• Comment (7)

Student Loan Interest Rates Just the Tip of College Cost Iceberg

April 26, 2012 RSS Feed Print

David Brodwin is a cofounder and board member of American Sustainable Business Council.

Congress and the presidential candidates are debating whether to let the rates on student loans double to 6.8 percent. This issue has grabbed headlines, but it's little more than a sideshow. Even if rates are kept down, the student loan program doesn't come close to meeting the challenge of soaring tuition. It doesn't allow America's youth to acquire the skills they need to compete in a tough global marketplace.

Education is the path to progress, both for individuals and for the nation. America has invested in education for more than a century. We built land grant colleges in 1862; made grade school free and compulsory by 1918; educated 8.8 million veterans on the G.I. Bill from 1944 to 1956; and bolstered science in the 1960s in response to Sputnik. 

[Read the U.S. News debate: Is a College Degree Still Worth It?]

We owe our freedom to these investments, as well as our prosperity. In World War II we barely won the race to develop radar and the atomic bomb. Without America's investment in higher education, we could easily have lost.

Regardless of what happens to student loan interest rates, college is slipping out of reach for more and more Americans. The real problem is that states have drastically reduced their support for state colleges and universities. The reductions were caused in part by the recession, in part by unfunded retirement costs, and in part to pay for tax cuts. As a result, state colleges and universities have boosted tuition, trimmed enrollment, and eliminated many courses.

For example, the state of California has slashed its support of the California State University system. To cover the gap, the university has hiked tuition by 15 percent per year on average, a four-fold increase since 2001. Nationally, tuition has gone up 8 percent per year on average, while incomes have been flat for most people.

[Peter Fenn: Obama Overlooks For-Profit Colleges Ripping Off Taxpayers]

To make matters even worse, state colleges and universities are accepting fewer in-state students so they can fill their classes with out-of-state and foreign students who pay much more. The University of California has more than doubled its recruitment of out-of-state students who pay about $36,000 per year. Meanwhile, it has denied admission to nearly 20,000 deserving and fully-qualified California residents, who would pay only about $13,000 per year. This shift brings in nearly a half billion dollars in extra revenue to the university each year.

The U of C (University of California) is on its way to becoming the U of ABC (Anywhere-But-California). At the current rate, by 2020 more than half the students will come from out of state. For all practical purposes, this trend will kill affordable higher education in America.

The problem is greatest in the STEM fields: science, technology, engineering, and math. These fields account for more than half of America's economic growth. STEM provides the greatest benefit to employers, the greatest earning potential, the greatest protection from unemployment, and the greatest overall contribution to the economy. Yet, about 22 percent of the jobs in STEM fields are filled on a short-term basis by foreign-born workers on H-1B visas. Many of these highly skilled workers ultimately return to their countries of origin and build world-class companies there, rather than here. It's a loss we can't afford.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Should H-1B Visas Be Easier to Get?]

Increased funding for higher education is only part of the answer. We need to cast a wide net in our search for innovative solutions. For example, the best lecturers have discovered they can distribute their knowledge far more efficiently over the Internet than through the universities of today. Personal tutorials can be conducted over Skype. Universities can slash the administrative costs that have soared over the past decade. The college experience need not involve four years in residence in low-rise ivy-covered buildings arranged in a quad. There are other ways to impart knowledge and skills.

In conclusion, the interest rate on student debt is just a small part of the problem of college affordability. To keep America strong we must ensure that education is within reach of all who are ready to pursue it. It will take a combination of bigger budgets, innovative delivery, and new strategies for financing to prepare our youth for the jobs of the future and to help American companies to compete.

Tags:
economy,
education,
student loans

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

There is plenty of blame to go around. Colleges seem to be more worried about being "world class" than being affordable. They continue to dump money into atheletics that drain the system of money that could be used to keep tuition down. As Universities compete for prestige and research dollars, the students they are supposed to educate are being priced out. On an income of $75,000 a year, I am expected to pay about $20,000 to send my daughter to college. I will do so by cutting my family budget down to bare necessities so she isn't burdened with debt as she starts her adult life. When the college comes looking for my approval for a tax increase or donations, I will laugh. As far as I am concerned they are getting all they will get out of me.

Daniel Freysinger of CO 4:47AM May 14, 2012

This column is generally perceptive (save for its misinformed enthusiasm about on-line courses, see below). But the author misses a chance to clinch the argument. The scandalous rate of growth in public higher ed tuition has one ultimate cause: the collective belief that higher ed is not a public good. Reflecting the will of their voters, Tea Party anti-big government politicians regard it as a private good, not deserving of taxpayer support. Their solution? Let the state universities fend for themselves in the free market. The result? Well, smart deans and chancellors seize opportunities where they find them: they replace low-paying in-state residents with out-of-staters or foreigners; they take advantage of plentiful dollars from federal loans (the mortgage crisis redux), they let tuition rise as high as the market will bear (and in a post-industrial economy, many people will continue to want the college BA). Now about those on-line courses: many public universities actually charge a *premium* for on-line courses, since people are willing to pay more for the convenience. Moreover, it takes *a lot* of money to operate decent on-line instruction. The learning management software is expensive and requires constant updates; professors and graduate students must still grade course work (at least above the introductory courses that use multiple choice tests). The field of *high quality* on-line higher ed is in constant ferment. The low-hanging fruit has already been plucked (vocational education from Apollo, Univ of Phoenix, etc.). Please don't be naive about the cost-savings from virtual higher ed.

exeter76us of WI 12:35AM April 29, 2012

Current student and recent graduates saddled with student loan debt have to start getting creative. Exchanging labor for rent is a way save money, learn tangible skills, and get satisfaction outside of a standard white-collar job. Find an old building, or a cool old house that is in disrepair.. work with the owners and start rehabbing it in exchange for rent/equity. You can follow a project like this at http://www.jarboeinitiative.com/

Nick Ward-Bopp of MO 9:58AM April 27, 2012

Economic Intelligence

Insights, perspectives, and commentary on the economy. Follow it on Twitter @EconomicIntel.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement