Is Health Insurance Biased Against Women? Maybe Not

December 31, 2008 RSS Feed Print

By Bonnie Erbe, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Is health insurance biased against women because in many states women pay higher rates when they are younger?

The city of San Francisco is challenging state legislation that allows insurance companies to charge women more than men for health coverage.

In a practice known as gender rating, women in California pay up to 39 percent more than men for coverage in the individual insurance market, which is where people who aren't covered by employer plans or state health programs get their insurance. Nationwide, about 7 percent of women buy their health coverage directly from insurance companies.

At first blush, the answer to my question above is "Of course!" But continue reading the article and you'll find that bias, and cost, are reversed as people age.

Insurance companies have argued that their premiums reflect the actual costs of healthcare. Because women file more insurance claims than men, it makes sense that they should pay more for their coverage, said Robert Zirkelbach, spokesman for the trade group America's Health Insurance Plans. He noted that as people get older, the gender rating process reverses, with men paying more for their insurance than women.

So if older men have to pay more than older women, is that bias? Or is it simply a market factor that has nothing to do with bias? If elimination of all "differences" between the genders is what passes for bias these days, then the answer to the first question is "Yes." But the point of striving to end bias is not to eliminate all differences between men and women (which is impossible) but to eliminate unfair stereotypes. As long as there are price differences in health insurance (it's always more expensive for older Americans, for example), then charging younger women and older men higher rates does not on its face strike me as bias.

Tags:
sexism,
health insurance

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

What about how many of those same companies in the individual insurance market will not cover many crucial things related to women's health (ie. birth control, abortion, and all visits related to pregnancy and delivery), yet are willing to offer coverage to men for things like drugs for erectile dysfunction? That seems sexist to me.

And, while some might argue that these companies are just be smart by not offering coverage of some very expensive charges related to women's health and expanding what they will cover by adding a few less expensive items of coverage to their plans, being financially driven does not make a company ethical.

Kristen of IL 12:31PM December 31, 2008

Bonnie, you couldn't find any covert sexism in the closets of insurance companies? It would have been strange if you had - After all, these corporations exist to make a profit, and would never allow any "ism" to get in the way of that.

Sorry this wasn't very productive ground for your compulsion of "sexism hunting" - Better luck tomorrow...

R.L. Schaefer of CA 12:08PM December 31, 2008

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Concordia Ship Disaster

The Costa Concordia luxury cruise ship keeled over after it ran aground off the coast of Italy.

advertisement