On Obama, the Global Gag Rule, and the Myth of Post-Partisanship

January 23, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (28)

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Let's be clear. There's no such thing as post-partisanship. President Obama's annoying tendency to try to please everyone could one day cause him to lose everybody. The most recent group he threw over the side was women—who gave him his job. Unlike his two predecessors, Obama did not take action on the so-called global gag rule on the anniversary of Roe v. Wade. But major media sources say he will act to end it, possibly as soon as today.

The delay is due to Obama's ridiculous attempt to curry favor with the religious right. He can't do it and maintain the support of progressive women and men, gays and lesbians, non-Christians, or, in other words, the bulk of his constituency.

Say some on the religious right:

That's a respectful move, said the Rev. Joel Hunter, pastor of Northland Church, outside Orlando, Fla., an abortion opponent who has tried to expand the evangelical agenda.

"I really do appreciate their sensitivity to this day and this issue," he said. "To do it [the policy change] on a day that pro-life people see as a day of grief, and a day of a really hurtful decision, would be, I think, very insensitive. And that's not who I think President Obama is or would mean to be."

Washington was awash yesterday in these folks, who, by the way, left behind a mountain of street trash. Uber-Christians close the religious schools and bring all the students, willingly or not, to the rally to billow the ranks.

President Obama cannot find common ground with these radicals, and he's kidding himself if he thinks he can. Some of the most radical elements of these groups murder ob-gyn doctors. They are the ones who throw themselves on the pavement to stop women who are trying to gain access to women's health clinics. They are fanatics, plain and simple, and there's no pleasing them in the long run. I say he's wasting his time and precious political capital trying.

Tags:
abortion,
Barack Obama,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (28)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Great work, webmaster, nice design!

bella soma of KY 7:51AM July 04, 2009

I don't see why everyone is so against killing babies, we have been doing it forever and if Bush and Hillary and all can send our troops to war, why can't we rid ourselves of these pesky creatures? Obama needs to protect our rights to open up hunting season on the varmint that litter our lives because a few accidents we make in the heat of passion or during an act of violence. If Obama wants us to pay the repercussions, I say impeach him and get someone with a backbone and who is liberal enough so we can kill these fetuses. While he's at it, we have paved the way for gay rights now... How long will we suffer for our desire for beastiality and a wanton to lower the age level for sex. I hate these friggin right-winged moral lovers. THEY RUIN EVERYTHING!

David of NM 5:27PM January 30, 2009

I am a Republican and voted for McCain/Palin.

I am very concerned over Obama's reaction to Rush Limbaugh's comments. Someone should inform the President that me, Rush, Obama, and everyone who reads this are allowed to do what Rush did because he is an American. Has Obama forgotten about "Freedom of Speech"? Does he plan to take that away from us also?

C. Johnson of MS 5:01PM January 28, 2009

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

advertisement