Obama Should Decline the Nobel Peace Prize

October 9, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (18)

By Doug Heye, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

The news that President Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize has many asking, "um, why?"

Was the award for ending or winning the war in Iraq? No.

Was the award for ending or winning the war in Afghanistan? No.

What about following through on his campaign pledge to immediately close Gitmo? Certainly not.

Democrats are quick to say that criticisms from the G.O.P. are dangerous and unpatriotic. Brad Woodhouse, communications director of the Democratic National Committee (and in full disclosure, a friend and all around great guy) incredibly issued a statement charging that "The Republican Party has thrown in its lot with the terrorists—the Taliban and Hamas this morning—in criticizing the President."

Hyperbole aside, it's nice to see Democrats willing to call Hamas terrorists, though it doesn't explain why Obama is more willing to work with them than Republicans in Washington.

But it's not just Republicans who are questioning the Nobel committee's decision. Lech Walesa, former Polish President, Solidarity leader and recipient of the 1983 Nobel Peace Prize said, "So soon? Too early. He has no contribution so far."

Even White House officials were amazed, reportedly asking if today is April Fool's Day.

The award could pose political problems for Obama, both at home and abroad. With the international accolades now official, there's less incentive for Obama to act in a fashion that continues to seek worldwide favor. And coming off an embarrassing visit to Copenhagen, traveling to Oslo to be congratulated by the international elite for things he hasn't yet done could appear as selfish at a time when unemployment (and deficits) creep higher.

Perhaps the best thing Obama can do is politely decline the award, saying that, while honored, he has been president for only nine months and still has much to accomplish. Such a move not only would be hard for any party, political or otherwise, to criticize, it might also be the right thing to do.

Tags:
Nobel Prize,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

For those who're yelling the loudest for President Barack Obama to return the Nobel Peace Prize, I say let's do something to quiet the Glenn Beck/Rush Limbaugh followers. Why don't they give the Nobel Peace Prize to Glenn Beck. Onb second thought, maybe they would consider splitting the award between Beck and Limbaugh. These two guys alone have done more to destroy racial relationships amongst our citizens than than any person or group over the past 2 years.

Not only have they spread hate between the races, but politically, they have drawn deep devisive lines between democrat and republican, liberal and conservative. Their followers are dividing into "tea baggers,deathers, and birthers."

By giving this award to Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh, they can show the whole world that no matter how nasty and hateful these two individuals are, the world is looking for something positive. No matter how spiteful and critical they are, of everyone they perceive as different, the world is ready to embrace President Barack Obama's "Hope For Peace" agenda.

For me, I would just love ton have the opportunity to watch Glenn Beck's acceptance speech. That would be pay back for all the bad things he said about people while wiping away those crocodile tears.

len williams of CA 9:11PM October 24, 2009

I guess the Norwegians really liked his views on Michael Jackson dying...or for that matter his views on the final four pick last march!!!! after all that is all he has accomplished....I am surprised the media hasn't asked for his views on Jon and Kate, or for that matter he hasn't tried to mediate their situation with a family cookout at the white house!!!

Whats next the ESPYS giving him an award for playing basketball in his backyard, or the academy awards giving him an award for his role as playing a president

D'nissha of OH 2:07AM October 17, 2009

!.4 million dollars will allow ACORN to buy another 1.4 million votes next election when Obama donates the money to one of their bogus names. One buck per vote, Hey it cost them a cigarette last election to get a vote.

Decline the prize, sure and Liberals will become normal respectable people.

DOES IT MATTER, HONESTLY of FL 1:50PM October 13, 2009

Doug Heye

Doug Heye

A veteran of political campaigns throughout the country since 1990, Doug Heye has served in leading communications positions in the House of Representatives and United States Senate, as well as serving in the George W. Bush administration. Most recently he was the communications director for the Republican National Committee. He is currently a Washington-based GOP communications strategist.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement