Read all comments (59)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

A critically important topic, yet another understated headline. "Abortion Fanatics"? Try, "Elected Republican Officials"... The people moving this forward are elected officials. Calling them "fanatics" trivializes what is happening in our government right now and further obscures what the Tea Party movement was really all about.

TexRex96 of CA 1:12AM February 16, 2012

If we are "antiabortion fanatics" because we strongly desire the safety of the unborn, what does that make the other side? Blood thirsty baby killers?

Seriously, do you cheer that more babies can be killed?

John of FL 7:18AM April 30, 2010

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside...."

"Born or naturalized ..." No rights are guaranteed to the unborn by the constitution. If we choose to make abortion a crime after a certain time during the pregnancy, that's our perogative. But there are no constitutional rights.

Victor Purinton of MA 1:49PM February 27, 2009

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Concordia Ship Disaster

The Costa Concordia luxury cruise ship keeled over after it ran aground off the coast of Italy.

advertisement