Secret Service Shouldn't Take Blame for White House Crasher Scandal

December 4, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (20)

By Doug Heye, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

If there's one recent story I've taken no interest in, it's been the saga of Tareq and Michaele Salahi, the couple that crashed the White House state dinner for the Primer Minister of India. They're on minute 12 of their 15 minutes of fame and, frankly, I don't want to reset the clock in their favor or subject anyone to more noise about the biggest non-issue to hit the White House since President Barack Obama's golfing partners became a national issue.

Obviously Congress was going to investigate the incident. Tactless social climbing aside, that a couple could get that close to the President and Vice President—without an invitation—is troubling. What has the White House's reaction been? To stonewall, protect their own people, find the nearest bus and throw the United States Secret Service under it.

Despite Obama's repeated claims of transparency, the White House is not allowing their own personnel to testify at a hearing of the House Homeland Security Committee (Tiger Woods has been more forthcoming than the Obama White House), instead throwing Mark Sullivan, head of the Secret Service, to the wolves of Congress—not to mention the cameras.

Following the hearing, on the same day Obama held a "jobs summit," three employees of the Secret Service's uniformed officer division have been put on administrative leave. It is widely expected that the public servants will be fired.

The Secret Service did their job. They ensured they everyone was safe to enter and that the President and Vice President were not put at risk. The Secret Service is not there to be glorified bouncers, making a list of attendees and checking it twice. That's the job of the host organization—in this case, the White House.

Perhaps no one explained the issue better than Democratic Rep. Loretta Sanchez (she of awesome Christmas cards): "It's always been my experience that the White House—either social or legislative division, in the case of when Congress people are coming—are always at the front gate. I mean, come on, even Wal-Mart has a greeter." (Clearly something has gone wrong when a Congressional Democrat cites Wal-Mart as a positive example.)

Heck, anyone who has ever seen an episode of The Love Boat knows you're not getting on the Lido Deck—much less a seat at Captain Stubing's table—unless Julie, Doc, Gopher or Isaac has assigned you a cabin!

"I could not have more confidence in the Secret Service," President Obama has stated. Perhaps he could put that confidence in action by reinstating the Secret Service officers put on the chopping block to save the White House any further loss of political face.

Tags:
Secret Service,
White House

Reader Comments Read all comments (20)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Security is and always will be a tight rope walk in any open society. If the SS was to do it's job to the fullest, guest would be subjected to a much more rigorous and in depth screening and searches. 90 day back ground checks and body searches would be the norm. And the white house tour, press conferences, public appearances. forget it. If there was an error it was on the side of open access and yes that is a security issue. But who controls access and who enforces it. The White House controls it, the SS enforces it, and by historical precedent when any tow government agencies are responsible for something there must be a clear and proscribed hierarchy in place or there will be mistakes. As with the military there should be a clear and documented chain of responsibility for every aspect of the event.

I think a possible solution is to put a social liaison office from the white house social secretary's off in the White House SS office and a SS liaison on the White House social secretary's office. Just to make sure that every body is reading from the same piece of music for any and all presidential public events.

Kevin C. of MO 6:28AM December 07, 2009

The Scary thing about the "crash" by uninvited persons is that the security

of the White House had been and compromised .

I don't think that the President and his social secretary understand high level

security and compromise .

What is the Department of Defense doing giving clearances to anyone into

the White House .

I recall the days of General Curtis LeMay (sp) and the Strategic Air Command .

That was real security .

I truly hope that The Pres. and his staff take this last compromise very

seriously - hire a very competent Security Chief ;that the Social Secretary

become personally involved in EVERY event and not sit with the guests for pictures .

Caution -she should know how well all of her subordinates are trained in high

level security .

We're all human and can err- it's how well we can learn from our errors .

Your "Brother " in His Love .

CE(Chuck)Williams

CE(Chuck) williams of WA 3:23AM December 07, 2009

Gentlemen -

Thanks for your honest assessment. The idea that the SS was permitted to take the fall gives me great concern about an administration that was keen on transparency and honesty.

SInce it's has been repeatedly established that there was not inherent safety issue since these folks were actually screened in the same manner as the other 300+ guests, then it is fair to say that the SS, even after considering the variables and mitigating circumstances.... not to mention the lack of staff on scene to resolve the couple's legitimate or manufactured confusion due to conflicting emails, voicemails, etc., was at fault for not adhering to its own policy the same way that a highway patrolman is guilty of violating his/her own department's policies, when they let you drive off after having pulled you over for traffic violation.

Poor use of discretion? Maybe, but not a "failing" as has been described.

Art Klein of AZ 1:01PM December 06, 2009

Doug Heye

Doug Heye

A veteran of political campaigns throughout the country since 1990, Doug Heye has served in leading communications positions in the House of Representatives and United States Senate, as well as serving in the George W. Bush administration. Most recently he was the communications director for the Republican National Committee. He is currently a Washington-based GOP communications strategist.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

Calling Terrorism What It Is

Refusing to call terrorism by its name helps no one.

Latest Videos

advertisement