Monday, March 22, 2010

Opinion

Sarah Palin and Free-Market Feminism

January 28, 2009 10:16 AM ET | Bonnie Erbe | Permanent Link | Print

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog.

Very interesting post on alternet.org about whether Sarah Palin gives right-wingers a chance to launch something called free-market feminism and brand her as a lure to younger, slightly more progressive Republican or conservative women. The article explains how she appeals to Bible conservatives with her lifestyle (heterosexual marriage, lots of kids and a great career) but also to free-marketers with her beliefs.

There's only one problem. Yes, she told CBS' Katie Couric she was a feminist (in that now-infamous interview that was the beginning of the end of her candidacy) but in a later encounter with reporters she took back the mantle and said that she was not a feminist.

Here's some of the post for your enjoyment nonetheless:

Palin is by no means a feminist in the traditional sense. While acknowledging that she benefited from Title IX, which bans sex discrimination in educational institutions, she has expressed off-again, on-again support for talking about condoms during sex education, and is associated with the group Feminists for Life, the home of such "conservative feminists" as the wife of Supreme Court Justice John Roberts.

But Palin gave viable political form to a "free-market feminism" that until now was largely championed by a few intellectuals and pundits based in conservative Beltway think tanks. As the GOP regroups in the Obama era, it may find this kind of feminism useful as a means of softening the culture war crusade that is so off-putting to moderate Republicans and independents alike.

Tags: feminism | Sarah Palin

Tools: Share | | Comments (22) | Print

Reader Comments

OMG

Does anyone realize she denied women rape kits? That does not say feminist to me...

sarah is no feminist

Feminism does need to be reborn.. you're right - random Tiffany from Texas. What it doesn't need is to be modeled after a ,glistening, shiny, modern version of Victorian age acquiescence- to the master gender -in this case male. Women and men should be able to coincide in the same environment without trying to dominate or control one another. The "Individuality" phase of the eighties and nineties would be all for not if feminism were to be morphed into defined "gender" roles. Let us face it audience... Gender is taught , it is and shall always be a "cultural" thing, so what you teach your children will be handed down from person to person. Let us rise above cliched "notions" of "soft core" feminism and stick to the cold hard facts.... Sarah Palin would endorse a water down version of feminism that would suck the soul of every woman and girl on this planet. Slavery was abolished in 1863, so why try to revive and collar it around our women subtly with the facade named "Free-market-Feminism"?

Also for the record ...If George Washington believed the common man should run our government, then why were only white property owning males over the age of 25 allowed to vote up 1960's?

soundtracks

+1

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Free Trial!

Get the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine free for four weeks!

About Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

FAVORITES

advertisement

Thomas Jefferson St.

Obama, Democrats Score on Health Reform

A lot of critics owe the president a lot of apologies.

GOP Bluffing on Healthcare Hyde Amendment?

Are they serious about opposing the Hyde Amendment?

Senate GOPers' Healthcare Conundrum

Will they really oppose reconciliation?

Drama Queen Democrats

After a year of debating reform, how can anyone still be undecided on healthcare?

Immigration Reform Bill May Be Too Lax

Has any other country been so forgiving with lawbreakers?

Health Reform Hurts Small Business

Democrats would be smart to consider the repercussions on 55 percent of U.S. jobs.

GOP Scared of Health Reform’s Success

While painting reform as a threat to the American people, Republicans fear it will work.

A Partisan Coup by A Mob of Elites

Democrats’ attitude an affront to the American people.

Public Opinion

A Passing Vote on Health Reform?

Resolution expected Sunday evening.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.