McCain and Obama Fit Into Neat Ideological Boxes—Extremist—but I Don't

June 27, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (11)

This blog entry is written mainly in response to comments posted by readers during the past week and a half who have hung the monikers "Republican" and "feminist" on me. The comments strike me as odd because for the most part they are polar opposites (yes, there are a few Republican feminists around, but they're no longer a force in the GOP), and neither one is apropos.

Eight years ago, Ralph Nader appointed himself Green Party candidate for president, cobbling together the mantra that candidates Bush and Gore were so similar he needed to enter the race to give voters a real choice.

In retrospect, the claim is laughable, as Al Gore clearly would have made a much better and different president than George W. Bush. Their records would have been about as similar as greenhouse gas is to fresh air.

In 2008, however, the opposite problem presents itself. Primary voters nominated an extreme conservative and an extreme liberal. Independent mainstreamers such as myself (I'll select my own monikers, thank you) have been handed Sophie's Choice or, more accurately, no choice at all. This explains, too, all the flip-flopping McCain and Obama have been doing of late; now that we're into the general election phase, they have to paint themselves as mainstreamers. Neither man is. If it were politically feasible, I'm betting millions of Americans would want to redo the primaries with a whole new, more attractive slate of candidates vying for the two parties' nominations.

Back to the reason for writing this blog entry. I'm not a Republican. I toe no party line, and partisanship seems foreign to me. No political party is going to tell me which issues to support. Most people I have met who are dedicated partisans are trying for a job on Capitol Hill or in a presidential administration and thus have a personal, financial, and vested interested in promoting or adhering to the party line.

I'm also not a feminist. I appreciate all the doors opened by my feminist foremothers and give them full credit for the landmark work they've done to win women societal and cultural freedoms. But, again, I do not agree with the entire feminist platform, and labels make me nervous.

I thank everyone for reading this blog but warn that labels of any kind will prove inaccurate.

Tags:
2008 presidential election

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

; )

Nolan Portillo of CA 5:28AM July 04, 2008

; )

Nolan Portillo of CA 5:19AM July 04, 2008

Hello there, Bonnie. I understand exactly what you're saying. Just because you have your own views doesn't mean you have to accept a label of any kind. It's the same thing with political parties. I vote for who is the best candidate, regardless of party.

I have actually been accused from things I have posted of being a conservative republican idiot, when I actually support Ralph Nader. But see, there some things, not many that I don't necessarily agree on.

Because I do not identity myself as a staunch heavily-left deomcrat.

Nor should I have to.

I have my views that are my own, and they transcend party lines.

It isn't an all or nothing deal. You have to be true to yourself and your principles.

So you don't want to be labeled a feminist because your full values and beliefs don't lie fully with them. To take on a label is a big responsibility, because you have to walk the walk, with fire, too. But if that isn't in your heart and that's not how you want to be indentified, then hell, BE YOURSELF.

Which is exactly what you're doing right now.

It's funny, many women blame men for belittling them, but a great deal of them act hypocritically. Women seem to be immediately vicious to other women. They think you should blindly be this way simply because you're a woman.

F-that.

You are who you are and if they don't like it, let 'em live in their hypocrisy.

You know yourself better than anyone.

And you are actually showing yourself to be an example of how women can be fair and open-minded about things.

I urge you to visit Ralph Nader's website at www.votenader.org

He deserves a closer look by those who want a firm, clear vision of tomorrow. If he were to get on one debate, just one, his numbers would jump tremendously...

But come election time, if in your heart you feel Obama is the best choice for president, then damn it that's your right.

No one should tell you how to vote. Nor make yo carry inaccurate labels as a result of such.

(Good article by the way. As far and balanced as I've seen in a while.)

Nolan Portillo of CA 5:12AM July 04, 2008

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

advertisement