Sarah Palin and Free-Market Feminism

January 28, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog.

Very interesting post on alternet.org about whether Sarah Palin gives right-wingers a chance to launch something called free-market feminism and brand her as a lure to younger, slightly more progressive Republican or conservative women. The article explains how she appeals to Bible conservatives with her lifestyle (heterosexual marriage, lots of kids and a great career) but also to free-marketers with her beliefs.

There's only one problem. Yes, she told CBS' Katie Couric she was a feminist (in that now-infamous interview that was the beginning of the end of her candidacy) but in a later encounter with reporters she took back the mantle and said that she was not a feminist.

Here's some of the post for your enjoyment nonetheless:

Palin is by no means a feminist in the traditional sense. While acknowledging that she benefited from Title IX, which bans sex discrimination in educational institutions, she has expressed off-again, on-again support for talking about condoms during sex education, and is associated with the group Feminists for Life, the home of such "conservative feminists" as the wife of Supreme Court Justice John Roberts.

But Palin gave viable political form to a "free-market feminism" that until now was largely championed by a few intellectuals and pundits based in conservative Beltway think tanks. As the GOP regroups in the Obama era, it may find this kind of feminism useful as a means of softening the culture war crusade that is so off-putting to moderate Republicans and independents alike.

Tags:
feminism,
Sarah Palin

Reader Comments Read all comments (20)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Does anyone realize she denied women rape kits? That does not say feminist to me...

Hey of VA 12:10PM January 07, 2010

Feminism does need to be reborn.. you're right - random Tiffany from Texas. What it doesn't need is to be modeled after a ,glistening, shiny, modern version of Victorian age acquiescence- to the master gender -in this case male. Women and men should be able to coincide in the same environment without trying to dominate or control one another. The "Individuality" phase of the eighties and nineties would be all for not if feminism were to be morphed into defined "gender" roles. Let us face it audience... Gender is taught , it is and shall always be a "cultural" thing, so what you teach your children will be handed down from person to person. Let us rise above cliched "notions" of "soft core" feminism and stick to the cold hard facts.... Sarah Palin would endorse a water down version of feminism that would suck the soul of every woman and girl on this planet. Slavery was abolished in 1863, so why try to revive and collar it around our women subtly with the facade named "Free-market-Feminism"?

Also for the record ...If George Washington believed the common man should run our government, then why were only white property owning males over the age of 25 allowed to vote up 1960's?

Hi of VA 12:08PM January 07, 2010

+1

soundtracks of AL 6:12AM July 17, 2009

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

No White Knight to Save Republicans

The GOP is stuck with Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, or Paul.

Concordia Ship Disaster

The Costa Concordia luxury cruise ship keeled over after it ran aground off the coast of Italy.

advertisement