Beware the Food Police and Their Soda Tax

October 16, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Doug Heye, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

In his 2001 book A Cook's Tour, chef/television host Anthony Bourdain describes a war in the United Kingdom:

It's war. A fight for the hearts, minds, and souls of future generations. If the dark forces win? They'll be looking across the Atlantic; don't doubt that for a second. They already have their operatives in place. They'll be looking at your plate, inspecting your refrigerator. They already are. They want to take your meat away.

They even want your cheese.

But the same struggle is already being waged here in the States, too—in our legislatures, our restaurants and our kitchens.

A tax on sodas is "an idea worth exploring," President Barack Obama said earlier this month, the thought being that if you are taxed every time you pop open a Dr. Pepper, you'll buy and consume less Dr. Pepper, especially if you're an elementary student at lunch.

President Obama is not alone. Thomas Frieden, Obama's director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, also supports a soda tax.

The fight is not limited to someone's Diet Coke habit. It's an effort to control what you eat, how it's made, and how much of it you can have. And it's been taking place, throughout the nation, for years. A few examples:

  • In 2006, the use of trans-fat in New York City restaurants was made unlawful, an effort spearheaded by Frieden, then New York City health commissioner.
  • That same year, the city of Chicago banned foie gras, leading foie gras consumption underground to "Duckeasies," similar to the "Speakeasies" of the Al Capone days. (Chicago later repealed the ban, a rare display of government sanity.)
  • California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed into law a bill banning all foie gras production in the state by 2012.
  • In 1992, New Jersey, a state where the deep fried hot dog at Rutt's Hut, "The Ripper," is legendary, banned runny eggs in restaurants.
  • North Carolina has banned restaurants from serving hamburgers medium-rare, despite the patrons' wishes.

The hamburger has become a new cause celebre for the food police eager to exploit food safety fears. While it had been on the health police's radar for years, In-n-Out Burger lovers were blissfully unaware. That is until Monday's "Larry King Live," where, in a program titled "Should Americans ban the burger?" panelists tripped over each other in an effort to denounce the hamburger and appear as the most anti-meat.

Healthy foods are a target, as well. According to last week's report by the Center for Science in the Public Interest—who led the charge to end the use of coconut oil for popcorn at movie theatres—E. coli, Norovirus and Salmonella lurk in foods parents have been trying to get children to eat for eternity; Eggs, tuna, potatoes, cheese, tomatoes and, most dangerous of all, leafy greens like Popeye's favorite, spinach.

To battle these diseases in otherwise healthy food, the center and do-gooders everywhere recommend, you guessed it, more government regulation. The kind that raises the cost of a nice salad and makes that bucket of chicken from KFC look more and more affordable.

We've known for years a lot of these foods are not healthy. Common sense tells us that glazed doughnuts and Fritos are not as healthy as, say, wheat germ and organic pomegranate juice. And some super-sized products are so clearly unhealthy they're practically pornographic.

But the answer is not the banning of products, additional regulation, and higher taxes liberals see as the solution to all of life's problems. The answer is in parents providing healthy alternatives for their children, teaching them about food and where it comes from, and for teenagers and adults to step away from the 64-ounce Big Gulp every once in awhile.

And while the vegetables coming from the White House garden will likely not be eaten due to high levels of toxic materials, first lady Michelle Obama has set an admirable example, especially for schools.

"People don't necessarily want Big Brother telling them what to eat or drink, and I understand that," President Obama said, leaving the door open to a soda tax. (Note the use of the word "necessarily." When a Democrat doesn't close the door on a new tax, they've left it wide open.)

Obama's Big Brother analogy is in the right direction, but given the zealotry with which the food police seek to control everything you eat we could someday end up echoing Charlton Heston's chilling warning, "Soylent Green is people!"

Tags:
taxes,
food and drink

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

In my home state of Kansas, this is about balancing the budget but promoted as an attempt to improve our health. The tax money goes straight to the general fund. Our budget has expanded faster than our waistline and now they are trying to shrink the shortfall by claiming to make us healthier by controlling what we eat and drink. I laughed it off when the tobacco people claimed food would be next. A local health official said that parent's should be arrested for child abuse for buying fast food and making their kids fat and I thought he was half kidding. This is no joke and we'd better pay attention. We need to head this off before it gets worse. I plan to hold elected people accountable in the voting booth and I don't care what party they belong to. We need to send a message that we,as voters, are still in charge.

Rose of Kansas of KS 11:28AM April 05, 2010

The answer is always the parents and family... Great for all the people (i.e. you and your clique) that have such things. Others are not so fortunate. That's why "liberals" are so deviously set on HELPING PEOPLE.

I agree, banning, etc can and has gotten out of control in many areas.

However a "Soda Tax" is a reasonable thing to explore as soda has had an ENORMOUS impact on the health of Americans, and recommending that mommy and daddy do a better job is flat stupid and unproductive.

Why is moderation and common sense so evil in 2009?

There is a place for govt in many thing, and this "all gov is bad" mentality that lazy ignorant populist conservatism seems to fall back on constantly is really sad.

Doug of IA 5:26PM October 30, 2009

It all started with the tabacco tax, but that was a tax on those evil smokers, so that was a good idea, and most non smokers didn't say a word in protest. Well, an unfair tax that singles out any one group is wrong. Maybe if their were more support against the tabacco tax from the soda groups, Big Brother wouldn't be coming after them now.

Norris Wacasey of MO 8:18PM October 24, 2009

Doug Heye

Doug Heye

A veteran of political campaigns throughout the country since 1990, Doug Heye has served in leading communications positions in the House of Representatives and United States Senate, as well as serving in the George W. Bush administration. Most recently he was the communications director for the Republican National Committee. He is currently a Washington-based GOP communications strategist.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

No White Knight to Save Republicans

The GOP is stuck with Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, or Paul.

Mary Kate Cary

Politics 101 for the GOP

Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum and the rest of the GOP pack are not so far apart.

Latest Video

advertisement