McCain-Obama Race Leaves No Candidate for Mainstream Voters or the Socially-Conscious Entrepreneurial Class

May 9, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (14)

A Barack Obama presidency would cost America's entrepreneurial class dearly. Obama has pledged to lift the current cap on Social Security taxes if he becomes president. He'd get support in that venture from a Democratic-controlled Congress. According to the Social Security Administration's website, this means an additional 15.3 percent tax for self-employed people making more than $102,000 annually.

"The Social Security tax rate for 2008 is 15.3 percent on self-employment income up to $102,000," the site notes. "If your net earnings exceed $102,000, you continue to pay only the Medicare portion of the Social Security tax, which is 2.9 percent, on the rest of your earnings."

Latte liberals now supporting Obama who are self-employed (consultants, lawyers, doctors, self-employed entrepreneurs) who earn, for example, $200,000 per year, will pay more than $15,000 in additional federal taxes if Obama is elected and succeeds in lifting the cap. That's quite a disincentive to work hard and earn above $100,000 annually. That's also a disincentive for self-employed small-business owners, who produced the lion's share of new employment during the past decade.

Despite Senator Obama's claim that Americans earning $200,000 or more are rich or in the "CEO" class, many of them live financially pinched existences. Consider the situation of a self-employed married saleswoman living in New York City or San Francisco or Chicago. She's the sole breadwinner for her husband and two children. She earns $200,000 per year, but she is hardly rich. If she owns a home at all (purchased since the last run-up in real estate prices) it may be a small apartment in the suburbs or exurbs, but certainly not a townhouse downtown. She's probably living paycheck to paycheck.

Yet Senator Obama told CNN that these are the people whose income he intends to go after:

OBAMA: I will raise CEO taxes, there is no doubt about it. If you are...

BLITZER: What about the average American?

OBAMA: If you are a CEO in this country, you will probably pay more taxes. They won't be prohibitively high. You're going to be paying roughly what you paid in the '90s when CEOs were doing just fine...If you're making $100,000 a year or less, then you're pretty solidly middle class and you deserve relief right now as opposed to paying higher taxes. On the other hand, if you're making more than $100,000 and certainly if you're making more than $200 to $250,000, then you're doing pretty well...

This is the kind of rhetoric that killed Walter Mondale's 1984 presidential campaign and will make it very difficult for any Democratic president to get through a general election, even now.

On the other hand, pro-environment, pro-choice, progressive voters have nowhere else to go. Senator McCain won't clobber them financially, but he's hardly supportive of a progressive or even mainstream agenda on social issues. Sounds like write-in time. Or a ripe environment for a third-party challenge.

Tags:
small business,
2008 presidential election,
social security,
taxes,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Look: We OWE - We OWE so off the Cash upper 2% of the American people that steal from from the poor and give to the rich we GO. Look we Owe China Trillion's of dollars and Iraq has a 80 billion dollar surplus and we are Policeing them for free at our expense! WHY?

WAKE UP AMERICA! Bonnie you must be making over that 250K mark or you wouldn't think it is mainstream America. I'm not sure where you are from but I could live very good if I was making 200K a year. If I was making that much cheese then I would not mind paying another 15K in Social Security taxes that the Baby Boomers are going to wipe out at our current tax rate. I'm not sure if you took Economic's 101 but I took it and if you pay more than you take in then eventually you spend all that is in that account.

They aughta fire you making such a Ludicrous statement but I hope they don't because we need dumb$^% Journalist to let other people just like you see how stupid they are as well.

OBAMA&Biden 08

Concerned Citizen:Palin's Husband is a Separatist of TN 9:00AM September 05, 2008

If you haven't seen the movie, "Idiocracy", check it out and watch it. It's gross, vulgar, and childish, but VISIONARY when it comes to electing someone like Barack. The movie shows what the country could become if left to leaders the likes of Obama and to people with the profiles of his supporters.

Thinking people realize that, despite being articulate, he has yet to say anything. He speaks in generalities, and makes conceptual statements about what he's going to fix, but is without a plan. Some of the things he says are so grossly false, you have to believe he's just reading what people put in front of him, totally lacking the intelligence to catch on the the errors himself.

College students, with very little understanding of real life, could be the undoing of this country in this election. This is the price we pay for allowing the voting age to be lowered to 18 in an effort to ease our national conscience about drafting kids too young to vote, and sending them to Vietnam. Maybe we could do a better job preparing them to vote before the country goes too far under.

Our one hope for salvation is that the voting statistics are not quite what they appear. Last fall, the GOP stated that Hillary or Obama would be the easiest to defeat in a general election. In the same message, they mentioned that everyone would be able to vote in the primaries this time, and you didn't have to vote your party. I personally know of Republicans who voted for Obama or Hillary in the Primary, yet the pollsters nor the media seem to be aware of that tactic. Let's hope that millions of others did the same, and that those votes cast for Obama in the primaries will actually go to McCain in the General Election. Wouldn't that be a fantastic October Surprise!

Jacob Hall of AL 6:14PM May 15, 2008

The current payroll tax (i.e. Social Security tax) is the most regressive of taxes possible.

For you on the right, that means that the less you make or earn, the higher the percentage of your income goes to that tax.

So what the author of this column is saying, is that if you make more than $200,000 then you should pay a smaller percentage of your income in taxes. Robin Hood in reverse.

from http://www.retiredamericans.org/ht/display/ArticleDetails/i/1433/pid/324

What is the Social Security Tax Cap?

The Social Security payroll tax is 12.4 percent of wages - paid equally by the employer and the employee (6.2 percent each). The federal government currently imposes a $90,000 "cap" on taxable salary under Social Security. So President Bush - whose annual salary is $400,000 - will stop paying all his Social Security taxes on or around March 24, while American workers earning less than $90,000 will pay Social Security taxes all year long.

-------------------------------------

It is beyond time to get rid of this tax cap and make those making more money pay their fair share. I don't mind paying my own taxes, but I take offense at paying those for those who make more money than I do.

It takes money to build roads and bridges.

It takes money to maintain these.

It takes money to pay for police and fire departments and schools.

Nothing is free.

We have taxes for a reason and it is about time that those at the top of the economic ladder who are the only one who have really gotten a raise since 1972, help by paying their share of the maintenance costs for this country.

Under the current cap, a person making $45,000 a year pays 6.2% in social security taxes. But a person making $200,000 pays only 2.79% in social security taxes.

A person making $300,000 pays only 1.86%. A person making $500,000 pays only 1.11%, and a person that makes $1,000,000 pays a mere 0.56% and that is after rounding up.

Do you think that it is fair that the school teacher that makes $45,000 a year should pay a higher percentage of her income in taxes than an attorney making $250,000 a year? Is that fair?

Maybe if that attorney paid his or her fair share of the burden, we could afford to pay that teacher better than $45,000.

Obama is right about this. That tax cap needs to go. In fact, it should be reversed. If you make less that $90,000, you should not have to pay social security.

Amy of TX 3:26PM May 13, 2008

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe

Bonnie Erbe is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report and hosts PBS's weekly news analysis program, To the Contrary with Bonnie Erbe. She also writes a weekly syndicated newspaper column for Scripps Howard News Service.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

advertisement