Corzine’s Weight Attacks on Christie Demonstrate Media, Democrat Hypocrisy

October 8, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Doug Heye, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

"Corzine Points Spotlight at Christie's Weight" reads the headline in today's New York Times, capturing Jon Corzine's line of attack in the New Jersey gubernatorial race: Republican Chris Christie is too heavy to serve as governor.

As the article states, a Corzine commercial attacking Christie shows the candidate emerging from an SUV "in extreme slow motion, his extra girth moving, just as slowly, in several different directions at once." Reinforcing the attack, the ad says Christie "threw his weight around."

"Threw his weight around," get it? As the Times article says, it is "about as subtle as a playground taunt."

Campaigns are rife with playground taunts, but imagine the reaction if a Republican said a Democrat candidate "went both ways" on gay marriage. Without question, it would be denounced as homophobic and receive wide attention, as opposed to the collective yawn Corzine's attacks have received until the Times article.

Similarly, anyone looking for outrage over Richard Wolffe's comments on Countdown with Keith Olbermann Monday night that Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele was a "token" selected as party chair to "cover themselves against any accusations of racism" in the Obama age was more likely to hear crickets chirping—just as Democrats and the media stayed mum in 2006 when House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer called Steele "slavish," Maryland State Senate President Mike Miller labeled Steele an "Uncle Tom," and Barack Obama himself, of whom any questioning of his readiness to be president was deemed racist, told a Maryland audience in 2006 that Steele was too inexperienced to join Obama in the Senate. (Full disclosure: I served on Steele's 2006 Senate campaign.)

(And Wolffe forgets recent history. There was a conservative grassroots movement pushing Steele as RNC chair after the 2006 election, as reported in the Washington Post. But why let reality get in the way of rhetoric?)

For Republicans, however, condemnation is quick and severe.

Earlier this week, BET founder Sheila Johnson was forced to apologize over a video of Johnson imitating Virginia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Creigh Deeds's stammer, but only after the National Stuttering Foundation condemned Johnson, asking, "Do you also make fun of people in wheelchairs, or do you believe stuttering is the only disability it's ok to ridicule?"

Yesterday, a National Republican Congressional Committee press release criticizing Speaker Nancy Pelosi's pronouncements on Afghanistan and suggesting the speaker be "put in her place," led to a firestorm. MSNBC—which ignored Wolffe's racially charged comments on the same network—repeatedly attacked the committee as sexist, and the statement was a topic of Pelosi's press conference this morning.

You see, when such attacks are made on Democrats, they are hateful and sexist, but if done to a Republican, well, what's the problem?

The problem, it turns out, is hypocrisy.

Tags:
Jon Corzine

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

интеретсный блог почему только так мало читателей на нём

kikus of AL 8:35PM June 12, 2010

Your essay is misleading and hypocritical. You give the impression that the Corzine commercial uses the narrative "throws his weight around" as a voiceover while an unflattering video of Christie emerging from an SUV is shown. This is categorically untrue. The voiceover and the image occur at distinctly different points in the commercial--they are not connected. There is narrative in between the time the phrase "throws his weight around" is used and when the image is shown, and there are different images shown between the two points in the commercial.

Second, regarding the hypothetical use of the phrase "goes both ways" in reference to a Democratic politician's position on gay marriage--your hypothetcial makes no sense unless you apply it to a specific Democratic politician. In fact, you COULD apply it to a politician like Bill Clinton, and any Republican would be safe from criticism. It would probably even get a laugh. Perhaps not so much if you applied it to a politician like Larry Craig.....oops! he's Republican. Or Mark Foley. Oops...another Republican. Or Charlie Crist....oops...OOPS! But go ahead with Democrats like Elliot Spitzer and John Edwards, particularly since Ann Coulter has already called Edwards a fag.

There may well come a day when you can accuse Obama of 'going both ways' on the issue of gay marriage. So save your gag (oops!) line and use it freely and liberally (oops!) when he finally changes his own hypocritically (wide) stance (oops!) on the issue. I bet no one will give you any grief at all.

Lycomb Young of SC 1:09PM October 12, 2009

Has Christie looked in the mirror, that's one fate and ugly dude!

Tom Paine of NJ 11:11AM October 09, 2009

Doug Heye

Doug Heye

A veteran of political campaigns throughout the country since 1990, Doug Heye has served in leading communications positions in the House of Representatives and United States Senate, as well as serving in the George W. Bush administration. Most recently he was the communications director for the Republican National Committee. He is currently a Washington-based GOP communications strategist.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement