• Comment (14)

How the Affordable Care Act Helps the U.S. Economy

March 29, 2012 RSS Feed Print

David Brodwin is a cofounder and board member of American Sustainable Business Council.

This week, the Supreme Court heard arguments over whether President Obama’s healthcare legislation is constitutional. It’s easy to get lost in tedious legal details, but let’s not neglect the critical patient at the heart of this case: the U.S. economy. If we don’t take bold steps to reinvent our healthcare system, that patient will decline and die.

The current healthcare system threatens our prosperity in three ways: It burdens the overall economy; it undermines individual businesses and the jobs they provide; and it saps the productivity of American workers. These threats confront both those of us who have insurance and those of us who don’t.

[See a collection of political cartoons on healthcare.]

Our current healthcare system burdens the overall economy because it is far too expensive compared to the health benefits it delivers. In fact, the United States spends about 50 percent more on healthcare than any other developed country (as a fraction of our total national economy) and we get less for it on the measures that matter. What matters is how long people live and how healthy they are, not how many coronary bypasses were performed. As a former management consultant, I can tell you that no CEO would tolerate a division that spent 50 percent more than its competitors, and didn’t have much better results to show for it.

In the United States, the total cost for healthcare is around 16 percent of Gross Domestic Product, known as GDP. This includes what we pay directly to insurance companies and doctors, and what we pay indirectly to Medicare and other programs. Simply put, for every dollar you spend to purchase something, whether a loaf of bread or a new car, 16 cents goes to healthcare. Most other developed countries pay far less, about 9-12 percent of GDP. This includes many countries where people live longer and with less disability. The cost difference, roughly 5 percent of GDP, works out to $750 billion dollars every year, more than half the annual federal deficit!  

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

If we could recapture the money that is now lost to inefficiencies in the healthcare system, we could strengthen our economy tremendously. Whether we put this money toward reducing the federal debt or improving our schools or advancing scientific research, every dollar could be put to work in ways that make America a better, tougher competitor.

Every U.S. company takes a beating from soaring healthcare costs. American manufacturers pay directly for the healthcare of their employees; their competitors in China, Japan, Germany, and most other countries don’t. American companies must pass these costs on to their customers, which makes their products more expensive. The healthcare cost built into each new General Motors automobile is about $1,200; healthcare now is the single most expensive “part” in a new American car. This extra cost can spell the difference between gaining market share and hiring--or losing market share and laying off workers.

[Photo Gallery: Supreme Court Hears Health Care Reform Arguments.]

Small businesses suffer more than big businesses from our inefficient healthcare system. Any small business owner will confirm that soaring premiums afflict their bottom line. A national poll of 500 small business owners found that the “cost of health coverage” ranked No. 2 on their list of important problems, second only to “weak customer demand.”

Some of the damage from our healthcare system is more subtle, but it hurts nonetheless. When someone hesitates to start a new business because she can’t risk a gap in coverage, America loses jobs. When someone can’t bring his “best game” to work because he can’t afford medicine he needs, productivity falls.

America’s healthcare system is clearly broken. Although it offers the latest and greatest in medical technology it is among the worst from the standpoint of the care we get versus the care we pay for. Some politicians want to leave the inefficient system in place. But this would just prolong a system that costs too much per person and consumes too much of America’s wealth. To solve this big problem we need bold changes, starting with universal coverage with an individual mandate, as provided by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This is a first step toward inventing a system with which we can both live and prosper. It breathes new life into our economic future.

Tags:
economy,
healthcare,
healthcare reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

If the indiviguals mandate runs along part lines ,as predicted,then all bell will break loose.Then the SCOTUS justices have a multitude of problems to solve ,such as if one mandate is unconstitutional,than all the rest are the same as well.Mandates ,such as home owners insurence,auto insurence,Federal and state income taxes,SocialSecurity ,FICA,state driver licensing,the list goes on.Plus as the justices go,they loose all credibility as a compedent decision making group.They'll be seen as old incompedent fools in gowns,and should be treated as such.Then as the country moves on,big corporations will run things ,leaving the government powerless.Because without mandates or rules there isn't any organizational structure to keep the country in place,anarchy then follows.Read world histories of great countries,no rules,no government....

Pete of FL 11:06PM April 03, 2012

The changes in employment over the last twenty or so years, required a new approach to health coverage. Fewer people work for one company that provides health and pension benefits, more temp workers, and greater outsourcing to companies that might use part timers who may or may not get adeguate health coverage or any coverage at all. It is ironic that Democrats supported this bill and Republicans are against it. It is no accident that Romney 'invented' it as a businessman and initially a moderate Republican, he must have understood its importance.

Diana S. of NY 12:31PM April 03, 2012

I'm sorry, but this is just pablum.

Obamacare does NOTHING to fix what is wrong with the healthcare system, and much to compound the problems it already has.

The problem is government involvement in healthcare.

Mandates for coverage for things that people would not otherwise want. Mammogram coverage - for men is mandated in many states, prostate exams are mandated for women.

If health insurance was allowed to cover only catastrophic injury or serious illness, it would affordable for everyone.

But the system we have now would be like outlawing used cars. The amount of people who could afford a car would decrease. But the solution would not be requiring people to buy cars, or to buy new cars for the poor, but rather to get rid of the stupid crony-capitalist law.

We need government out of healthcare. Repeal medicare - seniors are the wealthiest people in society. Repeal medicaid - before it, most of what it now covers was done pro bono. Get rid of the mandates, and let people buy only the coverage they want.

Get rid of the tax incentives for employers to provide health insurance, and let's get health insurance back to being insurance.

Because right now it's not, we use it for everything.

Mike of CT 12:45PM April 01, 2012

Economic Intelligence

Insights, perspectives, and commentary on the economy. Follow it on Twitter @EconomicIntel.

advertisement

Latest Videos

advertisement