Tragic Flaws Could Sink Newt Gingrich in 2012 Race

March 17, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (14)

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich appears to (finally) be inching closer toward an official announcement of his candidacy. Despite some initial stumbles (one top aide leaking an impending formal announcement, which promptly generated a retraction by Gingrich’s official spokesperson the next day) Gingrich appears to be well on his way to joining what will surely be a crowded GOP presidential field.

Few observers, including those on the Democratic side, question the vigor of Gingrich’s intellect and policy mind. He is a wonk’s wonk who can expound on the federal budget (a subject in which he possesses infamous experience) healthcare, energy policy, and education reform. Truth be told, when it comes to a strict policy debate with President Obama (with the possible exception of Mitch Daniels--who appears more and more likely not to run) Newt would likely outperform all the other potential Republican candidates.

[Read 10 things you didn't know about Mitch Daniels.]

Despite these credentials, Gingrich maintains two tragic, if not fatal flaws. The first is that the American electorate does not vote on policy positions alone. Style, substance, demeanor and, let’s face it, likability all factor into electoral decisions. To some on the right, Gingrich is heralded for his take no prisoners approach to governance. The majority of voters (including some Republicans), however, perceive him as gruff and unwilling to entertain any opinion other than his own. It’s beneficial to be the smartest guy in the room, but it’s detrimental to know it.

Speaker Gingrich also recently stumbled when explaining his marital infidelities while working the social conservative base. His “I cheated for America” line fell flat and discouraged many who hoped he would have concocted a better answer. The majority of Americans (including this one) who believe in a forgiving God would have been satisfied had he simply said: “I sinned, it was wrong.” More broadly, it is unclear whether evangelical conservatives (an extremely important voting block in early primary states such as Iowa and South Carolina) are willing to back a thrice married, self-admitted adulterer.

[Vote now: Who is your pick for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination?]

These negatives aside, Gingrich does possess some visible momentum. He continues to raise money at a breakneck pace, contribute to conservative movements and causes and is making the stump rounds with the best of them. One might view Gingrich’s 12-year absence from government service as a detriment, but with an American electorate that considers all things Washington evil, Gingrich could turn this absence into an advantage. Gingrich also maintains a high national name ID--always a critical element in any electoral contest. Moreover, Gingrich preserves an army of loyalists who worked for or with him during his time in office. One former Gingrich staffer recently informed me that “we’re around, we’re active, and we’re ready.”

The former speaker certainly possesses the intellectual tools necessary to make a successful GOP primary run. The question for team Gingrich is if he can maintain this policy emphasis while strengthening and arming his political machinery for battle.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Mitch Daniels,
energy policy and climate change,
Congress,
Republican Party,
deficit and national debt,
2012 presidential election,
healthcare reform,
Newt Gingrich,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Who gives a crap what you think? This is an American election. The world needs to butt out! MYOB! (mind your own business)

USofA of CA 11:35AM May 09, 2011

oh, pleazzze.... Let's see, on the one hand we have a guy who, like millions of Americans, was married more than once, on the other we have a dedicated Marxist. More than one marraige/Marxist .... Seems like a no-brainer to me.

On the one hand you have milk toast Republicans who are more worried about Senate decorum than calling a spade a spade. Hmmmm, truth-teller or cowardly lion? Seems like a no brainer to me.

Of course the other Republican alternative is the guys like McCain, who only get it right when it's the acceptable thing to do, or their back is against the wall.

Then there's Mr. Sweetness and Light (Huckabee), Mr. Arrogance (Trump), Mr. Blah (Pawlenty), Mr. Country Club Republican (Romney), Mrs. Palin, who would be great but the insecure McCain made her radioactive, Mrs. Bachman, also great, but hasn't got a chance for the same reason. Looks like Gingrich to me.

What happened when Paul Ryan stood up and told the truth? The cowardly Dems, and the Marxist president, immeadiately saw at least some of the light. We need COURAGE, not cowardice; IDEAS, not warm and cuddly. If cuddly is what America wants, than the quote "In a democracy you get the government you deserve" is definitly, and unfortunately, true.

T. Lukach of VA 10:33AM April 14, 2011

The recession was caused by Clinton’s bad housing plan for poor.. Along with lawyer obama/Acorn help.

Lewinsky & all the other women was Cinton's doing...

Bill Hedges of MO 9:05AM March 19, 2011

Cameron Lynch

Cameron Lynch

Cameron Lynch is president the Lynch Group, a government relations, political consulting and government contracting firm. Formerly with the Bipartisan Policy Center, Lynch has worked for Sen. John McCain and former Sen. Bob Dole, among others. He teaches classes in political campaign strategy and historic Congressional agreements at the George Washington University Graduate School of Political Management.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement