Journalism Critics Wanted

August 8, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (35)

In the spring of 2007, George Bush was a president on the ropes. The war in Iraq was going badly, Congress considered him powerless, and the public had pretty much tossed in the towel on his ability to accomplish anything. Yet he had decided to double his bet on Iraq by sending in a "surge" of new troops, and, rather than compromising with a Congress that wanted to cut off funds for the war, he insisted on more.

In early May, we summed up the mood of an anxious Washington with a provocative cover story titled "Bush's Last Stand." Our veteran White House correspondent, Ken Walsh, walked readers through the immense challenges faced by the president and the criticisms of those who questioned his judgment. Through it all, Bush projected an almost eerie sense of calm. We pondered that and put a subhead on the cover: "Is He Resolute—or Delusional?"

We didn't intend to answer the question but rather to explore an issue on the minds of many Washington insiders. A lot of wise men were shaking their heads in astonishment at the president's actions. Still, it's not every day we open up even the possibility that the president of the United States is not thinking straight.

In the 15 months since then, a lot of things haven't improved for the president. His approval rating hovers near historic lows. His hopes to push through reforms on immigration, education, and energy appear to be dashed. But the war has seen a remarkable turnaround, in large part because of the hard decisions he made. Historians will sift the Bush legacy for years—as will we—but at this point it's fair to say that the first draft of history will show that he had the fortitude to execute one very tough call, and so far the country's better off for it.

I raise this because, as a rule, journalists aren't very good about looking back at their work. We're genetically programmed to sniff out the next story. But on big issues, I think we owe it to our readers to revisit our reporting and examine our performance from time to time. Or at least tell you how the story turned out. This seemed like one of those times.

I'd like to hear your thoughts on others. Do you think we've missed the boat on some important stories? Were we fair and thorough in our coverage? (Were we fair to the president last spring?) Or are you just curious why we handled a story a certain way? Oh, and it's OK to tell us now and then how brilliant we were.

Drop me a letter at 1050 Thomas Jefferson St. NW, Washington DC 20007, or an E-mail at editor@usnews.com. I'll respond to as many of your thoughts and concerns as I can.

—Brian Kelly

Tags:
George W. Bush,
Bush administration

Reader Comments Read all comments (35)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

americans who want access to quality healthcare paid for by someone else, must take individual responsibility for reducing their need for healthcare services. this must include at a minimum taking responsibility for a healthy lifestyle including:

1.a proper daily diet emphasing fruits and vegetables as opposed to sugars,fats,and grease.

2.a proper balance of daily exercise.

3.a proper abstinence toward substance abuse of tobacco,alcohol and all drugs-(illegal,perscription and over the counter).

4.a proper management of anger/rage toward self and others.

5.a proper emphisize toward responsible sexual behavior.

without responsibile individual behaviors over a lifetime becoming more the norm ,americans can expect either higher costs or rationing for healthcare services in the future. the surprising lack of a discussion regarding the importance of individual behaviors in our healthcare reform debate is very disturbing.

george wood of WA 12:29PM July 19, 2009

It not only sounds like a revolution but Obama has started it!

This should not surprise anyone since he ran on this platform to be elected. People wanted change but not that type!

Remember, Obama did not receive a mandate to do all of this because about 45 million voters did not vote him!

Thomas F. Roush of IN 8:21PM May 31, 2009

I have been a subscriber for many years and have always enjoyed US News and World Report. Last year when our subscription was cut from fifty two copies to 26 copies I understood that our subscription price was doubled and that it was due to troubled times. I never understood why some issues were called "double issues" when there were the same am't of pages. No one was ever able to explain it. Also, I never understood why this change wasn't made when our subscription expired. We already paid for 52 issues per year. Now in 2009, without notice, our issues are cut to 12 per year which is another slap in the face. We are now paying 4 x's the original price because we are getting 1/4 of the issues that were promised in your advertising. I think we deserve a better answer than the answer we have been receiving, which was that we will be receiving more information in each issue. This is an insult to our intelligence. Thankyou, Michael Massi

Michael Massi 8:24AM January 22, 2009

Editor's Note

Brian Kelly was named editor of U.S.News & World Report in April 2007, nine years after joining the magazine. With more than 30 years of journalism experience, including covering Capitol Hill, politics, and the presidency both as a beat reporter and as an editor, Kelly is one of the nation’s most experienced magazine editors in steering national and international news content.

advertisement

advertisement