Obama, the GOP, and the Myth of Post-Partisanship

January 30, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog.

Well, President Obama is barely into his second week in office and his flimflam promise of post-partisanship has shown itself to be the campaign lie it always seemed to many of us to be. The veiled myth of post-partisanship was revealed as the curtain was pulled back on the House vote on the stimulus package yesterday: The bill passed with no Republican support. That, even after Mr. Obama tossed women's health aside and caved into Republican demands to cut out hundreds of millions of dollars to provide birth control to low-income women.

If Mr. Obama's definition of post-partisanship is a more cordial, less harsh atmosphere in which to discuss partisan disagreements, then certainly he's done better on that front than President Bush. That's not only because he's reached out to Republicans, it's also because he's governing, or attempting to govern, or wants to be seen as governing, from the center. Bush governed from the extreme right with a "Democrats begone" attitude.

A blogger at TalkingPointsMemo spins out the possibility that post-partisanship does not equate to bipartisanship. Call me crazy, but that's what I envisioned it to be—the ability of one magnanimous leader to bring together two sets of pugilistic brats:

After all, there are some Republicans who are not neo-cons and may be up for trying some new approaches in foreign policy, even some Republicans who may get on board with healthcare reform if they can be convinced it's not socialism. But if there's one thing every single elected Republican agrees on—indeed, the only principle the Republican party has left—it's that government is bad, tax cuts are good. So essentially, right out of the box, Obama is asking them to compromise on a bill that, at its core, goes against their one bedrock principle.

In order for partisanship to exit the political system, all voters would have to toe the same party line and set the same agenda. That won't happen. Even in the midst of a recession that threatens to extend into Depression territory.

Tags:
Barack Obama,
politics,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Obama offered no compromise, nothing to allow these "Red State" Republicans to be able to get on board and tell the people back home that the good stuff that would help the economy outweighed the bad stuff that was fluff because it was mostly all 'fluff" and is a bad bill. If this is Obama's idea of 'bipartisanship', then he has no one else to blame in 2 years when people are still unhappy with the way things are done in Washington.

Joe Walsh of WV 8:46AM January 31, 2009

Printing money and creating "make-work" jobs was a good idea - then why not skip worrying about the economy and just keep printing money forever? This sort of "air-head economics" is what got us into this mess - don't think it's gonna fix it.

By the way Bonnie, this is "package" supposed to save our economy not provide low income women condoms.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 10:16PM January 30, 2009

Republicans should treat Obama the way Democrats treated Bush?

David of FL 8:50PM January 30, 2009

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Concordia Ship Disaster

The Costa Concordia luxury cruise ship keeled over after it ran aground off the coast of Italy.

advertisement