Panetta at Pentagon Is Smart, But Is There a Petraeus-CIA Plot?

April 29, 2011 RSS Feed Print

The Obama administration announced this week that CIA Director Leon Panetta will replace Bob Gates as the secretary of Defense. Panetta is a shrewd and well-respected Washington operator who formerly served in Congress as well as in the Clinton White House. He is a known political moderate often credited with a keen, measured management style and a thorough policy mind. It will be a tough duty to replace Gates, who many cite as one of the best Pentagon bosses in recent history. But Panetta is certainly as equipped for the task as anyone on the Democratic roster.

[Read 10 things you didn't know about Panetta.]

The more curious move is the man Obama tapped to fill Panetta's CIA spot—Gen. David Petraeus. As I have written before, Petraeus is an impressive figure who many thought could be the next Dwight Eisenhower. He is a career military man with impeccable service credentials who has garnered the respect of almost every legislator and member of the administration, and who just happens to be a Princeton Ph.D. to boot. Generally credited with turning around the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, Petraus is a soldier first and foremost, who respects the wishes of his commanding officer—in this case, President Obama. [See editorial cartoons on Afghanistan.]

That said, career spooks are already beginning to chafe at the Petraeus CIA pick. And maybe with good reason. Petraeus has little experience in intelligence, and the CIA is traditionally run by a career civilian. (Petraeus is set to resign his military post if he is confirmed.) Running Langley is no small task, and considering the role the CIA played in the run up to the Iraq war, the stakes are all that much higher.

One can't help but wonder if President Obama made Petraeus an offer he couldn't refuse—ala Jon Huntsman Jr.—for the betterment of the Democratic Party. While that theory may scream conspiracy to most, it certainly can't be wholly discounted.

Tags:
Leon Panetta,
David Petraeus,
White House,
Congress,
Dwight D. Eisenhower,
Barack Obama,
democratic party,
politics,
Iraq war (2003-2011),
CIA,
Jon Huntsman,
national security terrorism and the military,
War in Afghanistan (2001-)

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I wouldn't discount it at all. Petraeus is the most qualified and best-polling candidate for 2012. That's why the folks at http://americansforpetraeus2012.org are busy working to make his nomination a reality.

Peter of AZ 2:34PM April 29, 2011

A great Texas A & M man...

Luther of LA, Senator barry was for Afghanistan war. With citizen now dying in Syia today, barry may be heading us there. But then, no oil, just bodies...

Bill Hedges of MO 11:13AM April 29, 2011

Peculiar bureaucratic shuffle for sure. Perhaps easier to abandon the Afghanistan albatross with Petraeus out of there.

Luther of LA 10:49AM April 29, 2011

Cameron Lynch

Cameron Lynch

Cameron Lynch is president the Lynch Group, a government relations, political consulting and government contracting firm. Formerly with the Bipartisan Policy Center, Lynch has worked for Sen. John McCain and former Sen. Bob Dole, among others. He teaches classes in political campaign strategy and historic Congressional agreements at the George Washington University Graduate School of Political Management.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement