Barack Obama, the Surprisingly Silent President

March 10, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

When you lead the free world, everything matters. Including tone. Although substantive policy traditionally drives and defines the electorate (mandating individual healthcare coverage versus permitting individuals to choose insurance, for example), the manner in which the president approaches his job also serves as a nuanced tool of persuasion.

This political reality makes it all the more curious that the man who ran and won perhaps the most well-orchestrated and enthusiastic presidential election since John F. Kennedy seems, well, just plain distant.

Critics from both parties generally share this observation. Conservatives argue that President Obama's failure to wade into murky political waters (this month the topic du jour is the federal budget) demonstrates a leadership deficit and a default on the "purple America" he promised during his campaign. Liberals, disappointed that Obama hasn't implemented what they thought would be the new New Deal or at least the new Great Society, decry him for failure to act on critical environmental policy or refusing to more rapidly withdrawal U.S. forces from the Middle East. [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on President Obama.]

Whatever your quarrel with the president, he cannot be accused of a heavy-handed approach. The man who famously promised a new era of leadership, who craved every second of each crowded public forum, town hall, and television interview has, at least personally, all but retreated into the shadows. On the two most significant legislative items of his presidency—the federal stimulus and the new healthcare law—President Obama simply told Congress to "work it out," and then accepted their work with little to no modification. Obama assembled a bipartisan all-star deficit commission who worked diligently, disagreed, made compromises, and presented their findings. The president's response to that work? He included virtually none of their recommendations into his most recent fiscal budget. Moreover, President Obama appears to have ceded all foreign policy oversight to Vice President Joe Biden. Those of us who glance at the president and vice president's public daily schedules note that Biden spends significantly (an understatement) more time talking, thinking, and crafting U.S. foreign policy.

For presidents, how much leadership to employ proves a difficult needle to thread. Lead boldly with a balanced hand, and you are Teddy Roosevelt—“The Man in the Arena.” Ignore Congress, plow the only row yourself, and you are George W. Bush—frequently accused of unconstitutionally expanding the reach of the executive branch. [Vote now: What grade o you give Obama?]

It would be easier to decipher Obama’s public reluctance had he not campaigned as the swashbuckling, post-Baby Boomer insistent that only he could save America from itself. Obama, the ubiquitous candidate, graced the cover of pop culture magazines, appeared on daytime talk shows, and shaped virtually all streams of news media. A safe bet would have pegged President Obama stylistically more like Reagan than Coolidge. (“Silent Cal” as President Coolidge was known, was said to so intently dislike conversation that a female dinner guest once enticed him: “I bet my husband I could get you to say three words.” “You lose,” Coolidge responded.)

Whether Obama is disappointed with the day-to-day grind of executing versus campaigning, obsessed with the looming 2012 reelection or (gasp) possibly even experiencing buyer’s remorse, we cannot decipher. Republicans should be wary of growing too excited with Obama’s understatedapproach. While many GOP strategists view his lack of the grandiose as a positive, we should also remember that silent is the cat that swallowed the canary. [Are you on the list? Explore the White House visitor guide.]

Watch to see how Obama couches his leadership skills as an asset during the reelection campaign. For better or for worse, it is safe to say that he is a much different public president than most Americans thought he would be.

 

Tags:
Theodore Roosevelt,
Barack Obama,
George W. Bush,
energy policy and climate change,
Congress,
2012 presidential election,
Ronald Reagan,
deficit and national debt,
national security terrorism and the military,
healthcare reform,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

He's silent because he's got absolutely no clue as to how to be a leader, how to actually perform the job he wanted. I read an article yesterday about his appalling lack of leadership; the author theorized he liked the trappings and the perks, but not the actual work, similarly as he had the job of being editor of the Harvard Law Review, where he did little actual work and contributed no writing.

Many people tried to point this out in the 2008 election, but too many others, including the news media, had stars in their eyes. Thanks a heap.

Beth of IL 8:15AM March 12, 2011

he hasn't a clue how to actually act Presidential.

Leadership? For someone who never lead anything is his life?

People decry the US for unilaterally acting in too many areas, yet, taking the Libya issue as an example, also decry the US when it doesn't act unilaterally.

If Regan were still President, he would have sent air support for the Libyan rebels within days of the start, with the first targets being every Gaddafi palace and military installation. The UN would howl, but who the hell cares - the revolution would be over, and countless lives spared.

Whether we always like it or not, our position as the leading power of the world carries a lot of responsibilities, many of which can be somewhat distasteful.

It takes a strong leader to head up such responsibilities, and Obama has proved beyond any doubt that he is not a leader.

junior of DC 12:14PM March 11, 2011

Of coarse he's silent , he has no sole or morals to stand on or back him up . He depends on other people to think for him .

As far as a vent , a person , Obama , Peace Prize , sits back and lets the freedom fighters in Lybia die because of a no fly zone and he's guttless , yes GUTTLESS .

WHAT IS HAPPENING OVER THERE MAKES ME ASHAMED TO BE AN AMERICAN , we will not stand with the rebels , wait for a worthless UN . No words can discribe how low we must look to the people over there begging for our help , to bad they are looking to an empty suit of a US president .

THIS WILL BE A LOW POINT IN OUR HISTORY , to let the people of Lybia lose .

THANKS OBAMA , you silent guttless wonder .

Hunter of WI 8:23PM March 10, 2011

Cameron Lynch

Cameron Lynch

Cameron Lynch is president the Lynch Group, a government relations, political consulting and government contracting firm. Formerly with the Bipartisan Policy Center, Lynch has worked for Sen. John McCain and former Sen. Bob Dole, among others. He teaches classes in political campaign strategy and historic Congressional agreements at the George Washington University Graduate School of Political Management.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement