Celebration Not So Celebratory for Tennessee Walking Horses

August 19, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (120)

It's that time of the year again when Shelbyville, Tenn., hosts its annual Tennessee Walking Horse National Celebration. Let's hope 2008 marks the year when the horses are allowed to celebrate along with the humans by being treated and trained in a humane manner. But that's a slim bet.

Just recently the American Association of Equine Practitioners issued recommendations for eliminating the practice known as "soring." Soring is used all too often on high-level Tennessee walking horses. Soring's purpose (the application of acid and other painful substances to burn the horses' skin) is to get the horses to lift their front legs painfully high and adopt a painful and unnatural posture. Some, not all, Tennessee walking horse owners find it appealing to watch the horses parade around an arena in this fashion.

First a bit about the celebration: It is the mother of all Tennessee walking horse shows, where some 4,000 entries compete in what the organization's website describes as "the premier event for the Tennessee walking horse, during which the breed's world grand champion and some 20 world champions are named. It is a festival event, encompassing exciting classes in competition where more than $650,000 in prizes and awards are given."

But here's how the New York Times described the "celebration" that took place in 2006:

[A] long-simmering dispute between federal regulators and the horses' trainers and owners climaxed late Saturday with the cancellation of the celebration's final showing to crown the world grand champion, for the first time in the event's 68-year history.

The decision by the organizers came after inspectors who check for signs of abuse disqualified most of the horses, leaving just three eligible for the championship, the organizers said. The organizers said the cancellation was due to safety concerns after a crowd of 150 people demanded that all of the horses be allowed to show in the final event.

After the catastrophic shutdown of the 2006 event, organizers adopted a series of animal protection regulations to which entrants must adhere. This year's celebration could mark a turning point where those regulations are actually enforced. In 2007, according to the Humane Society's Keith Dane, they were not.

In an E-mailed release, Dane wrote: "Even though soring is prohibited by the federal Horse Protection Act of 1970, some within the industry still abuse horses. Its continued practice is documented by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's issuance of 103 competitor violations during the 2007 Tennessee Walking Horse Celebration, the industry's championship event."

The celebration lists on its website a veritable tome of regulations it promises to enforce. They are:

  • Continue an equine drug-screening program that will now include eye examination
  • Use hoof testers on flat-shod entries
  • Remove, inspect, and weigh shoes on random flat-shod entries after championship classes
  • Prohibit use of syringes, except by licensed veterinarians
  • Prohibit veterinarians from giving third-party opinions in the inspection area
  • Drop girths for inspection
  • Select judges with no HPA violations in 2008
  • Sanction with an HIO that has signed the 2007-09 Operating Plan
  • Judges to submit to polygraph test after the show
  • DQP's to submit to polygraph test after the show
  • Show management to submit to polygraph test after the show
  • Maintain a secure inspection area
  • Allow only eligible horses in the inspection area
  • DQP's and VMO's may perform random inspections in the barn area
  • Enforce the Tennessee Anti-Soring ordinance

More in my next post on why those regulations need to be in place and whether the celebration is enforcing them as promised.

Tags:
horses,
Tennessee,
animals

Reader Comments Read all comments (120)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Wow we have both ends of the spectrum here. I think Melissa's viewpoint is pretty much shared by any horse owner who actually cares about the animal and doesn't want to see it tortured for the sake competition or money. Regardless of the breed or the type of competition, when there is enough notoriety or money involved, there are always going to be those who use inhumane and painful abusive methods of training to get a horse to do what they want. But, without a doubt, the Tennessee Walking Horse industry does have the worst reputation of any breed out there for abusing their horses. Of course not all trainers abuse them... but many of the big show trainers do and it is far too widely "accepted" and overlooked in the show circuit. Some of it is horrible.

I personally don't understand why people feel the need to put ANY extra weight or devises or chemicals on a horse's foot. The Walkers move with a natural smoothness and action that is quite infamous and beautiful to watch. Somehow over the years, it's gotten out of hand. Anyone with a brain I would think could understand how putting an abnormally huge padded buildup on a hoof would cause SERIOUS issues with leg bone and hoof structure, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that the addition of chains and chemicals is only meant for one purpose... to annoy and irritate the horse enough to throw his feet around like crazy.

It's all really quite weird.

Anyone who loves and appreciates horses would not want them senselessly hurt or antagonized. And most everyone quite understands that certainly not ALL Walking Horses owners treat their animals this way. I have owned Walkers for pleasure riding. I've never put unnatural shoes or chemicals or devices on them.. and I've known many others who are like me... but being from Tennessee and surrounded by highly competitive Walking Horse stables all my life, I have seen many many many who do.

Anne of TN 10:06AM August 22, 2011

I rescued a 13 yr old walking horse, Ringo he had shown his entire life from the age of two until one month before I got him he was sored and in pads the entire time. His feet were horribly deformed, he had calcium deposits from where the chains beat against his bones. it took my farrier and I to get his feet almost normal alot of supplements and meds for the calcium deposits because they were painful to him he was lame un ridable because of the pain I got him in 2005 and by 2008 had to euthanize him because his pain level was awful and it required daily bute just so he could stand some what with out so much pain I do know his last few years were good ones he was loved and was able to be a horse. Those who do this need to be locked up and I hope karma comes for them. This subject is very near and dear to my heart because I want to stop other horses from living Ringo's horrible life before me.

Melissa Schalk of KY 2:47PM August 21, 2011

Hey there would you mind sharing which blog platform you're using? I'm going to start my own blog soon but I'm having a tough time deciding between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your layout seems different then most blogs and I'm looking for something completely unique. P.S Sorry for being off-topic but I had to ask!

fish oil benefits of AL 4:52PM August 04, 2011

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

advertisement