We're Child-Free, Not Childless

August 20, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (45)

More American women are choosing not to have children, according to a new report from the Census Bureau.

But the Census Bureau and the mainstream media continue to refer to women without children as "childless" instead of "child-free." Child-free implies women made an affirmative decision not to have children. Childless implies women are infertile and could not have children. As one who made that affirmative decision (I had no children on purpose), I am hereby launching my own personal media campaign to make "child-free" the term of choice, not "childless."

I'm glad many women want to have children. It's a biological imperative, or the species might perish. But the more educated we get, and the more choices we have, more of us are likely to decide that we want to devote ourselves to other tasks (like writing a blog) than raising a child. I understand it's the minority choice. I just want it to be as respected as the majority choice.

Now back to the facts: The report shows an overall decline in U.S. fertility. But don't worry about depletion of the species, because while U.S. fertility is dropping, the U.S. population is ballooning upward, mainly because of increased immigration and the large families immigrant women tend to have.

Census data reveal 20 percent of American women between the ages of 40 and 44 have no children, twice the number of 30 years ago. Women in that age range who do have children have just fewer than two (1.9) on average, down from just more than three (3.1) in 1976.

Women's decisions to pursue higher education and lofty careers before having children may also be driving other changes in fertility. While women with advanced or professional degrees are more likely to be child-free, they also have the current highest birthrate (67 births for every 1,000 women) of all educational levels. But current fertility refers to the rate at which women had children in the year before the survey was taken. Women with advanced degrees also have the lowest lifetime fertility rate. One Census Bureau official told me that means highly educated women that year were more likely to get out of school and have a baby right away. They still have the lowest lifetime fertility rate of any group of women.

Tags:
Census Bureau,
children

Reader Comments Read all comments (45)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"Well, childless does mean without children. The way you are stating it, you're making it sound as though children are a burden and people wish to be free of them. Childless is the correct way to say you have no children."

Well Chris of AZ the fact of the matter is that the English language isn't a dead language like Latin and continues to evolve. Irrespective, though, by what authority do you decide which definition is proper? Do you have a position with a group of individuals who have been deemed by the collective authority of all English speaking nations to make such determination which has made the term "child free" an invalid statement?

The above is a rhetorical statement and, of course, just helps to illustrate the fact that you have made an almost mystical determination of which definition of a term is valid based on your extremely narrow idea, or very subjective determination of what is valuable to you. Unfortunate that the dull minded among us have the greatest propensity to spread their sub-par DNA into the future. No reason to think such minds could stand to contribute any ground breaking new concepts to advance the future of civilization or the species.

"Wow. It almost sounds as though you have a contempt for humanity. Also, you better hope we start accepting more immigrants and they in turn have more children. Favorite programs that you support, such as Medicare and Social Security, depend upon having more people paying in than people taking out."

A ridiculous statement, and is an insult to the intelligence of the author and the rest of us. The minuscule energy of the chemical reaction that resulted in the low level firing of electrical charges between your feeble synapses was clearly wasted and would have been better used by primitive bactria in pigeon droppings which results in the breakdown of fecal matter into organic components used in the photo synthesis of plant life to fuel the existence of entities whose mental processes don't pollute the cyberspace with clearly anti-value memes of purely mind collapsing stupidity.

First of all, no doubt you have no idea of how the law of supply and demand effects the price of any commodity. Please read some history about how the Black Plague in the early 15Th century effected the cost of peasant labor. It doesn't take a genius to see that labor is a commodity in the science of economics, and that a relative shortage effects the price at a multiple of the percentage change. But never mind, I know it is difficult to educate the arrogantly stupid. My agenda is just to, in my own small way, discourage individuals possessing pitch black dull mentalities from having the misguided confidence to automatically type out such poorly thought out "concepts" with impunity.

chris of OR 7:10PM July 23, 2011

Brooke handcuffs for gobies beyond removal in her decay convection and represents peyton move a film century.

music recording computer programs of AL 11:19PM May 19, 2010

In 2000 the census figures also showed 1 in 5 women 40-44 did not have children. The census does not track the choice factor but the census researchers I talked to when researching my book, Families of Two, theorized that the stat generally reflected the choice factor because medical technology is so good these days. We shall see what the 2010 census brings. Whether the choice is voluntary or not should really be separated out in the stats because the two are very different.

I would like to come up with new language around how we describe oursleves as childless by choice or childfree. Agreed--child"less" implies we are less than, or at least something in our lives is lacking, which reinforces long-held pronatalistic values. Child"free"--while relating the freedom that comes from opting out of parenthood, has also been associated with the stereotype that if you don't want kids, you must not be a responsible adult "yet" -- the puer or puella type refusing to grow up. This too puts the choice in a negative light. Either way, the words focus on "child" first--which to me means in using it we continue to reinforce a child-focus. We are not about having kids so why do we use this word in describing ourselves? We need new language for this that does not ultimately keep up on the defensive, having to justify our choice. What would be language instead that reflects that this choice is just as legitimate as the choice to have kids?

Laura Carroll of CA 7:47PM January 26, 2010

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

advertisement